Nuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, University of Oxford, Radcliffe Primary Care Building, Radcliffe Observatory Quarter, Woodstock Road, Oxford, OX2 6GG, UK.
Nuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, University of Oxford, Radcliffe Primary Care Building, Radcliffe Observatory Quarter, Woodstock Road, Oxford, OX2 6GG, UK.
Appetite. 2022 Feb 1;169:105824. doi: 10.1016/j.appet.2021.105824. Epub 2021 Nov 23.
Perceptions of social norms around eating behavior can influence food choices. Communicating information about how others are changing their eating behavior over time (dynamic descriptive social norms) may motivate individuals to change their own food selection and consumption. Following a four-week baseline period, 22 in-store restaurants of a major retail chain across the UK were randomized to display a dynamic descriptive social norm message intended to motivate a shift from meat-to plant-based meals either during the first two, or last two weeks of the four-week study period. A linear regression model showed there was no evidence of an effect of the intervention (β = -0.022, p = .978, 95% CIs: -1.63, 1.58) on the percentage sales of meat- vs plant-based dishes. Fidelity checks indicated that adherence to the intervention procedure was often low, with inconsistencies in the placement and display of the intervention message. In four stores with high fidelity the estimated impact of the intervention was not materially different. The lack of apparent effectiveness of the intervention may reflect poor efficacy of the intervention or limitations in its implementation in a complex food purchasing environment. The challenges highlighted by this study should be considered in future design and evaluation of field trials in real-world settings.
人们对于饮食行为的社会规范认知会影响食物选择。传达有关他人随时间变化而改变饮食行为的信息(动态描述性社会规范)可能会促使个体改变自己的食物选择和消费。在为期四周的基线期之后,英国一家大型零售连锁店的 22 家店内餐厅被随机分配,在四周研究期的前两周或后两周内展示一条旨在促使从肉制餐转向植物基餐的动态描述性社会规范信息。线性回归模型显示,干预措施没有产生效果的证据(β=-0.022,p=.978,95%CI:-1.63,1.58),即干预措施对肉制餐与植物基餐的销售百分比没有影响。可信度检查表明,干预措施的遵守情况通常较低,干预信息的放置和展示不一致。在四家遵守度高的商店中,干预措施的估计影响没有明显差异。干预措施缺乏明显效果可能反映出干预措施的效果不佳,或者在复杂的食品购买环境中实施存在限制。本研究强调的挑战应在未来的现场试验设计和评估中考虑。