• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

缝线材料在肥厚性瘢痕形成中的作用:可吸收合成缝线(Monocryl)与快速吸收合成缝线(Vicryl-rapide)的对比

The role of suture material in hypertrophic scar formation: Monocryl vs. Vicryl-rapide.

作者信息

Niessen F B, Spauwen P H, Kon M

机构信息

Department of Plastic Surgery, University Hospital, Utrecht, The Netherlands.

出版信息

Ann Plast Surg. 1997 Sep;39(3):254-60. doi: 10.1097/00000637-199709000-00006.

DOI:10.1097/00000637-199709000-00006
PMID:9326705
Abstract

The development of hypertrophic scars and keloids is an unsolved problem in the process of wound healing. There are indications that inflammation plays an important role in this process, but its exact mechanism remains unclear. In this study the amount of inflammation and the development of hypertrophic scars and keloids was investigated in inframammary skin incisions sutured with synthetic absorbable suture materials: a monofilamentous suture (Monocryl) compared with a multifilamentous suture (Vicryl-rapide). In 81 breast reduction patients Monocryl (N = 28) has proved to give significantly smaller, less reactive scars with a lower tendency toward hypertrophic scar formation compared with Vicryl-rapide (N = 53).

摘要

肥厚性瘢痕和瘢痕疙瘩的形成是伤口愈合过程中一个尚未解决的问题。有迹象表明炎症在这一过程中起重要作用,但其确切机制仍不清楚。在本研究中,对使用合成可吸收缝合材料缝合的乳房下皮肤切口处的炎症程度以及肥厚性瘢痕和瘢痕疙瘩的形成情况进行了研究:将单丝缝合线(爱惜康单股缝线)与多丝缝合线(快薇乔)进行比较。在81例乳房缩小术患者中,与快薇乔(n = 53)相比,爱惜康单股缝线(n = 28)已被证明能产生明显更小、反应性更低的瘢痕,形成肥厚性瘢痕的倾向也更低。

相似文献

1
The role of suture material in hypertrophic scar formation: Monocryl vs. Vicryl-rapide.缝线材料在肥厚性瘢痕形成中的作用:可吸收合成缝线(Monocryl)与快速吸收合成缝线(Vicryl-rapide)的对比
Ann Plast Surg. 1997 Sep;39(3):254-60. doi: 10.1097/00000637-199709000-00006.
2
The MOVE-trial: Monocryl® vs. Vicryl Rapide™ for skin repair in mediolateral episiotomies: a randomized controlled trial.MOVE 试验:可吸收缝线(MonoCryl)与薇乔线(Vicryl Rapide)用于会阴侧切缝合的随机对照试验。
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2017 Oct 16;17(1):355. doi: 10.1186/s12884-017-1545-8.
3
Comparison of suture materials for subcuticular skin closure at cesarean delivery.剖宫产皮下皮肤缝合缝线材料的比较
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2016 Oct;215(4):490.e1-5. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2016.05.012. Epub 2016 May 12.
4
Intradermal buried vertical mattress suture as sole skin closure: evaluation of 149 cases.皮内埋藏垂直褥式缝合作为唯一的皮肤闭合方法:149例病例评估
Acta Derm Venereol. 2000 Sep-Oct;80(5):344-7. doi: 10.1080/000155500459277.
5
Effect of human urine on the tensile strength of sutures used for hypospadias surgery.尿液对尿道下裂手术缝线抗张强度的影响。
J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2013 Jun;66(6):835-8. doi: 10.1016/j.bjps.2013.02.006. Epub 2013 Apr 1.
6
Comparison of two suture materials for intradermal skin closure in dogs.用于犬皮内皮肤缝合的两种缝合材料的比较。
Vet Q. 1997 Mar;19(1):20-2. doi: 10.1080/01652176.1997.9694732.
7
Comparison of the Efficacies of Vicryl Rapide and Prolene Sutures in Transcolumellar Incision.经皮环乳晕切口缝线材料的疗效比较:薇乔快薇缝线与可吸收线的对比。
Otolaryngol Pol. 2024 Apr 9;78(2):23-28. doi: 10.5604/01.3001.0053.9314.
8
Laparoscopic suturing: effect of instrument handling on suture strength.腹腔镜缝合:器械操作对缝合强度的影响。
J Endourol. 2005 Nov;19(9):1127-33. doi: 10.1089/end.2005.19.1127.
9
Comparative study of the healing process when using Vicryl®, Vicryl Rapid®, Vicryl Plus®, and Monocryl® sutures in the rat dermal tissue.在大鼠真皮组织中使用薇乔®、快薇乔®、薇乔加强®和爱惜康®缝线时愈合过程的比较研究。
Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2013 Dec;17(4):293-8. doi: 10.1007/s10006-012-0380-3. Epub 2012 Dec 28.
10
A randomized trial between different suture materials (polydioxanone vs. poliglecaprone 25) and different suturing techniques (running subcuticular suture alone vs. with running horizontal mattress) in prevention of hypertrophic scar development in median sternotomy wound.一项关于不同缝合材料(聚二氧六环酮与聚乙醇酸交酯25)和不同缝合技术(单纯连续皮下缝合与连续水平褥式缝合联合)预防正中开胸伤口肥厚性瘢痕形成的随机试验。
J Med Assoc Thai. 2014 Aug;97 Suppl 8:S88-94.

引用本文的文献

1
A retrospective comparison of absorbable versus non-absorbable sutures for elective hand surgery wound closures.择期手部手术伤口缝合中可吸收缝线与不可吸收缝线的回顾性比较。
J Hand Microsurg. 2024 Nov 19;17(1):100178. doi: 10.1016/j.jham.2024.100178. eCollection 2025 Jan.
2
Efficacy of Nd:YAG Laser and Intralesional Triamcinolone Injection Combination Therapy in the Postoperative Management of Keloids.钕钇铝石榴石激光与曲安奈德病灶内注射联合治疗在瘢痕疙瘩术后管理中的疗效
Aesthetic Plast Surg. 2025 Jan;49(2):576-583. doi: 10.1007/s00266-024-04433-z. Epub 2024 Oct 7.
3
Tissue Adhesive versus Skin Suture plus Waterproof Wound Dressings for Carpal Tunnel Wound Closure: A Prospective Randomized Controlled Trial.
组织粘合剂与皮肤缝合加防水伤口敷料用于腕管伤口闭合的前瞻性随机对照试验。
Malays Orthop J. 2024 Jul;18(2):63-70. doi: 10.5704/MOJ.2407.009.
4
Effect of the absorption rate of suture material on oral mucosal scar formation: A triple-blind randomized controlled trial.缝合材料吸收率对口腔黏膜瘢痕形成的影响:一项三盲随机对照试验。
Heliyon. 2023 Dec 6;10(1):e23054. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e23054. eCollection 2024 Jan 15.
5
Prospective Randomized Controlled Trial Comparing Absorbable and Nonabsorbable Sutures in A1 Pulley Release.比较可吸收缝线与不可吸收缝线用于A1滑车松解的前瞻性随机对照试验
Hand (N Y). 2025 Mar;20(2):203-207. doi: 10.1177/15589447231210332. Epub 2023 Nov 24.
6
Prospective randomized controlled trial comparing the effect of Monocryl versus nylon sutures on patient- and observer-assessed outcomes following carpal tunnel surgery.前瞻性随机对照试验比较了可吸收线与尼龙缝线在腕管手术后患者和观察者评估结果方面的效果。
J Hand Surg Eur Vol. 2023 Nov;48(10):1014-1021. doi: 10.1177/17531934231178383. Epub 2023 Jun 9.
7
Comparative study of surgical wound closure with nylon interrupted sutures and running subcuticular vicryl rapide suture after open release of the carpal tunnel.腕管切开术后尼龙间断缝合与皮下连续快薇乔缝合手术伤口闭合的比较研究
Scars Burn Heal. 2022 Sep 29;8:20595131221128951. doi: 10.1177/20595131221128951. eCollection 2022 Jan-Dec.
8
Comparison of scar outcomes of alar flare region using absorbable and non-absorbable sutures: a single-blind study.采用可吸收和不可吸收缝线对鼻翼扇动区瘢痕结局的比较:一项单盲研究。
Braz J Otorhinolaryngol. 2022 Nov-Dec;88 Suppl 5(Suppl 5):S133-S139. doi: 10.1016/j.bjorl.2022.06.001. Epub 2022 Jun 15.
9
Including a Vessel Loop in Wound Closure Facilitates Suture Removal Following Open Carpal Tunnel Release.在腕管松解术后的伤口闭合中包含一个血管环有助于拆线。
Hand (N Y). 2023 Jan;18(1_suppl):84S-90S. doi: 10.1177/15589447221092062. Epub 2022 Jun 5.
10
Cosmetic Outcome of Robotic Surgery Compared to Laparoscopic Surgery for Benign Gynecologic Disease.机器人手术与腹腔镜手术治疗良性妇科疾病的美容效果比较
JSLS. 2022 Apr-Jun;26(2). doi: 10.4293/JSLS.2021.00081.