• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

腹腔镜手术治疗极低位直肠癌的安全性与可行性:基于单中心经验的回顾性分析

The Safety and Feasibility of Laparoscopic Surgery for Very Low Rectal Cancer: A Retrospective Analysis Based on a Single Center's Experience.

作者信息

Chung Hyuk-Jun, Kim Jun-Gi, Kim Hyung-Jin, Cho Hyeon-Min, Kye Bong-Hyeon

机构信息

Department of Surgery, Mulago National Referral Hospital, Kampala P.O. Box 7051, Uganda.

Department of Surgery, Pyeongtaek St. Mary's Hospital, Pyeongtaek 17825, Korea.

出版信息

Biomedicines. 2021 Nov 19;9(11):1720. doi: 10.3390/biomedicines9111720.

DOI:10.3390/biomedicines9111720
PMID:34829951
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8615789/
Abstract

In this work we intend to validate the long-term oncologic outcomes for very low rectal cancer over the past 20 years and to determine whether laparoscopic procedures are useful options for very low rectal cancer. A total of 327 patients, who electively underwent laparoscopic rectal cancer surgery for a lesion within 5 cm from the anal verge, were enrolled in this study and their long-term outcomes were reviewed retrospectively. Of 327 patients, 70 patients underwent laparoscopic low anterior resection (LAR), 164 underwent laparoscopic abdominal transanal proctosigmoidocolectomy with coloanal anastomosis (LATA), and 93 underwent laparoscopic abdominoperineal resection (APR). The conversion rate was 1.22% (4/327). The overall postoperative morbidity rate was 26.30% (86/327). The 5-year disease free survival (DFS), 5-year overall survival (OS), and 3-year local recurrence (LR) were 64.3%, 79.7%, and 9.2%, respectively. The CRM involvement was a significant independent factor for DFS ( = 0.018) and OS ( = 0.042) in multivariate analysis. Laparoscopic APR showed poorer 5-year DFS (47.8%), 5-year OS (64.0%), and 3-year LR (17.6%) than laparoscopic LAR (74.1%, 86.4%, 1.9%) and laparoscopic LATA (69.2%, 83.6%, 9.2%). Laparoscopic procedures for very low rectal cancer including LAR, LATA, and APR could be good surgical options in selective patients with very low rectal cancer.

摘要

在本研究中,我们旨在验证过去20年中极低位置直肠癌的长期肿瘤学结局,并确定腹腔镜手术是否是极低位置直肠癌的有效治疗选择。本研究共纳入327例因距肛缘5 cm以内病变而择期接受腹腔镜直肠癌手术的患者,并对其长期结局进行回顾性分析。327例患者中,70例行腹腔镜低位前切除术(LAR),164例行腹腔镜经腹经肛门直肠乙状结肠切除术并结肠肛管吻合术(LATA),93例行腹腔镜腹会阴联合切除术(APR)。中转率为1.22%(4/327)。术后总体并发症发生率为26.30%(86/327)。5年无病生存率(DFS)、5年总生存率(OS)和3年局部复发率(LR)分别为64.3%、79.7%和9.2%。多因素分析显示,环周切缘受累是DFS(P = 0.018)和OS(P = 0.042)的显著独立因素。腹腔镜APR的5年DFS(47.8%)、5年OS(64.0%)和3年LR(17.6%)均低于腹腔镜LAR(74.1%、86.4%、1.9%)和腹腔镜LATA(69.2%、83.6%、9.2%)。对于极低位置直肠癌患者,包括LAR、LATA和APR在内的腹腔镜手术可能是较好的手术选择。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c223/8615789/61aa9c0f28e8/biomedicines-09-01720-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c223/8615789/86bb904fadf2/biomedicines-09-01720-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c223/8615789/fd8804656cf1/biomedicines-09-01720-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c223/8615789/61aa9c0f28e8/biomedicines-09-01720-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c223/8615789/86bb904fadf2/biomedicines-09-01720-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c223/8615789/fd8804656cf1/biomedicines-09-01720-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c223/8615789/61aa9c0f28e8/biomedicines-09-01720-g003.jpg

相似文献

1
The Safety and Feasibility of Laparoscopic Surgery for Very Low Rectal Cancer: A Retrospective Analysis Based on a Single Center's Experience.腹腔镜手术治疗极低位直肠癌的安全性与可行性:基于单中心经验的回顾性分析
Biomedicines. 2021 Nov 19;9(11):1720. doi: 10.3390/biomedicines9111720.
2
Laparoscopic Abdominal Transanal Proctocolectomy with Coloanal Anastomosis Is a Good Surgical Option in Selective Patients with Low-Lying Rectal Cancer: A Retrospective Analysis Based on a Single Surgeon's Experience.腹腔镜经腹经肛门直肠结肠切除术加结肠肛管吻合术是低位直肠癌选择性患者的一种良好手术选择:基于单一外科医生经验的回顾性分析
J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A. 2018 Mar;28(3):269-277. doi: 10.1089/lap.2017.0226. Epub 2017 Dec 12.
3
Sphincter preservation in low rectal cancer is facilitated by preoperative chemoradiation and intersphincteric dissection.术前放化疗及括约肌间分离有助于低位直肠癌保肛。
Ann Surg. 2009 Feb;249(2):236-42. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0b013e318195e17c.
4
[Effects of tumor distance from anal verge and types of operations on survival outcomes for low rectal cancer after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy].[肿瘤距肛缘距离及手术方式对新辅助放化疗后低位直肠癌生存结局的影响]
Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi. 2014 Jun 10;94(22):1705-9.
5
Abdominoperineal resection and low anterior resection: comparison of long-term oncologic outcome in matched patients with lower rectal cancer.腹会阴联合切除术与低位前切除术治疗低位直肠癌患者的长期肿瘤学结局比较。
Int J Colorectal Dis. 2013 Apr;28(4):493-501. doi: 10.1007/s00384-012-1590-8. Epub 2012 Oct 2.
6
Changing operative strategy from abdominoperineal resection to sphincter preservation in T3 low rectal cancer after downstaging by neoadjuvant chemoradiation: a preliminary report.新辅助放化疗使T3期低位直肠癌降期后,手术策略从腹会阴联合切除术转变为保留括约肌:初步报告
World J Surg. 2015 May;39(5):1248-56. doi: 10.1007/s00268-014-2930-3.
7
Sphincter-sparing surgery for adenocarcinoma of the distal 3 cm of the true rectum: results after neoadjuvant therapy and minimally invasive radical surgery or local excision.保留肛门括约肌的手术治疗直肠下段 3cm 内的腺癌:新辅助治疗后微创根治性手术或局部切除的结果。
Surg Endosc. 2013 Dec;27(12):4469-77. doi: 10.1007/s00464-013-3092-3. Epub 2013 Sep 21.
8
Risk factors for adverse outcome in patients with rectal cancer treated with an abdominoperineal resection in the total mesorectal excision trial.全直肠系膜切除试验中接受腹会阴联合切除术治疗的直肠癌患者不良结局的危险因素。
Ann Surg. 2007 Jul;246(1):83-90. doi: 10.1097/01.sla.0000259432.29056.9d.
9
Laparoscopic versus open techniques in rectal cancer surgery: a retrospective analysis of 121 sphincter-saving procedures in a single institution.腹腔镜与开放技术在直肠癌手术中的应用:单中心 121 例保肛手术的回顾性分析。
Surg Endosc. 2011 Feb;25(2):454-62. doi: 10.1007/s00464-010-1191-y. Epub 2010 Jul 7.
10
Coloanal anastomosis for distal third rectal cancer: prospective study of oncologic results.远端三分之一直肠癌的结肠肛管吻合术:肿瘤学结果的前瞻性研究
Dis Colon Rectum. 1999 Oct;42(10):1272-5. doi: 10.1007/BF02234212.

本文引用的文献

1
Local Recurrence and Disease-Free Survival After Transanal Total Mesorectal Excision: Results From the International TaTME Registry.经肛门全直肠系膜切除术后的局部复发和无病生存期:国际经肛门全直肠系膜切除术登记处的结果
J Natl Compr Canc Netw. 2021 Aug 17;19(11):1232-1240. doi: 10.6004/jnccn.2021.7012.
2
Open versus laparoscopic surgery for mid or low rectal cancer after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (COREAN trial): 10-year follow-up of an open-label, non-inferiority, randomised controlled trial.新辅助放化疗后中低位直肠癌的开腹与腹腔镜手术比较(COREAN 试验):一项开放标签、非劣效性、随机对照试验的 10 年随访。
Lancet Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2021 Jul;6(7):569-577. doi: 10.1016/S2468-1253(21)00094-7. Epub 2021 Apr 23.
3
Robot Surgery Shows Similar Long-term Oncologic Outcomes as Laparoscopic Surgery for Mid/Lower Rectal Cancer but Is Beneficial to ypT3/4 After Preoperative Chemoradiation.
机器人手术与腹腔镜手术治疗中/低位直肠癌的长期肿瘤学结果相似,但对术前放化疗后的 ypT3/4 有益。
Dis Colon Rectum. 2021 Jul 1;64(7):812-821. doi: 10.1097/DCR.0000000000001978.
4
Association of Surgical Skill Assessment With Clinical Outcomes in Cancer Surgery.手术技能评估与癌症手术临床结果的关联。
JAMA Surg. 2020 Jul 1;155(7):590-598. doi: 10.1001/jamasurg.2020.1004.
5
Retrospective study of the functional and oncological outcomes of conformal sphincter preservation operation in the treatment of very low rectal cancer.保肛手术治疗超低位直肠癌的功能和肿瘤学结局的回顾性研究。
Tech Coloproctol. 2020 Oct;24(10):1025-1034. doi: 10.1007/s10151-020-02229-2. Epub 2020 May 2.
6
Reconsideration of the Safety of Laparoscopic Rectal Surgery for Cancer.重新审视腹腔镜直肠癌手术的安全性
Ann Coloproctol. 2019 Oct;35(5):229-237. doi: 10.3393/ac.2019.10.16. Epub 2019 Oct 31.
7
Oncologic outcomes for low rectal adenocarcinoma following low anterior resection with coloanal anastomosis versus abdominoperineal resection: a National Cancer Database propensity matched analysis.低位直肠癌行结肠肛管吻合低位前切除术与腹会阴联合切除术的肿瘤学结局:一项国家癌症数据库倾向评分匹配分析
Int J Colorectal Dis. 2019 May;34(5):843-848. doi: 10.1007/s00384-019-03267-5. Epub 2019 Feb 21.
8
Frequency of Misinterpretation of Inconclusive Noninferiority Trials: The Case of the Laparoscopic vs Open Resection for Rectal Cancer Trials.非劣效临床试验解读错误的频率:以腹腔镜与开腹直肠肿瘤切除术的随机对照临床试验为例。
JAMA Surg. 2019 Jan 1;154(1):90-92. doi: 10.1001/jamasurg.2018.3222.
9
Disease-free Survival and Local Recurrence After Laparoscopic-assisted Resection or Open Resection for Rectal Cancer: The Australasian Laparoscopic Cancer of the Rectum Randomized Clinical Trial.腹腔镜辅助与开放直肠癌根治术后无病生存和局部复发:澳大利亚腹腔镜直肠癌随机临床试验。
Ann Surg. 2019 Apr;269(4):596-602. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000003021.
10
Disease-free Survival and Local Recurrence for Laparoscopic Resection Compared With Open Resection of Stage II to III Rectal Cancer: Follow-up Results of the ACOSOG Z6051 Randomized Controlled Trial.腹腔镜与开腹手术治疗 II 期至 III 期直肠癌的无病生存和局部复发比较:ACOSOG Z6051 随机对照试验的随访结果。
Ann Surg. 2019 Apr;269(4):589-595. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000003002.