Auvinen Kati J, Räisänen Johanna, Voutilainen Ari, Jyrkkä Johanna, Mäntyselkä Pekka, Lönnroos Eija
The East Savo Hospital District, Savonlinna, Finland; Institute of Public Health and Clinical Nutrition, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Eastern Finland, Kuopio, Finland.
Institute of Public Health and Clinical Nutrition, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Eastern Finland, Kuopio, Finland.
J Am Med Dir Assoc. 2021 Jan;22(1):74-81. doi: 10.1016/j.jamda.2020.07.007. Epub 2020 Sep 3.
Multimorbidity and complex medications increase the risk of medication-related problems, especially in vulnerable home care patients. The objective of this study was to examine whether interprofessional medication assessment has an effect on medication quality among home care patients.
The FIMA (Finnish Interprofessional Medication Assessment) study was a randomized, controlled study comparing physician-led interprofessional medication assessment and usual care.
The FIMA study was conducted in home care settings in Finland. The participants were ≥65-year-old home care patients with ≥6 drugs daily, dizziness, orthostatic hypotension, or a recent fall.
Primary outcome measures over the 6-month follow-up were number of drugs, drug-drug-interactions, medication-related risk loads, and use of potentially inappropriate medications (PIMs) examined by SFINX, RENBASE, PHARAO, and Meds75+ databases. The databases classified information as follows: A (no known pharmacologic or clinical basis for an increased risk), B (evidence not available/uncertain), C (moderately increased risk which may have clinical relevance), and D (high risk, best to avoid). Logistic regression adjusted for age, sex, and the baseline level of the outcome measure served as statistical methods.
The mean number of all drugs for home care patients (n = 512) was 15. The odds of drug-induced impairment of renal function (RENBASE D, P = .020) and medication-related risk loads for bleeding (PHARAO D, P = .001), anticholinergic effects (PHARAO D, P = .009), and constipation (PHARAO D, P = .003) decreased significantly in the intervention group compared with usual care. The intervention also reduced the odds of using PIMs (Meds75+ D, P = .005). There were no significant changes in drug-drug-interactions or number of drugs.
FIMA intervention improved the medication quality of home care patients. Risks for renal failure, anticholinergic effects, bleeding, constipation, and the use of PIMs were reduced significantly.
多病共存和复杂用药增加了药物相关问题的风险,尤其是在脆弱的居家护理患者中。本研究的目的是检验跨专业药物评估对居家护理患者的用药质量是否有影响。
FIMA(芬兰跨专业药物评估)研究是一项随机对照研究,比较了由医生主导的跨专业药物评估和常规护理。
FIMA研究在芬兰的居家护理环境中进行。参与者为年龄≥65岁、每日服用≥6种药物、有头晕、体位性低血压或近期跌倒情况的居家护理患者。
在6个月的随访期间,主要结局指标包括药物数量、药物相互作用、药物相关风险负荷,以及通过SFINX、RENBASE、PHARAO和Meds75+数据库检查的潜在不适当药物(PIM)的使用情况。这些数据库将信息分类如下:A(无已知的增加风险的药理学或临床依据)、B(证据不可用/不确定)、C(中度增加风险,可能具有临床相关性)和D(高风险,最好避免)。以年龄、性别和结局指标的基线水平进行调整的逻辑回归作为统计方法。
居家护理患者(n = 512)的所有药物平均数量为15种。与常规护理相比,干预组中药物引起的肾功能损害(RENBASE D,P = 0.020)以及出血(PHARAO D,P = 0.001)、抗胆碱能效应(PHARAO D,P = 0.009)和便秘(PHARAO D,P = 0.003)的药物相关风险负荷显著降低。干预还降低了使用PIM的几率(Meds75+ D,P = 0.005)。药物相互作用或药物数量没有显著变化。
FIMA干预改善了居家护理患者的用药质量。肾衰竭、抗胆碱能效应、出血、便秘以及PIM使用的风险显著降低。