• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

从头到尾让乖狗狗保持健康:了解美国消费者对宠物食品属性的偏好。

It Keeps the Good Boy Healthy from Nose to Tail: Understanding Pet Food Attribute Preferences of US Consumers.

作者信息

Rombach Meike, Dean David L

机构信息

Department of Land Management and Systems, Lincoln University, Lincoln 7647, New Zealand.

Department of Agribusiness and Markets, Lincoln University, Lincoln 7647, New Zealand.

出版信息

Animals (Basel). 2021 Nov 19;11(11):3301. doi: 10.3390/ani11113301.

DOI:10.3390/ani11113301
PMID:34828032
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8614497/
Abstract

The study provides insights for marketing managers in specialized pet supplies retailers, as well as for vets and animal welfare organizations. This study proposes a model that investigates the importance pet owners place on convenience, natural ingredients, and value and health claims as product attributes. For this purpose, an online survey with a sample size of 206 pet-owning US residents was conducted. Partial least squares structural equation modelling shows that pet food purchase involvement positively impacts subjective and objective knowledge about pet food. Subjective knowledge appears to be the strongest factor impacting the importance consumers place on all three attributes. This is followed by objective knowledge. Socio-demographic factors such as gender, age, income, and education appear to have a limited impact as predictors for the importance consumers place on the product attributes.

摘要

该研究为专业宠物用品零售商的营销经理以及兽医和动物福利组织提供了见解。本研究提出了一个模型,该模型调查了宠物主人对便利性、天然成分以及产品属性的价值和健康声明的重视程度。为此,对206名拥有宠物的美国居民进行了一项在线调查。偏最小二乘结构方程模型表明,宠物食品购买参与度对宠物食品的主观和客观知识有积极影响。主观知识似乎是影响消费者对所有三个属性重视程度的最强因素。其次是客观知识。性别、年龄、收入和教育等社会人口因素作为消费者对产品属性重视程度的预测因素,其影响似乎有限。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bc2d/8614497/a9315537f631/animals-11-03301-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bc2d/8614497/2eb7133af157/animals-11-03301-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bc2d/8614497/a9315537f631/animals-11-03301-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bc2d/8614497/2eb7133af157/animals-11-03301-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bc2d/8614497/a9315537f631/animals-11-03301-g002.jpg

相似文献

1
It Keeps the Good Boy Healthy from Nose to Tail: Understanding Pet Food Attribute Preferences of US Consumers.从头到尾让乖狗狗保持健康:了解美国消费者对宠物食品属性的偏好。
Animals (Basel). 2021 Nov 19;11(11):3301. doi: 10.3390/ani11113301.
2
Just Love Me, Feed Me, Never Leave Me: Understanding Pet Food Anxiety, Feeding and Shopping Behavior of US Pet Owners in Covidian Times.只要爱我、喂养我、永不离开我:了解新冠疫情时期美国宠物主人的宠物食品焦虑、喂养及购物行为。
Animals (Basel). 2021 Oct 30;11(11):3101. doi: 10.3390/ani11113101.
3
Understanding Apple Attribute Preferences of US Consumers.了解美国消费者对苹果属性的偏好。
Foods. 2022 Jan 9;11(2):166. doi: 10.3390/foods11020166.
4
A systematic review of factors that influence food store owner and manager decision making and ability or willingness to use choice architecture and marketing mix strategies to encourage healthy consumer purchases in the United States, 2005-2017.一项系统回顾,分析了影响食品店店主和经理决策的因素,以及他们使用选择架构和营销组合策略来鼓励美国消费者健康购买的能力或意愿,时间跨度为 2005 年至 2017 年。
Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2019 Jan 14;16(1):5. doi: 10.1186/s12966-019-0767-8.
5
Perceptions of Animal Welfare With a Special Focus on Turkeys.对动物福利的认知,特别关注火鸡。
Front Vet Sci. 2019 Nov 21;6:413. doi: 10.3389/fvets.2019.00413. eCollection 2019.
6
Signaling Green: Impact of Green Product Attributes on Consumers Trust and the Mediating Role of Green Marketing.信号绿色:绿色产品属性对消费者信任的影响及绿色营销的中介作用。
Front Psychol. 2022 Aug 2;13:790272. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.790272. eCollection 2022.
7
Can dogs help chickens? Pet owners' willingness to pay for animal welfare-friendly pet food in the United States.狗能帮助鸡吗?美国宠物主人为有利于动物福利的宠物食品支付费用的意愿。
Anim Welf. 2023 Jan 30;32:e11. doi: 10.1017/awf.2022.3. eCollection 2023.
8
Consumers' Preferences towards Bread Characteristics Based on Food-Related Lifestyles: Insights from Slovenia.基于与食品相关生活方式的消费者对面包特性的偏好:来自斯洛文尼亚的见解
Foods. 2023 Oct 13;12(20):3766. doi: 10.3390/foods12203766.
9
The roles of pollution concerns and environmental knowledge in making green food choices: Evidence from Chinese consumers.污染关注和环境知识在选择绿色食品中的作用:来自中国消费者的证据。
Food Res Int. 2020 Apr;130:108881. doi: 10.1016/j.foodres.2019.108881. Epub 2019 Dec 5.
10
Identification and characterization of fluid milk consumer groups.液态奶消费者群体的识别和特征分析。
J Dairy Sci. 2018 Oct;101(10):8860-8874. doi: 10.3168/jds.2018-14855. Epub 2018 Aug 9.

引用本文的文献

1
How pet food selection attributes influence customer satisfaction and loyalty: evidence from South Korea.宠物食品选择属性如何影响顾客满意度和忠诚度:来自韩国的证据。
Front Nutr. 2025 Jul 30;12:1576518. doi: 10.3389/fnut.2025.1576518. eCollection 2025.
2
Theory of Planned Behavior applied to the choice of food with preservatives by owners and for their dogs.计划行为理论在主人及其宠物狗选择含防腐剂食品中的应用。
PLoS One. 2024 Jan 19;19(1):e0294044. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0294044. eCollection 2024.
3
Biogenic Amine Content Analysis of Three Chicken-Based Dry Pet Food Formulations.

本文引用的文献

1
Just Love Me, Feed Me, Never Leave Me: Understanding Pet Food Anxiety, Feeding and Shopping Behavior of US Pet Owners in Covidian Times.只要爱我、喂养我、永不离开我:了解新冠疫情时期美国宠物主人的宠物食品焦虑、喂养及购物行为。
Animals (Basel). 2021 Oct 30;11(11):3101. doi: 10.3390/ani11113101.
2
Perceived subjective versus objective knowledge: Consumer valuation of genetically modified certification on food producing plants.感知的主观知识与客观知识:消费者对食品生产植物的转基因认证的评价。
PLoS One. 2021 Aug 19;16(8):e0255406. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0255406. eCollection 2021.
3
Vegan versus meat-based pet foods: Owner-reported palatability behaviours and implications for canine and feline welfare.
三种鸡肉基干宠物食品配方的生物胺含量分析
Animals (Basel). 2023 Jun 10;13(12):1945. doi: 10.3390/ani13121945.
4
The Hard Choice about Dry Pet Food: Comparison of Protein and Lipid Nutritional Qualities and Digestibility of Three Different Chicken-Based Formulations.关于干宠物食品的艰难选择:三种不同鸡肉配方的蛋白质和脂质营养质量及消化率比较
Animals (Basel). 2022 Jun 14;12(12):1538. doi: 10.3390/ani12121538.
素食与以肉为基础的宠物食品:主人报告的适口性行为及其对犬猫福利的影响。
PLoS One. 2021 Jun 16;16(6):e0253292. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0253292. eCollection 2021.
4
A review: nutrition and process attributes of corn in pet foods.综述:宠物食品中玉米的营养和加工特性。
Crit Rev Food Sci Nutr. 2022;62(31):8567-8576. doi: 10.1080/10408398.2021.1931020. Epub 2021 Jun 3.
5
Grains on the brain: A survey of dog owner purchasing habits related to grain-free dry dog foods.谷物与大脑:一项关于犬主购买无谷物干粮相关习惯的调查。
PLoS One. 2021 May 19;16(5):e0250806. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0250806. eCollection 2021.
6
Insights into Commercial Pet Foods.商业宠物食品的洞察。
Vet Clin North Am Small Anim Pract. 2021 May;51(3):551-562. doi: 10.1016/j.cvsm.2021.01.013.
7
Pros and Cons of Commercial Pet Foods (Including Grain/Grain Free) for Dogs and Cats.商业宠物食品(包括含谷物/无谷物)对犬猫的利与弊。
Vet Clin North Am Small Anim Pract. 2021 May;51(3):529-550. doi: 10.1016/j.cvsm.2021.01.009.
8
Horses are sensitive to baby talk: pet-directed speech facilitates communication with humans in a pointing task and during grooming.马对儿语很敏感:在指示任务和梳理毛发时,宠物导向的语言促进了与人类的交流。
Anim Cogn. 2021 Sep;24(5):999-1006. doi: 10.1007/s10071-021-01487-3. Epub 2021 Mar 18.
9
An Alternative Approach to Evaluate the Quality of Protein-Based Raw Materials for Dry Pet Food.一种评估干宠物食品蛋白质基原料质量的替代方法。
Animals (Basel). 2021 Feb 9;11(2):458. doi: 10.3390/ani11020458.
10
A Survey among Dog and Cat Owners on Pet Food Storage and Preservation in the Households.一项针对猫狗主人的家庭宠物食品储存与保存情况的调查。
Animals (Basel). 2021 Jan 21;11(2):273. doi: 10.3390/ani11020273.