Galaitsi Stephanie, Kurth Margaret, Linkov Igor
US Army Corps of Engineers Engineer Research & Development Center Environmental Lab Concord MA USA.
Geohealth. 2021 Nov 1;5(11):e2021GH000447. doi: 10.1029/2021GH000447. eCollection 2021 Nov.
The concept of resilience is multi-faceted. This commentary builds upon the analytical distinctions of resilience provided by Urquiza et al. (2021, https://doi.org/10.1029/2020EF001508). In response to this article, we emphasize several distinctions between resilience and other systems concepts. These include distinctions between resilience, risk, and vulnerability, the tradeoff between resilience and efficiency, resilience contrasted with robustness, the relationship between resilience and sustainability, and finally methods for building resilience-by-design or resilience-by-intervention. Improving understanding of these concepts will enable planners to select resilience strategies that best support their system goals. We use examples from the 2020-2021 coronavirus pandemic to illustrate the concepts and the juxtapositions between them.
恢复力的概念是多方面的。本评论基于乌尔基萨等人(2021年,https://doi.org/10.1029/2020EF001508)对恢复力所做的分析性区分。针对这篇文章,我们强调了恢复力与其他系统概念之间的几个区别。这些区别包括恢复力、风险和脆弱性之间的区别,恢复力与效率之间的权衡,恢复力与稳健性的对比,恢复力与可持续性之间的关系,以及最后通过设计构建恢复力或通过干预构建恢复力的方法。增进对这些概念的理解将使规划者能够选择最能支持其系统目标的恢复力策略。我们使用2020 - 2021年新冠疫情的例子来说明这些概念以及它们之间的并列关系。