Department of Health Sciences, University of York, York YO10 5DD, UK.
Independent Researcher, Clackmannan FK10 4EF, UK.
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Nov 12;18(22):11908. doi: 10.3390/ijerph182211908.
Research has reported the benefits of companion animals for people with severe mental illness (SMI). However, this evidence base is fragmented and unclear. The COVID-19 pandemic presents an opportunity to explore the role of companion animals in the context of social distancing and isolation measures for people with SMI. Therefore, we aimed to investigate the links between mental and physical health and animal ownership in people with SMI and to explore animal owners' perceptions related to human-animal interactions during the pandemic restrictions. A survey was conducted with a previously assembled cohort of individuals with SMI in the UK. The survey included previously validated and new bespoke items measuring demographics, and outcomes related to mental and physical health, and human-animal interactions. The survey also included a question inviting free-text responses, allowing participants to describe any experiences of their human-animal relationships during the pandemic. Of 315 participants who consented to participate, 249 (79%) completed the survey. Of these, 115 (46.2%) had at least one companion animal. Regression analyses indicated that animal ownership was not significantly associated with well-being and loneliness. However, animal ownership was associated with a self-reported decline in mental health ( = 0.640, 95% CI [0.102-1.231], = 0.025), but no self-reported change in physical health. Thematic analysis identified two main themes relating to the positive and negative impact of animal ownership during pandemic restrictions. Animal ownership appeared to be linked to self-reported mental health decline in people with SMI during the second wave of the pandemic in the UK. However, the thematic analysis also highlighted the perceived benefit of animal ownership during this time. Further targeted investigation of the role of human-animal relationships and the perceived human-animal bond for human health is warranted.
研究报告了伴侣动物对严重精神疾病(SMI)患者的益处。然而,这一证据基础是零散和不清楚的。COVID-19 大流行提供了一个机会,可以探索伴侣动物在 SMI 患者社交距离和隔离措施背景下的作用。因此,我们旨在调查 SMI 患者的精神和身体健康与动物拥有之间的联系,并探索动物主人在大流行限制期间对人与动物互动的看法。我们对英国以前组建的 SMI 患者队列进行了一项调查。该调查包括以前验证过的和新的定制项目,用于衡量人口统计学、与精神和身体健康相关的结果以及人与动物的互动。该调查还包括一个邀请自由文本回复的问题,允许参与者描述他们在大流行期间与人类-动物关系的任何经历。在同意参与的 315 名参与者中,有 249 名(79%)完成了调查。其中,有 115 名(46.2%)至少有一只伴侣动物。回归分析表明,动物拥有与幸福感和孤独感没有显著关联。然而,动物拥有与自我报告的心理健康下降有关( = 0.640,95%CI [0.102-1.231], = 0.025),但与自我报告的身体健康变化无关。主题分析确定了与大流行限制期间动物拥有的积极和消极影响相关的两个主要主题。在英国第二波大流行期间,动物拥有似乎与 SMI 患者自我报告的心理健康下降有关。然而,主题分析也强调了在此期间动物拥有的感知益处。进一步有针对性地调查人与动物关系的作用和感知的人与动物纽带对人类健康的影响是必要的。