• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

狗能帮助鸡吗?美国宠物主人为有利于动物福利的宠物食品支付费用的意愿。

Can dogs help chickens? Pet owners' willingness to pay for animal welfare-friendly pet food in the United States.

作者信息

Pearce Hillary, Neill Clinton L, Royal Kenneth, Pairis-Garcia Monique

机构信息

London SW19 1BW, UK.

Department of Population Medicine and Diagnostic Sciences, Cornell University College of Veterinary Medicine, Ithaca, NY 14853, USA.

出版信息

Anim Welf. 2023 Jan 30;32:e11. doi: 10.1017/awf.2022.3. eCollection 2023.

DOI:10.1017/awf.2022.3
PMID:38487449
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10936380/
Abstract

Consumer concern about farmed animal welfare is growing but does not always translate into real-world purchasing behaviour of welfare-friendly animal products for human consumption. Possible reasons for this include unfamiliarity with farming practices and economic sensitivity. In contrast, the number and role of pets in the United States have grown measurably, and spending on pets is strong. The pet food market has many opportunity niches as pet owners navigate strong marketing trends and nutrition philosophies. We hypothesised that pet owners in the US would be willing to pay a premium for pet food containing welfare-friendly animal ingredients. Eight hundred and thirty-eight pet owners completed an online survey asking questions that measured their knowledge of and interest in farm animal welfare, and their willingness-to-pay for pet food labelled as farm animal welfare-friendly. Respondents overall displayed relatively low knowledge about farm animal welfare, but poor self-assessment of their own knowledge. They displayed interest in farm animal welfare and an overall positive mean willingness-to-pay (WTP) for welfare-friendly pet food. Younger respondents, women and cat owners displayed a higher WTP than older respondents, men and dog owners. Income level was not correlated to WTP. Creating pet food products that contain animal ingredients produced using welfare-friendly practices may enhance farm animal welfare via two primary avenues: by providing a sustainable and value-added outlet for the by-products of welfare-friendly human food products, and by providing an educational opportunity about farm animal production via pet food packaging and other advertising.

摘要

消费者对养殖动物福利的关注日益增加,但这并不总是转化为购买有利于动物福利的人类消费动物产品的实际行为。造成这种情况的可能原因包括对养殖方式不熟悉以及经济敏感性。相比之下,美国宠物的数量和作用显著增加,宠物消费强劲。随着宠物主人顺应强大的营销趋势和营养理念,宠物食品市场有许多机会细分领域。我们假设美国的宠物主人愿意为含有有利于动物福利成分的宠物食品支付溢价。838名宠物主人完成了一项在线调查,调查问题衡量了他们对农场动物福利的了解和兴趣,以及他们为标有农场动物福利友好型的宠物食品支付的意愿。总体而言,受访者对农场动物福利的了解相对较少,但对自己知识的自我评估较差。他们对农场动物福利表现出兴趣,并且对有利于动物福利的宠物食品总体上有积极的平均支付意愿(WTP)。年轻受访者、女性和猫主人的支付意愿高于年长受访者、男性和狗主人。收入水平与支付意愿无关。生产含有采用有利于动物福利方式生产的动物成分的宠物食品,可能通过两条主要途径提高农场动物福利:为有利于动物福利的人类食品副产品提供可持续的增值销售渠道,以及通过宠物食品包装和其他广告提供有关农场动物生产的教育机会。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e728/10936380/2a667855e719/S0962728622000033_fig3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e728/10936380/1c813fd7f329/S0962728622000033_fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e728/10936380/308e9c2c85c7/S0962728622000033_fig2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e728/10936380/2a667855e719/S0962728622000033_fig3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e728/10936380/1c813fd7f329/S0962728622000033_fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e728/10936380/308e9c2c85c7/S0962728622000033_fig2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e728/10936380/2a667855e719/S0962728622000033_fig3.jpg

相似文献

1
Can dogs help chickens? Pet owners' willingness to pay for animal welfare-friendly pet food in the United States.狗能帮助鸡吗?美国宠物主人为有利于动物福利的宠物食品支付费用的意愿。
Anim Welf. 2023 Jan 30;32:e11. doi: 10.1017/awf.2022.3. eCollection 2023.
2
Online procurement of pet supplies and willingness to pay for veterinary telemedicine.宠物用品在线采购和对兽医远程医疗的支付意愿。
Prev Vet Med. 2020 Aug;181:105073. doi: 10.1016/j.prevetmed.2020.105073. Epub 2020 Jun 20.
3
BIOETHICS SYMPOSIUM II: current factors influencing perceptions of animals and their welfare.生物伦理学研讨会二:影响动物认知及其福利的当前因素
J Anim Sci. 2014 May;92(5):1821-31. doi: 10.2527/jas.2014-7586. Epub 2014 Mar 26.
4
Profiling Italian cat and dog owners' perceptions of pet food quality traits.分析意大利猫和狗主人对宠物食品质量特征的看法。
BMC Vet Res. 2020 May 11;16(1):131. doi: 10.1186/s12917-020-02357-9.
5
Risk of Foodborne Illness from Pet Food: Assessing Pet Owners' Knowledge, Behavior, and Risk Perception.宠物食品导致食源性疾病的风险:评估宠物主人的知识、行为和风险认知。
J Food Prot. 2020 Nov;83(11):1998-2007. doi: 10.4315/JFP-20-108. Epub 2020 Jul 1.
6
Willingness to Pay a Higher Price for Pork Obtained Using Animal-Friendly Raising Techniques: A Consumers' Opinion Survey.为采用动物友好型饲养技术获得的猪肉支付更高价格的意愿:一项消费者意见调查。
Foods. 2023 Nov 21;12(23):4201. doi: 10.3390/foods12234201.
7
Survey to investigate pet ownership and attitudes to pet care in metropolitan Chicago dog and/or cat owners.调查都市芝加哥的狗和/或猫主人对宠物拥有和宠物护理的态度。
Prev Vet Med. 2014 Aug 1;115(3-4):198-204. doi: 10.1016/j.prevetmed.2014.03.025. Epub 2014 Apr 4.
8
Plant-based (vegan) diets for pets: A survey of pet owner attitudes and feeding practices.宠物的植物性(素食)饮食:宠物主人态度和喂养实践的调查。
PLoS One. 2019 Jan 15;14(1):e0210806. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0210806. eCollection 2019.
9
Consumer trust and willingness to pay for establishing a market-based animal welfare assurance scheme for broiler chickens.消费者对建立基于市场的肉鸡动物福利保证计划的信任和支付意愿。
Poult Sci. 2023 Jul;102(7):102765. doi: 10.1016/j.psj.2023.102765. Epub 2023 Apr 29.
10
Pet Owners' Attitudes and Opinions towards Cat and Dog Care Practices in Aotearoa New Zealand.新西兰奥特亚罗瓦地区宠物主人对猫和狗护理做法的态度及看法。
Vet Sci. 2023 Oct 4;10(10):606. doi: 10.3390/vetsci10100606.

引用本文的文献

1
A Model for Consumer Acceptance of Insect-Based Dog Foods among Adult UK Dog Owners.英国成年养狗者对昆虫基狗粮的消费者接受度模型。
Animals (Basel). 2024 Mar 27;14(7):1021. doi: 10.3390/ani14071021.
2
Potential demand for National Health Insurance in Zimbabwe: Evidence from selected urban informal sector clusters in Harare.津巴布韦国家健康保险的潜在需求:来自哈拉雷部分城市非正规部门集群的证据。
PLoS One. 2023 May 30;18(5):e0286374. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0286374. eCollection 2023.

本文引用的文献

1
Plant-based (vegan) diets for pets: A survey of pet owner attitudes and feeding practices.宠物的植物性(素食)饮食:宠物主人态度和喂养实践的调查。
PLoS One. 2019 Jan 15;14(1):e0210806. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0210806. eCollection 2019.
2
COMPANION ANIMALS SYMPOSIUM: Rendered ingredients significantly influence sustainability, quality, and safety of pet food.伴侣动物研讨会:加工成分对宠物食品的可持续性、质量和安全性有显著影响。
J Anim Sci. 2015 Mar;93(3):835-47. doi: 10.2527/jas.2014-8524.
3
Effects of demographic factors and information sources on United States consumer perceptions of animal welfare.
人口因素和信息来源对美国消费者动物福利认知的影响。
J Anim Sci. 2014 Jul;92(7):3161-73. doi: 10.2527/jas.2014-6874.
4
A meaty matter. Pet diet and the vegetarian's dilemma.一个实质性的问题。宠物饮食与素食者的困境。
Appetite. 2013 Sep;68:76-82. doi: 10.1016/j.appet.2013.04.012. Epub 2013 Apr 22.
5
The effects of information on willingness to pay for animal welfare in dairy production: application of nonhypothetical valuation mechanisms.信息对乳品生产中动物福利支付意愿的影响:非假设性评估机制的应用。
J Dairy Sci. 2012 Mar;95(3):1099-107. doi: 10.3168/jds.2011-4730.