• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

评估五种广泛使用的 SARS-CoV-2 抗体血清学检测方法。

Evaluation of five widely used serologic assays for antibodies to SARS-CoV-2.

机构信息

SYNLAB Analytics and Services Germany GmbH, Berlin, Germany.

SYNLAB Global Diagnostics, Alcobendas, Madrid, Spain.

出版信息

Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis. 2022 Feb;102(2):115587. doi: 10.1016/j.diagmicrobio.2021.115587. Epub 2021 Oct 29.

DOI:10.1016/j.diagmicrobio.2021.115587
PMID:34826767
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8554041/
Abstract

Reliable diagnostic technologies are pivotal to the fight against COVID-19. While real-time reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction (rRT-PCR) remains the gold standard, commercial assays for antibodies against (SARS-CoV-2) have emerged. We sought to examine 5 widely used commercial methods. We measured antibodies against SARS-CoV-2 with assays, Abbott-IgG, Roche-IgT (total antibodies, isotype-unspecific), EUROIMMUN-IgG, EUROIMMUN-IgA, DiaSorin-IgG, in 191 serum samples from patients with rRT-PCR proven COVID-19 between days 0 and 47 after the onset of clinical symptoms and in biobank samples collected in 2018. The assays were calibrated using the manufacturers' instructions; results are in multiples of the assay specific cut-offs (Abbott, Roche, EUROIMMUN) or in arbitrary units (AU/mL, DiaSorin). The assays for IgG and IgT have approximately the same sensitivity and specificity for detecting seroconversion which starts at approximately day 3 after symptom onset, sensitivity reached 93% on day 16 and was 100% for each assay on day 20. The assay for IgA antibodies was superior in sensitivity and had a lower specificity than the others. Bivariate non-parametric correlation coefficients ranged between 0.738 and 0.991. Commercial assays for IgG or total antibodies against SARS-CoV-2 are largely equivalent for establishing seroconversion but differ at high antibody titres. Increased sensitivity to detect seroconversion is afforded by including IgA antibodies. Further international efforts to harmonise assays for antibodies against SARS-CoV-2 are urgently needed.

摘要

可靠的诊断技术是抗击 COVID-19 的关键。虽然实时逆转录聚合酶链反应(rRT-PCR)仍然是金标准,但针对(SARS-CoV-2)的抗体的商业检测方法已经出现。我们试图研究 5 种广泛使用的商业方法。我们使用 Abbott-IgG、Roche-IgT(总抗体,非特异性同种型)、EUROIMMUN-IgG、EUROIMMUN-IgA、DiaSorin-IgG 这 5 种商业方法在 191 份来自临床症状出现后 0 至 47 天的 rRT-PCR 确诊 COVID-19 患者的血清样本以及 2018 年收集的生物库样本中测量针对 SARS-CoV-2 的抗体。根据制造商的说明校准检测方法;结果以检测到血清转化的检测方法特定截止值的倍数(Abbott、Roche、EUROIMMUN)或任意单位(AU/mL、DiaSorin)表示。针对 IgG 和 IgT 的检测方法在检测血清转化方面具有相似的敏感性和特异性,血清转化大约在症状出现后第 3 天开始,在第 16 天达到 93%的敏感性,在第 20 天每个检测方法的敏感性均为 100%。针对 IgA 抗体的检测方法在敏感性方面具有优势,特异性低于其他检测方法。双变量非参数相关系数在 0.738 到 0.991 之间。用于确定血清转化的 IgG 或针对 SARS-CoV-2 的总抗体的商业检测方法在很大程度上是等效的,但在高抗体滴度时有所不同。通过包括 IgA 抗体,可以提高检测血清转化的敏感性。迫切需要进一步开展国际努力来协调针对 SARS-CoV-2 的抗体检测方法。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/49fc/8554041/e7a4fe19a358/gr4_lrg.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/49fc/8554041/1e466e06681d/gr1_lrg.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/49fc/8554041/4adeecb1469b/gr2_lrg.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/49fc/8554041/ea22ab0bb0f2/gr3_lrg.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/49fc/8554041/e7a4fe19a358/gr4_lrg.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/49fc/8554041/1e466e06681d/gr1_lrg.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/49fc/8554041/4adeecb1469b/gr2_lrg.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/49fc/8554041/ea22ab0bb0f2/gr3_lrg.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/49fc/8554041/e7a4fe19a358/gr4_lrg.jpg

相似文献

1
Evaluation of five widely used serologic assays for antibodies to SARS-CoV-2.评估五种广泛使用的 SARS-CoV-2 抗体血清学检测方法。
Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis. 2022 Feb;102(2):115587. doi: 10.1016/j.diagmicrobio.2021.115587. Epub 2021 Oct 29.
2
Diagnostic performance of four SARS-CoV-2 antibody assays in patients with COVID-19 or with bacterial and non-SARS-CoV-2 viral respiratory infections.四种 SARS-CoV-2 抗体检测试剂在 COVID-19 患者及细菌性和非 SARS-CoV-2 病毒呼吸道感染患者中的诊断性能比较。
Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis. 2021 Sep;40(9):1983-1997. doi: 10.1007/s10096-021-04285-4. Epub 2021 Jun 9.
3
Comparison of six commercially available SARS-CoV-2 antibody assays-Choice of assay depends on intended use.六种市售 SARS-CoV-2 抗体检测试剂盒的比较——检测试剂盒的选择取决于预期用途。
Int J Infect Dis. 2021 Feb;103:381-388. doi: 10.1016/j.ijid.2020.12.017. Epub 2020 Dec 10.
4
Anti-SARS-CoV-2 IgM improves clinical sensitivity early in disease course.抗 SARS-CoV-2 IgM 可提高疾病早期的临床灵敏度。
Clin Biochem. 2021 Apr;90:1-7. doi: 10.1016/j.clinbiochem.2021.01.003. Epub 2021 Jan 19.
5
Closing the serological gap in the diagnostic testing for COVID-19: The value of anti-SARS-CoV-2 IgA antibodies.弥补 COVID-19 诊断检测中的血清学差距:抗 SARS-CoV-2 IgA 抗体的价值。
J Med Virol. 2021 Mar;93(3):1436-1442. doi: 10.1002/jmv.26422. Epub 2020 Aug 21.
6
Comparison of the Clinical Performances of the Abbott Alinity IgG, Abbott Architect IgM, and Roche Elecsys Total SARS-CoV-2 Antibody Assays.雅培 Alinity IgG、雅培 Architect IgM 和罗氏 Elecsys 总 SARS-CoV-2 抗体检测试剂的临床性能比较。
J Clin Microbiol. 2020 Dec 17;59(1). doi: 10.1128/JCM.02104-20.
7
Assessment of commercial SARS-CoV-2 antibody assays, Jamaica.牙买加对商用严重急性呼吸综合征冠状病毒2抗体检测的评估。
Int J Infect Dis. 2021 Apr;105:333-336. doi: 10.1016/j.ijid.2021.02.059. Epub 2021 Feb 18.
8
Differences in Performance Characteristics Among Four High-Throughput Assays for the Detection of Antibodies Against SARS-CoV-2 Using a Common Set of Patient Samples.使用相同的患者样本检测 SARS-CoV-2 抗体的四种高通量检测方法的性能特征差异。
Am J Clin Pathol. 2021 Feb 4;155(2):267-279. doi: 10.1093/ajcp/aqaa200.
9
Comparison of SARS-CoV-2 IgM and IgG seroconversion profiles among hospitalized patients in two US cities.美国两个城市住院患者中新冠病毒 IgM 和 IgG 血清转化情况的比较。
Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis. 2021 Apr;99(4):115300. doi: 10.1016/j.diagmicrobio.2020.115300. Epub 2020 Dec 24.
10
Antibody response against SARS-CoV-2 spike protein and nucleoprotein evaluated by four automated immunoassays and three ELISAs.四种自动化免疫分析和三种 ELISA 评估针对 SARS-CoV-2 刺突蛋白和核蛋白的抗体反应。
Clin Microbiol Infect. 2020 Nov;26(11):1557.e1-1557.e7. doi: 10.1016/j.cmi.2020.07.038. Epub 2020 Jul 31.

引用本文的文献

1
Diagnostic performance of rapid antigen testing for SARS-CoV-2: the COVid-19 AntiGen (COVAG) extension study.严重急性呼吸综合征冠状病毒2快速抗原检测的诊断性能:2019冠状病毒病抗原(COVAG)扩展研究
Front Med (Lausanne). 2024 Apr 16;11:1352633. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2024.1352633. eCollection 2024.
2
Sex difference in the discordance between Abbott Architect and EuroImmun serological assays.Abbott Architect 与 EuroImmun 血清学检测在不一致性方面的性别差异。
PeerJ. 2023 Jul 17;11:e15247. doi: 10.7717/peerj.15247. eCollection 2023.
3
Variation in antibody titers determined by Abbott and Roche Elecsys SARS-CoV-2 assays in vaccinated healthcare workers.

本文引用的文献

1
Early Viral Clearance and Antibody Kinetics of COVID-19 Among Asymptomatic Carriers.无症状携带者中 COVID-19 的早期病毒清除及抗体动力学
Front Med (Lausanne). 2021 Mar 15;8:595773. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2021.595773. eCollection 2021.
2
Estimating the false-negative test probability of SARS-CoV-2 by RT-PCR.估算 RT-PCR 检测 SARS-CoV-2 的假阴性率。
Euro Surveill. 2020 Dec;25(50). doi: 10.2807/1560-7917.ES.2020.25.50.2000568.
3
A systematic review of antibody mediated immunity to coronaviruses: kinetics, correlates of protection, and association with severity.
接种疫苗的医护人员中,由雅培和罗氏电化学发光法检测的新冠病毒抗体滴度的差异。
Heliyon. 2023 Jun;9(6):e16547. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e16547. Epub 2023 May 22.
4
Adult Patients with Cancer Have Impaired Humoral Responses to Complete and Booster COVID-19 Vaccination, Especially Those with Hematologic Cancer on Active Treatment: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.成年癌症患者对新冠病毒疫苗全程接种和加强针的体液免疫反应受损,尤其是正在接受积极治疗的血液系统癌症患者:一项系统评价和荟萃分析。
Cancers (Basel). 2023 Apr 12;15(8):2266. doi: 10.3390/cancers15082266.
5
Comparison of the measured values of quantitative SARS-CoV-2 spike antibody assays.定量 SARS-CoV-2 刺突抗体检测方法测量值的比较。
J Clin Virol. 2022 Oct;155:105269. doi: 10.1016/j.jcv.2022.105269. Epub 2022 Aug 19.
冠状病毒抗体介导免疫的系统评价:动力学、保护相关性及与严重程度的关系。
Nat Commun. 2020 Sep 17;11(1):4704. doi: 10.1038/s41467-020-18450-4.
4
Antibody tests for identification of current and past infection with SARS-CoV-2.用于识别当前和既往感染新型冠状病毒2的抗体检测。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020 Jun 25;6(6):CD013652. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013652.
5
Challenges in Laboratory Diagnosis of the Novel Coronavirus SARS-CoV-2.新型冠状病毒 SARS-CoV-2 实验室诊断面临的挑战。
Viruses. 2020 May 26;12(6):582. doi: 10.3390/v12060582.
6
Variation in False-Negative Rate of Reverse Transcriptase Polymerase Chain Reaction-Based SARS-CoV-2 Tests by Time Since Exposure.基于时间的暴露后,逆转录聚合酶链反应(RT-PCR)检测 SARS-CoV-2 的假阴性率的变化。
Ann Intern Med. 2020 Aug 18;173(4):262-267. doi: 10.7326/M20-1495. Epub 2020 May 13.
7
Neutralizing antibody response in mild COVID-19.轻度新冠肺炎中的中和抗体反应。
Nat Rev Immunol. 2020 Jun;20(6):352. doi: 10.1038/s41577-020-0325-2.
8
Successful containment of Covid-19 outbreak in a large maternity and perinatal center while continuing clinical service.在继续提供临床服务的同时,成功控制了一家大型妇产中心的新冠疫情爆发。
Pediatr Allergy Immunol. 2020 Jul;31(5):560-564. doi: 10.1111/pai.13265. Epub 2020 May 17.
9
Different longitudinal patterns of nucleic acid and serology testing results based on disease severity of COVID-19 patients.基于 COVID-19 患者疾病严重程度的核酸和血清学检测结果的不同纵向模式。
Emerg Microbes Infect. 2020 Dec;9(1):833-836. doi: 10.1080/22221751.2020.1756699.
10
Spread of SARS-CoV-2 in the Icelandic Population.SARS-CoV-2 在冰岛人群中的传播。
N Engl J Med. 2020 Jun 11;382(24):2302-2315. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa2006100. Epub 2020 Apr 14.