Netaji Jeshwanth, Banerjee Sumit, Garg Pawan Kumar, Elhence Abhay
Department of Orthopaedics, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Jodhpur, 342005 Rajasthan India.
Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Jodhpur, India.
Indian J Orthop. 2021 Oct 15;55(5):1186-1194. doi: 10.1007/s43465-021-00506-2. eCollection 2021 Oct.
The majority of arthroplasty surgeons use a full duration of tourniquet while doing total knee arthroplasty. Recent literature suggests clinical dilemma about superior function with limited duration use of a tourniquet. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the time-dependent effects and clinical outcome of tourniquet in patients undergoing total knee arthroplasty (TKA) and to assess the incidence of adverse vascular events of the limb in TKA. This study is the first of its kind to evaluate all the serious vascular events prospectively.
Sixty participants who underwent TKA in the duration of 1.5 years at a large single tertiary care centre were recruited and randomly allocated in two groups: Full duration tourniquet ( = 30) and tourniquet only during cementation ( = 30). All patients underwent preoperative and postoperative arterial and venous Doppler to evaluate the presence of thrombosis. The operative duration, blood loss, and clinical outcome (visual analogue scale, active knee range of motion, Knee Society score, and duration of stay) were recorded.
The incidence of vascular complications was not statistically significant in either group ( = 0.99). Tourniquet during cementation only group exhibited decreased postoperative pain on days 1, 2, and 3 ( < 0.01). But postoperative knee active range of motion was the same between the two groups with no significant postoperative complications.
Tourniquet use only during cementation could result in faster recovery and less pain during the early rehabilitation period with no influence over the incidence of serious vascular events.
AIIMS/IEC/2018/475. This study was approved by the Research Ethics Committee at All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Jodhpur and was carried out at AIIMS (Jodhpur), India.
大多数关节置换外科医生在进行全膝关节置换术时会全程使用止血带。近期文献表明,关于有限时长使用止血带是否具有更好的功能存在临床争议。本研究的目的是评估止血带在全膝关节置换术(TKA)患者中的时间依赖性影响和临床结局,并评估TKA患者肢体不良血管事件的发生率。本研究是同类研究中首个前瞻性评估所有严重血管事件的研究。
招募了在一家大型三级医疗中心1.5年内接受TKA的60名参与者,并将其随机分为两组:全程使用止血带组(n = 30)和仅在骨水泥固定时使用止血带组(n = 30)。所有患者术前和术后均接受动静脉多普勒检查以评估血栓形成情况。记录手术时长、失血量和临床结局(视觉模拟评分、膝关节主动活动范围、膝关节协会评分和住院时长)。
两组血管并发症的发生率均无统计学意义(P = 0.99)。仅在骨水泥固定时使用止血带组在术后第1、2和3天的疼痛减轻(P < 0.01)。但两组术后膝关节主动活动范围相同,且无明显术后并发症。
仅在骨水泥固定时使用止血带可使患者在早期康复阶段恢复更快、疼痛更少,且不影响严重血管事件的发生率。
AIIMS/IEC/2018/475。本研究经印度焦特布尔全印医学科学研究所研究伦理委员会批准,在印度焦特布尔全印医学科学研究所进行。