School of Psychology, University of Birmingham, Edgbaston, Birmingham, B15 2TT, UK; Now at School of Management, University of Bath, Claverton Down, Bath, BA2 7AY, UK.
School of Psychology, University of Birmingham, Edgbaston, Birmingham, B15 2TT, UK; Now at the Department of Psychology, Aston University, Birmingham, B4 7ET, UK.
Appetite. 2019 Jan 1;132:122-130. doi: 10.1016/j.appet.2018.09.024. Epub 2018 Oct 1.
There is some evidence from laboratory-based studies that descriptive social-norm messages are associated with increased consumption of vegetables, but evidence of their effectiveness in real-world settings is limited. In two observational field studies taking an ecological approach, a vegetable-related social norm (e.g. "Did you know that most students here choose to eat vegetables with their meal?"), and a health message (e.g. "Did you know that students who choose to eat vegetables have a lower risk of heart disease?") were displayed in two different student canteens. Purchases were observed during three stages: baseline, intervention (when the posters were displayed) and immediate post-intervention (when the posters had been removed). Study 1 (n = 7598) observed the purchase of meals containing a portion of vegetables and Study 2 (n = 4052) observed the purchase of side portions of vegetables. In Study 1, relative to baseline, the social-norms intervention was associated with an increase in purchases of vegetables (from 63% to 68% of meals; OR = 1.24, CI = 1.03-1.49), which was sustained post-intervention (67% of meals; OR = 0.96, CI = 0.80-1.15). There was no effect of the health message (75% of meals at baseline, and 74% during the intervention; OR = 0.98, CI = 0.83-1.15). In Study 2, relative to baseline, there was an effect of both the social norm (22.9% of meals at baseline, rising to 32.5% during the intervention; OR = 1.62, CI = 1.27-2.05) and health message (rising from 43.8% at baseline to 52.8%; OR = 0.59, CI = 0.46-0.75). The increase was not sustained post-intervention for the social norm intervention (22.1%; OR = 0.59, CI = 0.46-0.75), but was sustained for the health intervention (48.1%; OR = 0.83, CI = 0.67-1.02). These results support further testing of the effectiveness of such messages in encouraging healthier eating and indicate the need for larger-scale testing at multiple sites using a randomised-controlled design.
有一些基于实验室研究的证据表明,描述性社会规范信息与蔬菜消费的增加有关,但在现实环境中其有效性的证据有限。在两项采用生态方法的观察性现场研究中,一种与蔬菜相关的社会规范(例如,“你知道这里的大多数学生选择在用餐时吃蔬菜吗?”)和一种健康信息(例如,“你知道选择吃蔬菜的学生患心脏病的风险较低吗?”)在两个不同的学生食堂展示。在三个阶段观察购买情况:基线、干预(海报展示时)和干预后立即(海报已移除时)。研究 1(n=7598)观察了包含一份蔬菜的餐食的购买情况,而研究 2(n=4052)观察了配菜的购买情况。在研究 1 中,与基线相比,社会规范干预与蔬菜购买量的增加有关(用餐中的蔬菜比例从 63%增加到 68%;OR=1.24,CI=1.03-1.49),这种增加在干预后持续存在(用餐中的蔬菜比例为 67%;OR=0.96,CI=0.80-1.15)。健康信息没有影响(基线时为 75%的餐食,干预时为 74%;OR=0.98,CI=0.83-1.15)。在研究 2 中,与基线相比,社会规范(基线时为 22.9%的餐食,干预时上升至 32.5%;OR=1.62,CI=1.27-2.05)和健康信息(从基线时的 43.8%上升至 52.8%;OR=0.59,CI=0.46-0.75)都有影响。社会规范干预的增加在干预后没有持续(22.1%;OR=0.59,CI=0.46-0.75),但健康干预的增加持续存在(48.1%;OR=0.83,CI=0.67-1.02)。这些结果支持进一步测试此类信息在鼓励更健康饮食方面的有效性,并表明需要在多个地点使用随机对照设计进行更大规模的测试。