• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

双侧序贯全髋关节置换术与分期置换术一样安全吗?对一家三级护理中心108例病例的配对分析。

Is Bilateral Sequential Total Hip Replacement as Safe an Option as Staged Replacement? A Matched Pair Analysis of 108 Cases at a Tertiary Care Centre.

作者信息

Panchal Sameer, Jogani Abhinav D, Mohanty Shubhranshu S, Rathod Tushar, Kamble Prashant, Keny Swapnil A

机构信息

Department of Orthopaedics, Grant Medical College and Sir JJ Group of Hospitals, Mumbai, 400008 India.

Department of Orthopaedics, Seth GS Medical College and KEM Hospital, Mumbai, 400012 India.

出版信息

Indian J Orthop. 2021 Oct 4;55(5):1250-1255. doi: 10.1007/s43465-021-00536-w. eCollection 2021 Oct.

DOI:10.1007/s43465-021-00536-w
PMID:34824726
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8586291/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Rationale for symptomatic severe bilateral arthritis of the hip is sequential bilateral THR completed under the same anaesthesia. The rarity of procedures and apprehension of complications preclude the widespread use.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Retrospective analysis of prospectively collected data from 108 patients (216 hips) with bilateral arthritis who underwent total hip arthroplasties was done: out of which 54 patients (108 hips) underwent a single-stage sequential procedure (sequential group) and a matched group of 54 patients (108 hips) underwent a two-stage procedure at different admissions (staged group). Patients were matched according to age (± 2 years), gender, American Society of Anaesthesiologists classification, perioperative management protocol and diagnosis. The mean duration of follow-up for sequential group was 5.1 years while that of staged group was 5.3 years.

RESULTS

Most patients (88.88%) were operated with uncemented implants having ceramic on ceramic bearing surfaces under spinal or general anaesthesia. The operating time, post-op limb length and functional outcomes of both groups were comparable. Although the total estimated blood loss was significantly less in the sequential group (502 ml) as compared to the staged group (570 ml), the mean blood transfusion requirement was significantly higher (1.6 units) in the sequential group as compared to that in the staged group (0.9 units). The mean cumulative length of hospital stay was significantly longer in the staged group (23 days) compared with the sequential group (16 days).

CONCLUSION

Single-stage bilateral total hip arthroplasty is a safe and viable option when performed with expertise in appropriately selected patients without any surge in complications.

摘要

背景

对于有症状的双侧严重髋关节关节炎,采用在同一麻醉下完成双侧全髋关节置换术(THR)的方案。该手术的罕见性以及对并发症的担忧限制了其广泛应用。

材料与方法

对前瞻性收集的108例双侧关节炎患者(216髋)行全髋关节置换术的数据进行回顾性分析:其中54例患者(108髋)接受了单阶段序贯手术(序贯组),另一组匹配的54例患者(108髋)在不同住院期间接受了两阶段手术(分期组)。根据年龄(±2岁)、性别、美国麻醉医师协会分级、围手术期管理方案和诊断对患者进行匹配。序贯组的平均随访时间为5.1年,分期组为5.3年。

结果

大多数患者(88.88%)在脊髓麻醉或全身麻醉下使用非骨水泥型假体,其关节面为陶瓷对陶瓷。两组的手术时间、术后肢体长度和功能结果具有可比性。虽然序贯组的估计总失血量(502 ml)明显少于分期组(570 ml),但序贯组的平均输血需求量(1.6单位)明显高于分期组(0.9单位)。分期组的平均累计住院时间(23天)明显长于序贯组(16天)。

结论

对于经过适当选择的患者,由专业人员进行单阶段双侧全髋关节置换术是一种安全可行的选择,且不会出现并发症激增的情况。

相似文献

1
Is Bilateral Sequential Total Hip Replacement as Safe an Option as Staged Replacement? A Matched Pair Analysis of 108 Cases at a Tertiary Care Centre.双侧序贯全髋关节置换术与分期置换术一样安全吗?对一家三级护理中心108例病例的配对分析。
Indian J Orthop. 2021 Oct 4;55(5):1250-1255. doi: 10.1007/s43465-021-00536-w. eCollection 2021 Oct.
2
Retrospective Cohort Study Comparing Complications, Readmission, Transfusion, and Length of Stay of Patients Undergoing Simultaneous and Staged Bilateral Total Hip Arthroplasty.回顾性队列研究比较同期双侧全髋关节置换术与分期双侧全髋关节置换术患者的并发症、再入院、输血和住院时间。
Orthop Surg. 2020 Feb;12(1):233-240. doi: 10.1111/os.12617. Epub 2020 Jan 20.
3
Functional and Radiological Outcomes Following Simultaneous Bilateral Total Hip Arthroplasty: Analysis of a Retrospective Series.同期双侧全髋关节置换术后的功能和影像学结果:一项回顾性系列分析
Cureus. 2023 Oct 2;15(10):e46361. doi: 10.7759/cureus.46361. eCollection 2023 Oct.
4
Are the First or the Second Hips of Staged Bilateral THAs More Similar to Unilateral Procedures? A Study from the Swedish Hip Arthroplasty Register.分期双侧全髋关节置换术的初次置换还是翻修置换髋关节与单侧手术更相似?来自瑞典髋关节置换登记处的研究。
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2020 Jun;478(6):1262-1270. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000001210.
5
Single-Anesthetic Versus Staged Bilateral Total Hip Arthroplasty: A Matched Cohort Study.单麻醉与分期双侧全髋关节置换术:一项匹配队列研究。
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2017 Jan 4;99(1):48-54. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.15.01223.
6
Is one-stage bilateral sequential total hip replacement as safe as unilateral total hip replacement?一期双侧序贯全髋关节置换术与单侧全髋关节置换术一样安全吗?
J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2009 Mar;91(3):316-20. doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.91B3.21817.
7
Bilateral total hip arthroplasty: one-stage versus two-stage procedures.双侧全髋关节置换术:一期手术与二期手术对比
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2006 Dec;453:137-41. doi: 10.1097/01.blo.0000246529.14135.2b.
8
The Safety of Bilateral Simultaneous Hip and Knee Arthroplasty versus Staged Arthroplasty in a High-Volume Center Comparing Blood Loss, Peri- and Postoperative Complications, and Early Functional Outcome.在高容量中心比较双侧同期髋膝关节置换术与分期置换术的安全性:失血情况、围手术期及术后并发症和早期功能结局
J Clin Med. 2021 Sep 29;10(19):4507. doi: 10.3390/jcm10194507.
9
Is single-anaesthetic bilateral primary total hip replacement still safe? A 16-year cohort study from the New Zealand Joint Registry.单次麻醉下双侧一期全髋关节置换术仍安全吗?来自新西兰关节注册中心的一项16年队列研究。
ANZ J Surg. 2018 Dec;88(12):1289-1293. doi: 10.1111/ans.14864. Epub 2018 Oct 22.
10
Simultaneous Versus Staged Bilateral Hip Arthroscopy in the Treatment of Femoroacetabular Impingement.同期双侧与分期双侧髋关节镜检查治疗股骨髋臼撞击症
Arthroscopy. 2016 Jul;32(7):1300-7. doi: 10.1016/j.arthro.2016.01.047. Epub 2016 Apr 27.

引用本文的文献

1
Comparison of Per-Operative Outcomes between Simultaneous and Staged Bilateral Total Hip Arthroplasties.同期双侧与分期双侧全髋关节置换术的术中结果比较
J Orthop Case Rep. 2025 Jun;15(6):223-231. doi: 10.13107/jocr.2025.v15.i06.5722.
2
Effects of Lumbar Plexus Block Combined with Infiltration Anesthesia on Anesthesia Comfort Scores and Stress Responses in Elderly Patients Undergoing Hip Replacement.腰丛神经阻滞复合浸润麻醉对老年髋关节置换术患者麻醉舒适度及应激反应的影响。
Dis Markers. 2022 Aug 10;2022:8692966. doi: 10.1155/2022/8692966. eCollection 2022.
3
Simultaneous versus staged bilateral total hip arthroplasty: a systematic review and meta-analysis.同期双侧全髋关节置换术与分期双侧全髋关节置换术的比较:系统评价和荟萃分析。
J Orthop Surg Res. 2022 Aug 13;17(1):392. doi: 10.1186/s13018-022-03281-4.

本文引用的文献

1
Bilateral total hip arthroplasty: one-stage versus two-stage procedures.双侧全髋关节置换术:一期手术与二期手术对比
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2006 Dec;453:137-41. doi: 10.1097/01.blo.0000246529.14135.2b.
2
One- or two-stage bilateral total hip arthroplasty: a prospective, randomised, controlled study in an Asian population.一期或二期双侧全髋关节置换术:一项针对亚洲人群的前瞻性、随机对照研究。
J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2006 Mar;88(3):298-303. doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.88B3.17048.
3
Simultaneous bilateral versus unilateral total hip arthroplasty an outcomes analysis.同期双侧与单侧全髋关节置换术的疗效分析
J Arthroplasty. 2005 Jun;20(4):421-6. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2004.09.062.
4
Dislocation after total hip arthroplasty.全髋关节置换术后脱位
J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2004 Sep-Oct;12(5):314-21. doi: 10.5435/00124635-200409000-00006.
5
Statistics review 4: sample size calculations.统计学综述4:样本量计算
Crit Care. 2002 Aug;6(4):335-41. doi: 10.1186/cc1521. Epub 2002 May 10.
6
Single-stage bilateral total hip arthroplasty.
J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2002 May-Jun;10(3):217-21. doi: 10.5435/00124635-200205000-00008.
7
One- or two-stage bilateral total hip replacement.
J Arthroplasty. 1999 Jun;14(4):439-45. doi: 10.1016/s0883-5403(99)90099-2.
8
Bilateral total hip arthroplasty: one stage versus two stage procedure.双侧全髋关节置换术:一期手术与二期手术对比
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1996 Jul(328):108-18.
9
Bilateral total hip arthroplasty: a single procedure.双侧全髋关节置换术:单一手术
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1980 Jun(149):185-90.
10
Bilateral Charnley arthroplasty as a single procedure. A report on 400 patients.
J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1981;63-B(3):354-6. doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.63B3.7263745.