Suppr超能文献

间变性淋巴瘤激酶阳性非小细胞肺癌一线治疗策略的疗效与安全性:一项贝叶斯网络荟萃分析

Efficacy and Safety of First-Line Treatment Strategies for Anaplastic Lymphoma Kinase-Positive Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer: A Bayesian Network Meta-Analysis.

作者信息

Peng Ling, Lu Dafeng, Xia Yang, Hong Shaodong, Selvaggi Giovanni, Stebbing Justin, Sun Yilan, Liang Fei

机构信息

Department of Respiratory Disease, Zhejiang Provincial People's Hospital, Affiliated People's Hospital, Hangzhou Medical College, Hangzhou, China.

School of Public Health, Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, China.

出版信息

Front Oncol. 2021 Nov 8;11:754768. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2021.754768. eCollection 2021.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Targeted therapies have led to significant improvement in the management and prognosis of anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK)-positive non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). We performed a network meta-analysis of frontline treatment options of ALK-positive NSCLC to provide clinical guidance.

METHODS

PubMed, Embase, ClinicalTrials.gov, and international conference databases were searched to identify relevant trials from inception to June 30, 2021. Phase III randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing treatments for patients with ALK-positive advanced NSCLC in the first-line setting were included in a Bayesian network meta-analysis. Eligible studies reported at least one of the following clinical outcomes: progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), risk of the central nervous system (CNS) progression, adverse events (AEs) of grade (G) 3 or higher (G3 AEs), or serious AEs (SAEs). Hazard ratios (HRs) and CI for primary outcome of PFS and secondary outcome of OS and risk of CNS progression were obtained. A multivariate, consistency model, fixed-effects analysis was used in the network meta-analysis. Data on G3 AEs and SAEs were abstracted and meta-analyzed. Risk of bias (RoB) was assessed using the Cochrane Collaboration's tool.

RESULTS

Nine RCTs comprising 2,484 patients were included with seven treatments: alectinib, brigatinib, ceritinib, crizotinib, ensartinib, lorlatinib, and chemotherapy. Compared with chemotherapy, ALK-tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) significantly prolong PFS and reduced risk of CNS progression except for ceritinib. Lorlatinib appears superior at reducing risk of CNS progression. None of the ALK-TKIs have a significantly prolonged OS as compared with chemotherapy. Lorlatinib increases the risk of G3 AEs as compared with alectinib (odds ratio 4.26 [95% CrI 1.22 to 15.53]), while alectinib caused the fewest G3 AEs.

CONCLUSIONS

Lorlatinib is associated with the highest PFS benefit and lowest risk of CNS progression benefits for patients with advanced ALK-positive NSCLC, compared with other first-line treatments, but with higher toxicity. The implementation of a newer generation of ALK-TKIs in the first-line treatment of ALK-positive NSCLC into current clinical practice is evolving rapidly.

摘要

背景

靶向治疗已使间变性淋巴瘤激酶(ALK)阳性非小细胞肺癌(NSCLC)的治疗管理和预后有了显著改善。我们对ALK阳性NSCLC的一线治疗方案进行了网状Meta分析,以提供临床指导。

方法

检索了PubMed、Embase、ClinicalTrials.gov和国际会议数据库,以识别从数据库建立至2021年6月30日的相关试验。将比较一线治疗ALK阳性晚期NSCLC患者不同治疗方法的III期随机对照试验(RCT)纳入贝叶斯网状Meta分析。符合条件的研究报告了以下至少一项临床结局:无进展生存期(PFS)、总生存期(OS)、中枢神经系统(CNS)进展风险、3级或更高等级(G3)不良事件(AE)或严重不良事件(SAE)。获得了PFS主要结局、OS次要结局和CNS进展风险的风险比(HR)及可信区间(CI)。在网状Meta分析中使用了多变量、一致性模型、固定效应分析。提取并对G3 AE和SAE的数据进行Meta分析。使用Cochrane协作组的工具评估偏倚风险(RoB)。

结果

纳入了9项RCT,共2484例患者,涉及7种治疗方法:阿来替尼、布加替尼、色瑞替尼、克唑替尼、恩沙替尼、洛拉替尼和化疗。与化疗相比,除色瑞替尼外,ALK酪氨酸激酶抑制剂(TKI)显著延长PFS并降低CNS进展风险。洛拉替尼在降低CNS进展风险方面似乎更具优势。与化疗相比,没有一种ALK-TKI能显著延长OS。与阿来替尼相比,洛拉替尼增加了G3 AE的风险(比值比4.26 [95% CrI 1.22至15.53]),而阿来替尼引起的G3 AE最少。

结论

与其他一线治疗方法相比,洛拉替尼对晚期ALK阳性NSCLC患者的PFS获益最高,CNS进展风险获益最低,但毒性更高。将新一代ALK-TKI用于ALK阳性NSCLC的一线治疗并纳入当前临床实践的进程正在迅速发展。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1e38/8606689/4d8b37a92d3d/fonc-11-754768-g001.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验