Suppr超能文献

通过基于成像的脑深部电刺激(DBS)编程,即使在慢性病程中也能减少编程时间并实现强有力的症状控制。

Reduced Programming Time and Strong Symptom Control Even in Chronic Course Through Imaging-Based DBS Programming.

作者信息

Lange Florian, Steigerwald Frank, Malzacher Tobias, Brandt Gregor Alexander, Odorfer Thorsten Michael, Roothans Jonas, Reich Martin M, Fricke Patrick, Volkmann Jens, Matthies Cordula, Capetian Philipp D

机构信息

Department of Neurology, University Hospital and Julius-Maximilians-University, Wuerzburg, Germany.

Department of Neurosurgery, University Hospital and Julius-Maximilians-University, Wuerzburg, Germany.

出版信息

Front Neurol. 2021 Nov 8;12:785529. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2021.785529. eCollection 2021.

Abstract

Deep brain stimulation (DBS) programming is based on clinical response testing. Our clinical pilot trial assessed the feasibility of image-guided programing using software depicting the lead location in a patient-specific anatomical model. Parkinson's disease patients with subthalamic nucleus-DBS were randomly assigned to standard clinical-based programming (CBP) or anatomical-based (imaging-guided) programming (ABP) in an 8-week crossover trial. Programming characteristics and clinical outcomes were evaluated. In 10 patients, both programs led to similar motor symptom control (MDS-UPDRS III) after 4 weeks (medicationOFF/stimulationON; CPB: 18.27 ± 9.23; ABP: 18.37 ± 6.66). Stimulation settings were not significantly different, apart from higher frequency in the baseline program than CBP ( = 0.01) or ABP ( = 0.003). Time spent in a program was not significantly different (CBP: 86.1 ± 29.82%, ABP: 88.6 ± 29.0%). Programing time was significantly shorter ( = 0.039) with ABP (19.78 ± 5.86 min) than CBP (45.22 ± 18.32). Image-guided DBS programming in PD patients drastically reduces programming time without compromising symptom control and patient satisfaction in this small feasibility trial.

摘要

脑深部电刺激(DBS)程控基于临床反应测试。我们的临床试点试验评估了使用在患者特异性解剖模型中描绘电极位置的软件进行影像引导程控的可行性。在一项为期8周的交叉试验中,将接受丘脑底核-DBS治疗的帕金森病患者随机分配至基于标准临床的程控(CBP)组或基于解剖结构(影像引导)的程控(ABP)组。对程控特征和临床结果进行了评估。在10例患者中,4周后(关药/开刺激),两种程控方式导致的运动症状控制效果(MDS-UPDRS III)相似(CBP组:18.27±9.23;ABP组:18.37±6.66)。刺激参数设置无显著差异,但基线程控中的频率高于CBP组(P = 0.01)或ABP组(P = 0.003)。在一种程控方式上花费的时间无显著差异(CBP组:86.1±29.82%,ABP组:88.6±29.0%)。ABP组的程控时间(19.78±5.86分钟)显著短于CBP组(45.22±18.32分钟)(P = 0.039)。在这项小型可行性试验中,帕金森病患者的影像引导DBS程控显著缩短了程控时间,且不影响症状控制和患者满意度。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/eecc/8606823/d195f7bf3e4a/fneur-12-785529-g0001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验