• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

种内变异性对暴露于旋转磁场的细菌生长速率和细胞代谢活性的影响。

The Impact of Intraspecies Variability on Growth Rate and Cellular Metabolic Activity of Bacteria Exposed to Rotating Magnetic Field.

作者信息

Woroszyło Marta, Ciecholewska-Juśko Daria, Junka Adam, Pruss Agata, Kwiatkowski Paweł, Wardach Marcin, Fijałkowski Karol

机构信息

Department of Microbiology and Biotechnology, Faculty of Biotechnology and Animal Husbandry, West Pomeranian University of Technology in Szczecin, Piastów 45, 70-311 Szczecin, Poland.

Department of Pharmaceutical Microbiology and Parasitology, Faculty of Pharmacy, Medical University of Wroclaw, Borowska 211a, 50-534 Wrocław, Poland.

出版信息

Pathogens. 2021 Nov 4;10(11):1427. doi: 10.3390/pathogens10111427.

DOI:10.3390/pathogens10111427
PMID:34832583
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8624435/
Abstract

Majority of research on the influence of magnetic fields on microorganisms has been carried out with the use of different species or different groups of microorganisms, but not with the use of different strains belonging to one species. The purpose of the present study was to assess the effect of rotating magnetic fields (RMF) of 5 and 50 Hz on the growth and cellular metabolic activity of eight species of bacteria: , , , , , , , and . However, contrary to the research conducted so far, each species was represented by at least four different strains. Moreover, an additional group of belonging to a single clonal type but representing different biotypes was also included in the experiment. The results showed a varied influence of RMF on growth dynamics and cellular metabolic activity, diversified to the greatest extent in dependence on the bacterial strain exposed to the RMF and to a lesser extent in dependence on the frequency of the generated magnetic field. It was found that, with regard to the exposed strain of the same species, the effect exerted by the RMF may be positive (i.e., manifests as the increase in the growth rate or/and cellular metabolic activity) or negative (i.e., manifests as a reduction of both aforementioned features) or none. Even when one clonal type of was used, the results of RMF exposure also varied (although the degree of differentiation was lower than for strains representing different clones). Therefore, the research has proven that, apart from the previously described factors related primarily to the physical parameters of the magnetic field, one of the key parameters affecting the final result of its influence is the bacterial intraspecies variability.

摘要

大多数关于磁场对微生物影响的研究都是使用不同种类或不同组别的微生物进行的,而不是使用属于同一物种的不同菌株。本研究的目的是评估5Hz和50Hz旋转磁场(RMF)对八种细菌的生长和细胞代谢活性的影响,这八种细菌分别是:[此处原文缺失细菌名称]。然而,与迄今为止进行的研究不同,每个物种至少由四种不同的菌株代表。此外,实验中还包括了一组属于单一克隆类型但代表不同生物型的[此处原文缺失细菌名称]。结果表明,RMF对生长动力学和细胞代谢活性的影响各不相同,在很大程度上取决于暴露于RMF的细菌菌株,在较小程度上取决于所产生磁场的频率。研究发现,对于同一物种的暴露菌株,RMF施加的影响可能是积极的(即表现为生长速率或/和细胞代谢活性的增加)或消极的(即表现为上述两种特征的降低)或无影响。即使使用单一克隆类型的[此处原文缺失细菌名称],RMF暴露的结果也有所不同(尽管分化程度低于代表不同克隆的菌株)。因此,该研究证明,除了先前描述的主要与磁场物理参数相关的因素外,影响其影响最终结果的关键参数之一是细菌种内变异性。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/23e8/8624435/085e50728ec0/pathogens-10-01427-g007.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/23e8/8624435/4527b5f68e78/pathogens-10-01427-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/23e8/8624435/ed1e825e9782/pathogens-10-01427-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/23e8/8624435/5f8aae3de067/pathogens-10-01427-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/23e8/8624435/3aeb0872f967/pathogens-10-01427-g004a.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/23e8/8624435/5eac59484d4f/pathogens-10-01427-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/23e8/8624435/629119f868c7/pathogens-10-01427-g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/23e8/8624435/085e50728ec0/pathogens-10-01427-g007.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/23e8/8624435/4527b5f68e78/pathogens-10-01427-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/23e8/8624435/ed1e825e9782/pathogens-10-01427-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/23e8/8624435/5f8aae3de067/pathogens-10-01427-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/23e8/8624435/3aeb0872f967/pathogens-10-01427-g004a.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/23e8/8624435/5eac59484d4f/pathogens-10-01427-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/23e8/8624435/629119f868c7/pathogens-10-01427-g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/23e8/8624435/085e50728ec0/pathogens-10-01427-g007.jpg

相似文献

1
The Impact of Intraspecies Variability on Growth Rate and Cellular Metabolic Activity of Bacteria Exposed to Rotating Magnetic Field.种内变异性对暴露于旋转磁场的细菌生长速率和细胞代谢活性的影响。
Pathogens. 2021 Nov 4;10(11):1427. doi: 10.3390/pathogens10111427.
2
Regulatory and Enterotoxin Gene Expression and Enterotoxins Production in FRI913 Cultures Exposed to a Rotating Magnetic Field and -Anethole.在旋转磁场和茴香脑作用下 FRI913 培养物的调控和肠毒素基因表达及肠毒素产生。
Int J Mol Sci. 2022 Jun 6;23(11):6327. doi: 10.3390/ijms23116327.
3
Effects of rotating magnetic field exposure on the functional parameters of different species of bacteria.旋转磁场暴露对不同种类细菌功能参数的影响。
Electromagn Biol Med. 2015 Mar;34(1):48-55. doi: 10.3109/15368378.2013.869754. Epub 2014 Jan 24.
4
Effects of 50 Hz rotating magnetic field on the viability of Escherichia coli and Staphylococcus aureus.50赫兹旋转磁场对大肠杆菌和金黄色葡萄球菌生存能力的影响
Electromagn Biol Med. 2014 Jan;33(1):29-34. doi: 10.3109/15368378.2013.783848. Epub 2013 May 28.
5
The Effect of Rotating Magnetic Field on Susceptibility Profile of Methicillin-Resistant Strains Exposed to Activity of Different Groups of Antibiotics.旋转磁场对不同抗生素组别作用下的耐甲氧西林金黄色葡萄球菌的药敏谱的影响。
Int J Mol Sci. 2021 Oct 26;22(21):11551. doi: 10.3390/ijms222111551.
6
Modulation of Cellular Response to Different Parameters of the Rotating Magnetic Field (RMF)-An In Vitro Wound Healing Study.旋转磁场(RMF)不同参数对细胞反应的调节-体外伤口愈合研究。
Int J Mol Sci. 2021 May 28;22(11):5785. doi: 10.3390/ijms22115785.
7
The effects of rotating magnetic field and antiseptic on in vitro pathogenic biofilm and its milieu.旋转磁场和防腐剂对体外致病生物膜及其环境的影响。
Sci Rep. 2022 May 25;12(1):8836. doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-12840-y.
8
Application of Magnetically Assisted Reactors for Modulation of Growth and Pyocyanin Production by .磁辅助反应器在调节……生长和绿脓菌素产生中的应用
Front Bioeng Biotechnol. 2022 Mar 9;10:795871. doi: 10.3389/fbioe.2022.795871. eCollection 2022.
9
[Antimicrobial susceptibility and prevalence of beta-lactamase producing clinical isolates in southern Kyushu. The results of collaborative study from 1999 to 2000].[九州南部产β-内酰胺酶临床分离株的抗菌药敏性及流行情况。1999年至2000年合作研究结果]
Jpn J Antibiot. 2002 Sep;55 Suppl A:95-110.
10
Safety of Exposure to 0.2 T and 4 Hz Rotating Magnetic Field: A Ten-Month Study on C57BL/6 Mice.暴露于0.2T和4Hz旋转磁场的安全性:对C57BL/6小鼠的十个月研究
Curr Issues Mol Biol. 2024 Jun 26;46(7):6390-6406. doi: 10.3390/cimb46070382.

引用本文的文献

1
Electromagnetic fields effects on microbial growth in cocoa fermentation: A controlled experimental approach using established growth models.电磁场对可可发酵中微生物生长的影响:一种使用既定生长模型的对照实验方法。
Heliyon. 2024 Jan 21;10(3):e24927. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e24927. eCollection 2024 Feb 15.
2
Comparison of antibiofilm activity of low-concentrated hypochlorites vs polyhexanide-containing antiseptic.低浓度次氯酸盐与含聚六亚甲基胍消毒剂的抗生物膜活性比较。
Front Cell Infect Microbiol. 2023 Mar 15;13:1119188. doi: 10.3389/fcimb.2023.1119188. eCollection 2023.
3
The Assessment of Activity of Antiseptic Agents against Biofilm of Measured with the Use of Processed Microscopic Images.

本文引用的文献

1
Antimicrobial stewardship of antiseptics that are pertinent to wounds: the need for a united approach.与伤口相关的防腐剂的抗菌管理:需要统一的方法。
JAC Antimicrob Resist. 2021 Mar 25;3(1):dlab027. doi: 10.1093/jacamr/dlab027. eCollection 2021 Mar.
2
Short-range quorum sensing controls horizontal gene transfer at micron scale in bacterial communities.短程群体感应控制细菌群落中微米尺度的水平基因转移。
Nat Commun. 2021 Apr 19;12(1):2324. doi: 10.1038/s41467-021-22649-4.
3
Modulation of quorum sensing-associated virulence in bacteria: carbohydrate as a key factor.
利用处理后的显微镜图像评估抗微生物剂对生物膜活性的作用。
Int J Mol Sci. 2022 Nov 4;23(21):13524. doi: 10.3390/ijms232113524.
4
Regulatory and Enterotoxin Gene Expression and Enterotoxins Production in FRI913 Cultures Exposed to a Rotating Magnetic Field and -Anethole.在旋转磁场和茴香脑作用下 FRI913 培养物的调控和肠毒素基因表达及肠毒素产生。
Int J Mol Sci. 2022 Jun 6;23(11):6327. doi: 10.3390/ijms23116327.
5
The effects of rotating magnetic field and antiseptic on in vitro pathogenic biofilm and its milieu.旋转磁场和防腐剂对体外致病生物膜及其环境的影响。
Sci Rep. 2022 May 25;12(1):8836. doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-12840-y.
细菌群体感应相关毒力的调控:碳水化合物作为关键因素。
Arch Microbiol. 2021 Jul;203(5):1881-1890. doi: 10.1007/s00203-021-02235-4. Epub 2021 Feb 28.
4
The importance of in vivo biofilm models for clinical practice.体内生物膜模型在临床实践中的重要性。
Wound Repair Regen. 2020 Jul;28(4):578-579. doi: 10.1111/wrr.12819. Epub 2020 May 20.
5
Investigation on Antibiotic-Resistance, Biofilm Formation and Virulence Factors in Multi Drug Resistant and Non Multi Drug Resistant .多重耐药和非多重耐药细菌的抗生素耐药性、生物膜形成及毒力因子研究
Microorganisms. 2019 Dec 16;7(12):702. doi: 10.3390/microorganisms7120702.
6
Growth Pattern of Magnetic Field-Treated Bacteria.磁场处理细菌的生长模式。
Curr Microbiol. 2020 Feb;77(2):194-203. doi: 10.1007/s00284-019-01820-7. Epub 2019 Nov 27.
7
Metabolic Remodeling during Biofilm Development of Bacillus subtilis.枯草芽孢杆菌生物膜发育过程中的代谢重塑。
mBio. 2019 May 21;10(3):e00623-19. doi: 10.1128/mBio.00623-19.
8
Variability of Bacterial Essential Genes Among Closely Related Bacteria: The Case of .密切相关细菌中细菌必需基因的变异性:以……为例
Front Microbiol. 2018 May 29;9:1059. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2018.01059. eCollection 2018.
9
Options and Limitations in Clinical Investigation of Bacterial Biofilms.细菌生物膜临床研究中的选择与局限。
Clin Microbiol Rev. 2018 Apr 4;31(3). doi: 10.1128/CMR.00084-16. Print 2018 Jul.
10
Behavioral Variability and Phenotypic Diversity in Bacterial Chemotaxis.细菌趋性行为的可变性和表型多样性。
Annu Rev Biophys. 2018 May 20;47:595-616. doi: 10.1146/annurev-biophys-062215-010954. Epub 2018 Apr 4.