Balzarro Matteo, Rubilotta Emanuele, Mancini Vito, Serati Maurizio, Gubbiotti Marilena, Braga Andrea, Saleh Omar, Torrazzina Marco, Malanowska Ewelina, Serni Sergio, Carrieri Giuseppe, Antonelli Alessandro, Li Marzi Vincenzo
Department of Urology, Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria of Verona, University of Verona, Piazzale Stefani n1, 37126 Verona, Italy.
Department of Urology, Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria of Verona, University of Verona, Verona, Italy.
Ther Adv Urol. 2021 Nov 19;13:17562872211058246. doi: 10.1177/17562872211058246. eCollection 2021 Jan-Dec.
To assess the prevalence of anterior vaginal wall dehiscence in women who underwent anterior vaginal wall colpotomy for pelvic organ prolapse or stress urinary incontinence and to evaluate the influence of suture materials and techniques on wound dehiscence.
This multicenter, prospective study enrolled naïve women for urogynecological surgery affected by anterior vaginal wall defect or stress urinary incontinence. Performed surgical procedures were anterior vaginal wall repair (AVWR) with native tissue (N-AVWR) or polypropylene mesh (M-AVWR), trans-obturator polypropylene in-out middle urethral sling (MUS). Used suture materials were Vicryl 2-0, Vicryl Rapide 2-0, and Monocryl 3-0. Suture techniques were running interlocking or interrupted. Follow-up was performed daily during hospitalization and in outpatient clinic after 10-14, 30 days, and after 3 months.
A total of 1139 patients were enrolled. AVWR were 790: 89.1% N-AVWR, and 10.9% M-AVWR. Polypropylene MUS were 349. Women with prosthetic implantation were 38.2%, while 61.8% had native tissue repair. Overall Vicryl was used in 53.9%, Vicryl Rapide in 37.4%, and Monocryl in 8.7%. Overall running interlocking sutures were 66.5%, while interrupted were 33.5%. Overall wound dehiscence prevalence was 0.9% (10/1139). Wound dehiscence rate of 0.6% (5/790) was documented in AVWR: 0.3% (2/704) in N-AVWR, and 3.5% (3/86) in M-AVWR. Among women underwent MUS, 1.4% (5/349) showed wound dehiscence. In patients who underwent prosthetic surgery, the overall dehiscence prevalence was 1.8% (8/435). A statistically significant higher rate of wound dehiscence was found in women with implanted prosthetic materials.
We reported for the first time the prevalence of wound dehiscence in females who underwent colpotomy for AVWR or MUS. Wound dehiscence occurrence was low, but non-negligible. We found that this complication was poorly associated to the suture methods and materials, while prosthetic material represented a risk factor for wound healing.
评估因盆腔器官脱垂或压力性尿失禁接受阴道前壁切开术的女性中阴道前壁裂开的发生率,并评估缝合材料和技术对伤口裂开的影响。
这项多中心前瞻性研究纳入了因阴道前壁缺损或压力性尿失禁而接受泌尿妇科手术的初治女性。所进行的手术包括使用自体组织的阴道前壁修补术(N-AVWR)或聚丙烯网片的阴道前壁修补术(M-AVWR)、经闭孔聚丙烯出入式中段尿道吊带术(MUS)。使用的缝合材料为2-0薇乔、2-0快薇乔和3-0可吸收单丝缝线。缝合技术为连续锁边或间断缝合。住院期间每日进行随访,出院后在10 - 14天、30天及3个月后进行门诊随访。
共纳入1139例患者。阴道前壁修补术共790例:89.1%为N-AVWR,10.9%为M-AVWR。聚丙烯中段尿道吊带术349例。植入假体的女性占38.2%,而61.8%进行了自体组织修复。总体而言,53.9%使用薇乔,37.4%使用快薇乔,8.7%使用可吸收单丝缝线。总体连续锁边缝合占66.5%,间断缝合占33.5%。总体伤口裂开发生率为0.9%(10/1139)。阴道前壁修补术的伤口裂开率为0.6%(5/790):N-AVWR为0.3%(2/704),M-AVWR为3.5%(3/86)。在接受中段尿道吊带术的女性中,1.4%(5/349)出现伤口裂开。在接受假体手术的患者中,总体裂开发生率为1.8%(8/435)。在植入假体材料的女性中发现伤口裂开率有统计学意义的显著升高。
我们首次报告了因阴道前壁修补术或中段尿道吊带术接受阴道切开术的女性中伤口裂开的发生率。伤口裂开的发生率较低,但不可忽视。我们发现这种并发症与缝合方法和材料的相关性较差,而假体材料是伤口愈合的一个危险因素。