Suppr超能文献

Gamma3 钉治疗囊外骨折的远端锁定的长期结果。

Long-term outcomes of distal locking in extracapsular fractures treated with trochanteric Gamma3 nails.

机构信息

Department of Trauma and Orthopaedic Surgery, Hospital Universitario de Salamanca, Pso. San Vicente 58-182, 37004, Salamanca, Spain.

Department of Radiology, Hospital Universitario de Salamanca, Pso. San Vicente 58-182, 37004, Salamanca, Spain.

出版信息

J Orthop Traumatol. 2021 Nov 26;22(1):48. doi: 10.1186/s10195-021-00609-4.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Few publications have assessed long-term results of distal locking of short endomedullary nails for extracapsular hip fracture. Virtually all of them focus on immediate differences. Criteria for the use of static or dynamic locking are unclear in most nailing systems, and use is advised in unstable fracture patterns or with risk of bell-clapper effect, but often influenced by the "orthopaedic school".

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This is a historical cohort study on patients diagnosed and operated in 2014 and followed up until endpoint, considered as consolidation or major complication, plus evaluation of overall long-term survival. They were categorised as static distal locking (ST) or dynamic distal locking (DN). Both are comparable, except for all stable pre-operative classifications, Fracture Mobility Score (FMS) at discharge, and immediate post-operative loading, all of which were in favour of DN.

RESULTS

Consolidation took place in > 95% of patients, with a non-statistically significant delay trend in ST. Less than 6% in both ST and DN had major complications, with no differences. Most cases suffered early cut-out. Significant fracture collapse was the most frequent minor complication. There were more statistically significant minor and total complications in ST. Infection, without differences, can precede cut-out. Lateral thigh pain was similar and could be related to back-out. In DN, 21.1% of cases were truly dynamised. We did not find differences in mobility or in long-term survival.

CONCLUSIONS

Any type of distal locking seems to be safe for consolidation, despite a slightly longer consolidation time in static locking. Early cut-out was the main complication, while others were very infrequent, which is an advantage over helical blade devices. There was a higher rate of minor and overall mechanical complications in ST, but infection and lateral thigh pain were similar. Most non-traumatic mechanical complications occurred around 5-6 weeks. About one in five of the DN truly dynamised, with all cases occurring before 8 weeks. Mobility until endpoint and overall long-term survival were not influenced by the locking mode used.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Therapeutic study, level 2b.

摘要

背景

很少有出版物评估过用于囊外髋部骨折的短髓内钉远端锁定的长期结果。几乎所有出版物都集中在即时差异上。在大多数钉系统中,使用静态或动态锁定的标准尚不清楚,并且建议在不稳定的骨折模式或存在钟摆效应风险时使用,但通常受“骨科学校”的影响。

材料和方法

这是一项历史队列研究,研究对象为 2014 年诊断和手术的患者,并随访至终点,终点被认为是骨痂形成或主要并发症,同时评估总体长期生存率。他们被分为静态远端锁定(ST)或动态远端锁定(DN)。两者除了所有术前稳定分类、出院时的骨折活动评分(FMS)和即时术后负重外,其余均相似,而这些都有利于 DN。

结果

超过 95%的患者发生骨痂形成,ST 有非统计学意义的延迟趋势。ST 和 DN 的主要并发症均小于 6%,无差异。大多数病例早期发生切割脱出。明显的骨折塌陷是最常见的轻微并发症。ST 中存在更多统计学意义上的轻微和总并发症。无差异的感染可能先于切割脱出。外侧大腿疼痛相似,可能与退出有关。DN 中,21.1%的病例真正实现了动力化。我们没有发现移动度或长期生存率的差异。

结论

任何类型的远端锁定似乎都能安全促进骨痂形成,尽管静态锁定的骨痂形成时间稍长。早期切割脱出是主要并发症,而其他并发症非常罕见,这是优于螺旋刀片装置的优势。ST 中的轻微和总机械并发症发生率较高,但感染和外侧大腿疼痛相似。大多数非创伤性机械并发症发生在 5-6 周左右。DN 中约有五分之一真正实现了动力化,所有病例均发生在 8 周之前。直至终点的活动度和总体长期生存率不受使用的锁定模式影响。

证据水平

治疗研究,2b 级。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/666e/8626549/637f824fa649/10195_2021_609_Fig1_HTML.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验