Lasica Andrej, Filip Pavel, Burdová Kristína, Mana Josef, Růžička Filip, Urgošík Dušan, Mueller Karsten, Kiakou Dimitra, Jech Robert
Department of Neurology, First Faculty of Medicine, General University Hospital in Prague, Charles University, Kateřinská 30, 120 00, Prague, Czech Republic.
Center for Magnetic Resonance Research (CMRR), University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, USA.
Sci Rep. 2025 May 28;15(1):18652. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-01449-6.
Tools for post-operative localization of deep brain stimulation (DBS) electrodes may be of major benefit in the evaluation of the stimulation area. However, little is known about their precision. This study compares 3 different software packages used for DBS electrode localization. T1-weighted MRI images before and after the implantation of the electrodes into the subthalamic nucleus for DBS in 105 Parkinson's disease patients were processed using the pipelines implemented in Lead-DBS, SureTune4, and Brainlab. Euclidean distance between active contacts determined by individual software packages and in repeated processing by the same and by a different operator was calculated. Furthermore, Dice coefficient for overlap of volume of tissue activated (VTA) was determined for Lead-DBS. Medians of Euclidean distances between estimated active contact locations in inter-software package comparison ranged between 1.5 mm and 2 mm. Euclidean distances in within-software package intra- and inter-rater assessments were 0.6-1 mm and 1-1.7 mm, respectively. Median intra- and inter-rater Dice coefficients for VTAs were 0.78 and 0.75, respectively. Since the median distances are close to the size of the target nucleus, any clinical use should be preceded by careful review of the outputs.
用于深部脑刺激(DBS)电极术后定位的工具可能对刺激区域的评估大有裨益。然而,其精度却鲜为人知。本研究比较了3种用于DBS电极定位的不同软件包。使用Lead-DBS、SureTune4和Brainlab中实施的流程,对105例帕金森病患者在将电极植入丘脑底核进行DBS前后的T1加权MRI图像进行处理。计算了各个软件包确定的有效触点之间以及同一操作员和不同操作员重复处理时的欧几里得距离。此外,还确定了Lead-DBS的组织激活体积(VTA)重叠的Dice系数。软件包间比较中估计的有效触点位置之间的欧几里得距离中位数在1.5毫米至2毫米之间。软件包内评分者内和评分者间评估的欧几里得距离分别为0.6 - 1毫米和1 - 1.7毫米。VTA的评分者内和评分者间Dice系数中位数分别为0.78和0.75。由于中位数距离接近目标核的大小,因此在任何临床应用之前都应仔细审查输出结果。