• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

基于国家设定的能力标准,为执业药师药物审查能力制定并试行自我评估工具。

Developing and piloting a self-assessment tool for medication review competence of practicing pharmacists based on nationally set competence criteria.

机构信息

Clinical Pharmacy Group, Division of Pharmacology and Pharmacotherapy, Faculty of Pharmacy, University of Helsinki, Viikinkaari 5 E, P.O. box 56, 00014, Helsinki, Finland.

出版信息

BMC Health Serv Res. 2021 Nov 25;21(1):1274. doi: 10.1186/s12913-021-07291-6.

DOI:10.1186/s12913-021-07291-6
PMID:34823529
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8620234/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

New competence requirements have emerged for pharmacists as a result of changing societal needs towards more patient-centred practices. Today, medication review competence can be considered as basic pharmaceutical competence. Medication review specific competence criteria and tools for self-assessing the competence are essential in building competences and a shared understanding of medication reviews as a collaborative practice. The aim of this study was to develop and pilot a self-assessment tool for medication review competence among practicing pharmacists in Finland.

METHODS

The development of the self-assessment tool was based on the national medication review competence criteria for pharmacists established in Finland in 2017 and piloting the tool among practicing pharmacists in a national online survey in October 2018. The pharmacists self-assessed their medication review competence with a five-point Likert scale ranging from 1 for "very poor/not at all" to 5 for "very good".

RESULTS

The internal consistency of the self-assessment tool was high as the range of the competence areas' Cronbach's alpha was 0.953-0.973. The competence areas consisted of prescription review competence (20 items, Cronbach's alpha 0.953), additional statements for medication review competence (11 additional items, Cronbach's alpha 0.963) and medication review as a whole, including both the statements of prescription review and medication review competence (31 items, Cronbach's alpha 0.973). Competence items closely related to routine dispensing were most commonly self-estimated to be mastered by the practicing pharmacists who responded (n = 344), while the more clinical and patient-centred competence items had the lowest self-estimates. This indicates that the self-assessment tool works logically and differentiates pharmacists according to competence. The self-assessed medication review competence was at a very good or good level among more than half (55%) of the respondents (n = 344).

CONCLUSION

A self-assessment tool for medication review competence was developed and validated. The piloted self-assessment tool can be used for regular evaluation of practicing pharmacists' medication review competence which is becoming an increasingly important basis for their contribution to patient care and society.

摘要

背景

由于社会对以患者为中心的实践的需求不断变化,药师需要具备新的能力要求。如今,药物审查能力可以被视为基本药学能力。药物审查特定能力标准和自我评估能力的工具对于建立能力和对药物审查作为一种协作实践的共同理解至关重要。本研究的目的是为芬兰的执业药师开发和试点一种药物审查能力的自我评估工具。

方法

自我评估工具的开发基于 2017 年在芬兰建立的药师药物审查能力国家标准,并于 2018 年 10 月在全国在线调查中对执业药师进行试点。药师使用五点李克特量表对他们的药物审查能力进行自我评估,范围从 1(非常差/完全没有)到 5(非常好)。

结果

自我评估工具的内部一致性很高,因为能力领域的克朗巴赫α范围为 0.953-0.973。能力领域包括处方审查能力(20 项,克朗巴赫α 0.953)、药物审查能力的附加说明(11 项附加项,克朗巴赫α 0.963)以及药物审查作为一个整体,包括处方审查和药物审查能力的说明(31 项,克朗巴赫α 0.973)。与常规配药密切相关的能力项目最常被回复的执业药师自我评估为掌握(n=344),而更具临床和以患者为中心的能力项目自我评估最低。这表明自我评估工具逻辑上有效,并根据能力区分药师。超过一半(55%)的受访者(n=344)的自我评估药物审查能力处于非常好或良好水平。

结论

开发并验证了一种药物审查能力的自我评估工具。试点的自我评估工具可用于定期评估执业药师的药物审查能力,这对于他们为患者护理和社会做出贡献变得越来越重要。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1b17/8620234/cbc570ed4ac4/12913_2021_7291_Fig5_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1b17/8620234/c829f18edc88/12913_2021_7291_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1b17/8620234/3c8092c24120/12913_2021_7291_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1b17/8620234/04afe0b290ee/12913_2021_7291_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1b17/8620234/4de2d63653d5/12913_2021_7291_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1b17/8620234/cbc570ed4ac4/12913_2021_7291_Fig5_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1b17/8620234/c829f18edc88/12913_2021_7291_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1b17/8620234/3c8092c24120/12913_2021_7291_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1b17/8620234/04afe0b290ee/12913_2021_7291_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1b17/8620234/4de2d63653d5/12913_2021_7291_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1b17/8620234/cbc570ed4ac4/12913_2021_7291_Fig5_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Developing and piloting a self-assessment tool for medication review competence of practicing pharmacists based on nationally set competence criteria.基于国家设定的能力标准,为执业药师药物审查能力制定并试行自我评估工具。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2021 Nov 25;21(1):1274. doi: 10.1186/s12913-021-07291-6.
2
Identifying Gaps in Community Pharmacists' Competence in Medication Risk Management in Routine Dispensing.识别社区药剂师在常规配药中药物风险管理能力的差距。
Innov Pharm. 2021 Feb 11;12(1). doi: 10.24926/iip.v12i1.3510. eCollection 2021.
3
Validation of a survey tool assessing effectiveness of an educational intervention on the caring behaviors and referral activities of community pharmacists for migraineurs.一种用于评估教育干预对社区药剂师针对偏头痛患者的关怀行为及转诊活动有效性的调查工具的验证。
Res Social Adm Pharm. 2015 May-Jun;11(3):352-63. doi: 10.1016/j.sapharm.2014.08.012. Epub 2014 Oct 7.
4
Adapting the US Institute for Safe Medication Practices' Medication Safety Self Assessment tool for community pharmacies in Finland.将美国安全用药实践研究所的用药安全自我评估工具应用于芬兰的社区药房。
Int J Pharm Pract. 2012 Feb;20(1):15-24. doi: 10.1111/j.2042-7174.2011.00158.x. Epub 2011 Sep 19.
5
Can Source Triangulation Be Used to Overcome Limitations of Self-Assessments? Assessing Educational Needs and Professional Competence of Pharmacists Practicing in Qatar.来源三角验证法能否用于克服自我评估的局限性?评估在卡塔尔执业的药剂师的教育需求和专业能力。
J Contin Educ Health Prof. 2017 Spring;37(2):83-89. doi: 10.1097/CEH.0000000000000148.
6
Assessing the pharmaceutical care needs of asthmatic patients.评估哮喘患者的药学服务需求。
Pharm World Sci. 2004 Dec;26(6):313-8. doi: 10.1007/s11096-004-9007-6.
7
A system approach to dispensing errors: a national study on perceptions of the Finnish community pharmacists.一种解决调配差错的系统方法:一项关于芬兰社区药剂师认知的全国性研究。
Pharm World Sci. 2008 Dec;30(6):823-33. doi: 10.1007/s11096-008-9233-4. Epub 2008 Jun 24.
8
Development of a scale to measure pharmacists' self-efficacy in performing medication therapy management services.开发一种衡量药师在执行药物治疗管理服务方面的自我效能的量表。
Res Social Adm Pharm. 2010 Jun;6(2):155-61. doi: 10.1016/j.sapharm.2010.05.001.
9
Are pharmacists ready for a greater role in travel health? An evaluation of the knowledge and confidence in providing travel health advice of pharmacists practicing in a community pharmacy chain in Alberta, Canada.药剂师是否准备好在旅行健康方面发挥更大的作用?对加拿大艾伯塔省一家连锁社区药房中执业的药剂师提供旅行健康建议的知识和信心进行评估。
J Travel Med. 2015 Mar-Apr;22(2):99-104. doi: 10.1111/jtm.12172. Epub 2014 Nov 20.
10
Development and initial validation of a scale to measure attitudes and beliefs of pharmacists toward their work with patients.一种用于衡量药剂师对其与患者工作的态度和信念的量表的开发与初步验证。
Vojnosanit Pregl. 2014 Apr;71(4):373-82. doi: 10.2298/vsp120314051j.

引用本文的文献

1
Identifying Medication Review Topics to Be Documented in a Structured Form in Electronic Health Record Systems: Delphi Consensus Survey.确定要在电子健康记录系统中以结构化形式记录的药物审查主题:德尔菲共识调查。
J Med Internet Res. 2025 May 6;27:e70133. doi: 10.2196/70133.
2
Developing an In-House Comprehensive Medication Review Training Program for Clinical Pharmacists in a Finnish Hospital Pharmacy.为芬兰医院药剂科的临床药师制定内部综合药物审查培训计划。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2023 Jun 16;20(12):6158. doi: 10.3390/ijerph20126158.
3
Perceptions of Community Pharmacists Towards Patient Counseling and Continuing Pharmacy Education Programs in Sudan.

本文引用的文献

1
Developing Medication Review Competency in Undergraduate Pharmacy Training: A Self-Assessment by Third-Year Students.发展本科生药学培训中的药物审查能力:三年级学生的自我评估。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2023 Mar 14;20(6):5079. doi: 10.3390/ijerph20065079.
2
Identifying Gaps in Community Pharmacists' Competence in Medication Risk Management in Routine Dispensing.识别社区药剂师在常规配药中药物风险管理能力的差距。
Innov Pharm. 2021 Feb 11;12(1). doi: 10.24926/iip.v12i1.3510. eCollection 2021.
3
Collaborative Medication Reviews to Identify Inappropriate Prescribing in Pre-Admission Medications at Emergency Department Short-Term Ward.
苏丹社区药剂师对患者咨询及继续药学教育项目的看法
Integr Pharm Res Pract. 2023 Apr 4;12:77-85. doi: 10.2147/IPRP.S406219. eCollection 2023.
4
Developing Medication Review Competency in Undergraduate Pharmacy Training: A Self-Assessment by Third-Year Students.发展本科生药学培训中的药物审查能力:三年级学生的自我评估。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2023 Mar 14;20(6):5079. doi: 10.3390/ijerph20065079.
协作性药物审查以识别急诊科短期病房入院前用药中的不适当处方。
Integr Pharm Res Pract. 2021 Apr 22;10:23-32. doi: 10.2147/IPRP.S280523. eCollection 2021.
4
Policy and vision for community pharmacies in Finland: A roadmap towards enhanced integration and reduced costs.芬兰社区药房的政策与愿景:迈向强化整合与降低成本的路线图。
Pharm Pract (Granada). 2021 Jan-Mar;19(1):2288. doi: 10.18549/PharmPract.2021.1.2288. Epub 2021 Feb 4.
5
Medication Risk Management in Routine Dispensing in Community Pharmacies.社区药店常规配药中的药物风险管理。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Nov 5;17(21):8186. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17218186.
6
Interprofessional Medication Assessment has Effects on the Quality of Medication Among Home Care Patients: Randomized Controlled Intervention Study.跨专业药物评估对居家护理患者的用药质量有影响:随机对照干预研究。
J Am Med Dir Assoc. 2021 Jan;22(1):74-81. doi: 10.1016/j.jamda.2020.07.007. Epub 2020 Sep 3.
7
How far are we from a medication use process aiming at well-informed adherent patients with long-term medications in Finland? Qualitative study.在芬兰,我们距离实现让长期用药的患者知情并遵从医嘱的药物使用流程还有多远?定性研究。
BMJ Open. 2020 Jun 21;10(6):e036526. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-036526.
8
Improving community pharmacists' clinical knowledge to detect and resolve drug-related problems in Croatia: a before/after survey study investigating the efficacy of an educational intervention.提高克罗地亚社区药剂师检测和解决药物相关问题的临床知识:一项调查教育干预效果的前后对照研究。
BMJ Open. 2020 Jun 1;10(6):e034674. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-034674.
9
An inventory of collaborative medication reviews for older adults - evolution of practices.老年人合作药物审查清单 - 实践的演变。
BMC Geriatr. 2019 Nov 21;19(1):321. doi: 10.1186/s12877-019-1317-6.
10
Community pharmacist-led medication review procedures across Europe: Characterization, implementation and remuneration.欧洲社区药剂师主导的药物审查程序:特征、实施和报酬。
Res Social Adm Pharm. 2020 Aug;16(8):1057-1066. doi: 10.1016/j.sapharm.2019.11.002. Epub 2019 Nov 7.