Kennedy Maura, Koehl Jennifer, Gao Jingya, Ciampa Katherine A, Hayes Bryan D, Camargo Carlos A
Department of Emergency Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
Department of Emergency Medicine, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
J Am Geriatr Soc. 2022 Mar;70(3):731-742. doi: 10.1111/jgs.17590. Epub 2021 Nov 25.
Antipsychotics and sedatives are used to treat agitation in the emergency department (ED) but carry significant risk in older adults. Our objective was to determine factors associated with their administration to older ED patients.
This was an observational study using data from the 2014-2017 National Hospital Ambulatory Medical Care Survey. We identified ED visits for patients aged ≥65 years and determined whether an antipsychotic or sedative was administered. Visits related to substance use/withdrawal, other psychiatric complaints, and intubation were excluded. We performed multivariable logistic regression to identify risk factors for antipsychotic or sedative administration.
Of the 78.7 million ED visits that met inclusion criteria, 3.5% involved at least one dose of antipsychotic or sedative medication; 13% involved an antipsychotic and 92% a sedative. Factors associated with antipsychotic administration included nursing home residence (adjusted odds ratio [aOR]: 2.67; 95% CI: 1.05-6.80), dementia (aOR: 5.62; 95% CI: 2.44-12.94), and delirium (aOR: 7.33; 95% CI: 2.21-24.32). Sedative administration was positively associated with CT or MR imaging (aOR: 1.86; 95% CI: 1.42-2.43), urbanicity of ED (aOR: 1.46; 95% CI: 1.02-2.08), and female gender (aOR: 1.47; 95% CI: 1.08-1.99) and negatively associated with older age (age: 75-84; aOR: 0.67; 95% CI: 0.49-0.91; age: 85+; aOR: 0.63; 95% CI: 0.45-0.88; reference age: 65-74 years). Antipsychotic and sedative administration were associated with prolonged ED lengths of stay and hospital admission.
We identified patient- and facility-level factors associated with sedative and antipsychotic administration in older ED patients. Antipsychotic and sedative administration were associated with prolonged ED lengths of stay and hospital admission.
抗精神病药物和镇静剂用于急诊科治疗躁动,但在老年人中使用存在重大风险。我们的目的是确定与老年急诊科患者使用这些药物相关的因素。
这是一项观察性研究,使用了2014 - 2017年国家医院门诊医疗调查的数据。我们确定了年龄≥65岁患者的急诊科就诊情况,并判断是否使用了抗精神病药物或镇静剂。排除与药物使用/戒断、其他精神疾病主诉和插管相关的就诊。我们进行多变量逻辑回归以确定使用抗精神病药物或镇静剂的危险因素。
在符合纳入标准的7870万次急诊科就诊中,3.5%涉及至少一剂抗精神病药物或镇静剂;13%涉及抗精神病药物,92%涉及镇静剂。与使用抗精神病药物相关的因素包括居住在养老院(调整比值比[aOR]:2.67;95%置信区间[CI]:1.05 - 6.80)、痴呆(aOR:5.62;95% CI:2.44 - 12.94)和谵妄(aOR:7.33;95% CI:2.21 - 24.32)。使用镇静剂与CT或磁共振成像(aOR:1.86;95% CI:1.42 - 2.43)、急诊科所在城市(aOR:1.46;95% CI:1.02 - 2.08)以及女性性别(aOR:1.47;95% CI:1.08 - 1.99)呈正相关,与高龄呈负相关(年龄:75 - 84岁;aOR:0.67;95% CI:0.49 - 0.91;年龄:85岁及以上;aOR:0.63;95% CI:0.45 - 0.88;参考年龄:65 - 74岁)。使用抗精神病药物和镇静剂与急诊科住院时间延长和住院相关。
我们确定了与老年急诊科患者使用镇静剂和抗精神病药物相关的患者和机构层面因素。使用抗精神病药物和镇静剂与急诊科住院时间延长和住院相关。