Institute of Heart Diseases, University Hospital, 50-556 Wroclaw, Poland.
Institute of Heart Diseases, Medical University, 50-556 Wroclaw, Poland.
Biomolecules. 2021 Nov 16;11(11):1701. doi: 10.3390/biom11111701.
The perception of acute heart failure (AHF) as a single entity is increasingly outdated, as distinct patient profiles can be discerned. Key heart failure (HF) studies have previously highlighted the difference in both the course and prognosis of de novo AHF and acute decompensated chronic HF (ADHF). Accordingly, distinct AHF profiles with differing underlying pathophysiologies of disease progression can be shown. We compared a range of selected biomarkers in order to better describe the profile of de novo AHF and ADHF, including the inter alia-serum lactate, bilirubin, matrix metallopeptidase 9 (MMP-9), follistatin, intercellular adhesion molecule 1 (ICAM-1), lipocalin and galectin-3. The study comprised 248 AHF patients (de novo = 104), who were followed up for one year. The biomarker data of the de novo AHF and ADHF profiles was then compared in order to link biomarkers to their prognosis. Our study demonstrated that, although there are similarities between each patient profile, key biomarker differences do exist-predominantly in terms of NTproBNP, serum lactate, bilirubin, ICAM-1, follistatin, ferritin and sTfR (soluble transferrin receptor). ADHF tended to have compromised organ function and higher risks of both one-year mortality and composite endpoint (one-year mortality or rehospitalization for heart failure) hazard ratios (HR) (95% CI): 3.4 (1.8-6.3) and 2.8 (1.6-4.6), respectively, both < 0.0001. Among the biomarkers of interest: sTfR HR (95% CI): 1.4 (1.04-1.8), NGAL (neutrophil gelatinase-associated lipocalin) HR (95% CI): 2.0 (1.3-3.1) and GDF-15 (growth/differentiation factor-15) HR (95% CI): 4.0 (1.2-13.0) significantly impacted the one-year survival, all < 0.05.
急性心力衰竭(AHF)作为单一实体的概念已逐渐过时,因为可以区分不同的患者特征。先前的关键心力衰竭(HF)研究强调了新发 AHF 和急性失代偿性慢性 HF(ADHF)在病程和预后方面的差异。因此,可以显示出具有不同潜在疾病进展病理生理学的不同 AHF 特征。我们比较了一系列选定的生物标志物,以便更好地描述新发 AHF 和 ADHF 的特征,包括但不限于血清乳酸、胆红素、基质金属蛋白酶 9(MMP-9)、卵泡抑素、细胞间黏附分子 1(ICAM-1)、脂联素和半乳糖凝集素-3。这项研究纳入了 248 名 AHF 患者(新发 AHF=104 例),并对其进行了为期一年的随访。然后比较了新发 AHF 和 ADHF 特征的生物标志物数据,以将生物标志物与其预后联系起来。我们的研究表明,尽管每个患者特征之间存在相似之处,但关键生物标志物确实存在差异,主要表现在 NTproBNP、血清乳酸、胆红素、ICAM-1、卵泡抑素、铁蛋白和 sTfR(可溶性转铁蛋白受体)方面。ADHF 往往存在器官功能受损,且一年死亡率和复合终点(一年死亡率或因心力衰竭再次住院)的风险比(HR)(95%CI)较高:分别为 3.4(1.8-6.3)和 2.8(1.6-4.6),均 < 0.0001。在感兴趣的生物标志物中:sTfR HR(95%CI):1.4(1.04-1.8),NGAL(中性粒细胞明胶酶相关脂质运载蛋白)HR(95%CI):2.0(1.3-3.1)和 GDF-15(生长/分化因子-15)HR(95%CI):4.0(1.2-13.0)对一年生存率有显著影响,均 < 0.05。