• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

远程皮肤癌诊断:在电子转诊中添加图像比等待护士主导的影像诊所安排更有效。

Remote Skin Cancer Diagnosis: Adding Images to Electronic Referrals Is More Efficient Than Wait-Listing for a Nurse-Led Imaging Clinic.

作者信息

Jones Leah, Jameson Michael, Oakley Amanda

机构信息

Waikato District Health Board, Hamilton 3204, New Zealand.

Waikato Clinical Campus, University of Auckland, Hamilton 3204, New Zealand.

出版信息

Cancers (Basel). 2021 Nov 20;13(22):5828. doi: 10.3390/cancers13225828.

DOI:10.3390/cancers13225828
PMID:34830982
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8616500/
Abstract

We undertook a retrospective comparison of two teledermatology pathways that provide diagnostic and management advice for suspected skin cancers, to evaluate the time from referral to diagnosis and its concordance with histology. Primary Care doctors could refer patients to either the Virtual Lesion Clinic (VLC), a nurse-led community teledermoscopy clinic or, more recently, to the Suspected Skin Cancer (SSC) pathway, which requires them to attach regional, close-up, and dermoscopic images. The primary objective of this study was to determine the comparative time course between the SSC pathway and VLC. Secondary objectives included comparative diagnostic concordance, skin lesion classification, and evaluation of missed skin lesions during subsequent follow-up. VLC referrals from July to December 2016 and 2020 were compared to SSC referrals from July to December 2020. 408 patients with 682 lesions in the VLC cohort were compared with 480 patients with 548 lesions from the 2020 SSC cohort, matched for age, sex, and ethnicity, including histology where available. Median time (SD) from referral to receipt of teledermatology advice was four (2.8) days and 50 (43.0) days for the SSC and VLC cohorts, respectively ( < 0.001). Diagnostic concordance between teledermatologist and histopathologist for benign versus malignant lesions was 70% for 114 lesions in the SSC cohort, comparable to the VLC cohort (71% of 122 lesions). Referrals from primary care, where skin lesions were imaged with variable devices and quality resulted in faster specialist advice with similar diagnostic performance compared to high-quality imaging at nurse-led specialist dermoscopy clinics.

摘要

我们对两条为疑似皮肤癌提供诊断和管理建议的远程皮肤病学途径进行了回顾性比较,以评估从转诊到诊断的时间及其与组织学的一致性。初级保健医生可以将患者转诊至虚拟病变诊所(VLC),这是一个由护士主导的社区皮肤镜检查诊所,或者,最近可以转诊至疑似皮肤癌(SSC)途径,该途径要求他们附上局部、特写和皮肤镜图像。本研究的主要目的是确定SSC途径和VLC之间的比较时间进程。次要目标包括比较诊断一致性、皮肤病变分类,以及评估后续随访期间漏诊的皮肤病变。将2016年7月至12月和2020年的VLC转诊病例与2020年7月至12月的SSC转诊病例进行比较。VLC队列中的408例患者有682处病变,与2020年SSC队列中的480例患者有548处病变进行比较,根据年龄、性别和种族进行匹配,包括在可获得组织学结果的情况下进行匹配。SSC和VLC队列从转诊到收到远程皮肤病学建议的中位时间(标准差)分别为4(2.8)天和50(43.0)天(<0.001)。SSC队列中114处病变的远程皮肤科医生与组织病理学家之间对良性与恶性病变的诊断一致性为70%,与VLC队列相当(122处病变中的71%)。与护士主导的专科皮肤镜检查诊所的高质量成像相比,初级保健机构的转诊病例中,使用不同设备和质量成像的皮肤病变能更快获得专科建议,且诊断性能相似。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cac3/8616500/c11fcadb6464/cancers-13-05828-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cac3/8616500/f0a482361b6f/cancers-13-05828-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cac3/8616500/ceca120ab87c/cancers-13-05828-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cac3/8616500/c11fcadb6464/cancers-13-05828-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cac3/8616500/f0a482361b6f/cancers-13-05828-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cac3/8616500/ceca120ab87c/cancers-13-05828-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cac3/8616500/c11fcadb6464/cancers-13-05828-g003.jpg

相似文献

1
Remote Skin Cancer Diagnosis: Adding Images to Electronic Referrals Is More Efficient Than Wait-Listing for a Nurse-Led Imaging Clinic.远程皮肤癌诊断:在电子转诊中添加图像比等待护士主导的影像诊所安排更有效。
Cancers (Basel). 2021 Nov 20;13(22):5828. doi: 10.3390/cancers13225828.
2
Successful melanoma triage by a virtual lesion clinic (teledermatoscopy).通过虚拟病变诊所(远程皮肤镜检查)成功进行黑色素瘤分诊
J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol. 2015 Dec;29(12):2423-8. doi: 10.1111/jdv.13309. Epub 2015 Sep 15.
3
Virtual lesion clinic - Evaluation of a teledermatology triage system for referrals for suspected melanoma.虚拟病灶诊所 - 评估一种远程皮肤病学分诊系统,以对疑似黑色素瘤的转诊进行评估。
Australas J Dermatol. 2022 Feb;63(1):e33-e40. doi: 10.1111/ajd.13777. Epub 2021 Dec 27.
4
Teledermatology for Enhancing Skin Cancer Diagnosis and Management: Retrospective Chart Review.用于加强皮肤癌诊断与管理的远程皮肤病学:回顾性病历审查
JMIR Dermatol. 2023 May 29;6:e45430. doi: 10.2196/45430.
5
Diagnostic agreement and interobserver concordance with teledermoscopy referrals.远程皮肤镜转诊的诊断一致性和观察者间一致性。
J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol. 2017 May;31(5):898-903. doi: 10.1111/jdv.14147. Epub 2017 Mar 6.
6
Telemedicine in dermatology: a randomised controlled trial.皮肤科远程医疗:一项随机对照试验。
Health Technol Assess. 2006 Nov;10(43):iii-iv, ix-xi, 1-39. doi: 10.3310/hta10430.
7
To Refer or Not to Refer in Teledermoscopy: Retrospective Study.远程皮肤镜检查中的转诊与否:回顾性研究
JMIR Dermatol. 2022 Sep 23;5(3):e40888. doi: 10.2196/40888.
8
The Use of Teledermatology for Skin Cancer Referrals: A Retrospective Study in a Single Tertiary Centre.远程皮肤病学在皮肤癌转诊中的应用:一项在单一三级中心的回顾性研究。
Cureus. 2024 Aug 31;16(8):e68284. doi: 10.7759/cureus.68284. eCollection 2024 Aug.
9
Better, sooner, more convenient: a successful teledermoscopy service.更好、更快、更便捷:成功的远程皮肤镜服务。
Australas J Dermatol. 2012 Feb;53(1):22-5. doi: 10.1111/j.1440-0960.2011.00836.x. Epub 2011 Dec 29.
10
Revolutionizing Skin Cancer Triage: The Role of Patient-Initiated Teledermoscopy in Remote Diagnosis.革新皮肤癌分诊:患者自主式远程皮肤镜检查在远程诊断中的作用
Cancers (Basel). 2024 Jul 17;16(14):2565. doi: 10.3390/cancers16142565.

引用本文的文献

1
A qualitative exploration of the pathway to diagnosis and treatment of cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck with perineural spread.头颈部伴神经周围浸润的皮肤鳞状细胞癌诊断和治疗途径的定性探索。
Cancer Med. 2024 Aug;13(16):e70118. doi: 10.1002/cam4.70118.
2
General Practitioners' Perspectives About Remote Dermatology Care During the COVID-19 Pandemic in the Netherlands: Questionnaire-Based Study.荷兰全科医生对新冠疫情期间远程皮肤病护理的看法:基于问卷调查的研究
JMIR Dermatol. 2023 Jun 13;6:e46682. doi: 10.2196/46682.
3
Diagnostic reliability in teledermatology: a systematic review and a meta-analysis.

本文引用的文献

1
Pandemic Pressure: Teledermatology and Health Care Disparities.大流行压力:远程皮肤病学与医疗保健差距
J Patient Exp. 2021 Feb 23;8:2374373521996982. doi: 10.1177/2374373521996982. eCollection 2021.
2
Teledermatology Addressing Disparities in Health Care Access: a Review.远程皮肤病学:解决医疗保健可及性方面的差异——综述
Curr Dermatol Rep. 2021;10(2):40-47. doi: 10.1007/s13671-021-00329-2. Epub 2021 Mar 12.
3
The incidence and clinical analysis of non-melanoma skin cancer.非黑色素瘤皮肤癌的发病情况与临床分析。
远程皮肤病学的诊断可靠性:系统评价和荟萃分析。
BMJ Open. 2023 Aug 11;13(8):e068207. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-068207.
4
Analysis of Teledermoscopy and Face-to-Face Examination of Atypical Pigmented Lesions: a Cross-Sectional, Retrospective Study.非典型色素性皮损的远程皮肤镜检查与面对面检查分析:一项横断面回顾性研究。
Dermatol Pract Concept. 2023 Jul 1;13(3):e2023212. doi: 10.5826/dpc.1303a212.
Sci Rep. 2021 Feb 22;11(1):4337. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-83502-8.
4
Teledermatology in the times of COVID-19 - a systematic review.COVID-19 时代的远程皮肤病学 - 系统评价。
J Dtsch Dermatol Ges. 2020 Aug;18(8):841-845. doi: 10.1111/ddg.14180. Epub 2020 Jul 27.
5
Accuracy of mobile digital teledermoscopy for skin self-examinations in adults at high risk of skin cancer: an open-label, randomised controlled trial.移动数字远程皮肤镜检查在皮肤癌高危成年人皮肤自我检查中的准确性:一项开放标签、随机对照试验。
Lancet Digit Health. 2020 Mar;2(3):e129-e137. doi: 10.1016/S2589-7500(20)30001-7. Epub 2020 Feb 20.
6
Overdiagnosis of melanoma - causes, consequences and solutions.过度诊断黑色素瘤 - 原因、后果与解决方案。
J Dtsch Dermatol Ges. 2020 Nov;18(11):1236-1243. doi: 10.1111/ddg.14233. Epub 2020 Aug 25.
7
Development of Multiple-Lesion Basal Cell Carcinoma of the Skin: A Comprehensive Review.皮肤多发性基底细胞癌的发展:全面综述
Sisli Etfal Hastan Tip Bul. 2019 Nov 19;53(4):323-328. doi: 10.14744/SEMB.2019.08058. eCollection 2019.
8
E-referrals and teledermatoscopy grading for melanoma: a successful model of care.电子转诊和远程皮肤镜检查分级用于黑色素瘤:一种成功的护理模式。
Australas J Dermatol. 2020 May;61(2):147-151. doi: 10.1111/ajd.13230. Epub 2020 Feb 16.
9
Evaluation of the Number-Needed-to-Biopsy Metric for the Diagnosis of Cutaneous Melanoma: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.用于皮肤黑色素瘤诊断的活检所需数量指标评估:一项系统评价与荟萃分析
JAMA Dermatol. 2019 Oct 1;155(10):1167-1174. doi: 10.1001/jamadermatol.2019.1514.
10
Use of Teledermatology to Improve Dermatological Access in Rural Areas.利用远程皮肤病学改善农村地区的皮肤病诊疗服务
Telemed J E Health. 2019 Nov;25(11):1022-1032. doi: 10.1089/tmj.2018.0130. Epub 2019 Feb 11.