Suppr超能文献

住院患者腰椎、胸椎和骨盆环脆性骨折的临床转归:通过认证前后数据的比较,评估德国创伤外科学会老年创伤中心的资质。

In-Hospital Clinical Outcomes in Patients with Fragility Fractures of the Lumbar Spine, Thoracic Spine, and Pelvic Ring: A Comparison of Data before and after Certification as a DGU Geriatric Trauma Centre.

机构信息

Department of Orthopaedics, Trauma and Reconstructive Surgery, RWTH Aachen University Hospital, 52074 Aachen, Germany.

Department of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery, Lucerne Cantonal Hospital, 6004 Lucerne, Switzerland.

出版信息

Medicina (Kaunas). 2021 Nov 3;57(11):1197. doi: 10.3390/medicina57111197.

Abstract

: The implementation of orthogeriatric co-management (OGCM) reflects the demand for interdisciplinary collaborations due to the increasing comorbidities of geriatric trauma patients. This study aimed to assess clinical in-hospital outcomes in lumbar spine, thoracic spine, and pelvic ring fragility fracture patients before and after the implementation of a Geriatric Trauma Centre (GTC) certified by the German Trauma Society (DGU). : In this observational, retrospective cohort study, geriatric trauma patients (>70 years of age) were stratified into either a pre-GTC group (hospital admission between 1 January 2012 and 31 December 2013) or a post-GTC group (hospital admission between 1 January 2017 and 31 December 2018). Patients' pre-injury medical complexity was measured by ASA class (American Society of Anaesthesiologists classification), the use of anticoagulant medication, and the ACCI (Age-adjusted Charlson Comorbidity Index). Outcome parameters were patients' in-hospital length of stay (LOS) and mortality rates, as well as new in-hospital findings and diagnoses. Further, the necessity of deviation from initial management plans due to complications was assessed using the Adapted Clavien-Dindo Scoring System in Trauma (ACDiT score of ≥1). : Patients in the post-GTC group ( = 111) were older (median age 82.0 years) compared to the pre-GTC group ( = 108, median age 80.0 years, = 0.016). No differences were found in sex, body mass index, ASA class, or ACCI (all > 0.05). Patients in the post-GTC group used vitamin K antagonists or direct oral anticoagulants more frequently (21.3% versus 10.8%). The incidence of non-surgical treatment and mortality was comparable between groups, while LOS tended to be shorter in the post-GTC group (7.0 days versus 9.0 days, = 0.076). In the post-GTC group, the detection of urinary tract infections (UTI) increased (35.2% versus 16.2%, = 0.001), and the delirium diagnoses tended to increase (13.0% versus 6.3%, = 0.094), while an ACDiT score of ≥1 was comparable between groups ( = 0.169). : In this study including lumbar spine, thoracic spine, and pelvic ring geriatric fragility fractures, patients in the post-GTC group were more medically complex. More UTIs and the tendency for increased delirium detection was observed in the post-GTC group, likely due to improved diagnostic testing. Nonetheless, the necessity of deviation from initial management plans (ACDiT score of ≥1) was comparable between groups, potentially a positive result of OGCM.

摘要

老年创伤患者合并症增多,促使多学科协作实施骨科老年病学联合管理。本研究旨在评估德国创伤学会(DGU)认证的老年创伤中心(GTC)实施前后,腰椎、胸椎和骨盆环脆性骨折患者的院内临床预后。

本回顾性队列研究中,根据年龄将老年创伤患者(>70 岁)分为 GTC 前组(2012 年 1 月 1 日至 2013 年 12 月 31 日入院)和 GTC 后组(2017 年 1 月 1 日至 2018 年 12 月 31 日入院)。患者受伤前的医疗复杂程度通过美国麻醉医师协会(ASA)分级、抗凝药物使用情况和年龄调整 Charlson 合并症指数(ACCI)进行评估。结果参数为患者的院内住院时间(LOS)和死亡率,以及新的院内发现和诊断。此外,还使用改良 Clavien-Dindo 创伤评分系统(ACDiT 评分≥1)评估了由于并发症需要偏离初始治疗计划的必要性。

与 GTC 前组(n=108,中位年龄 80.0 岁)相比,GTC 后组(n=111,中位年龄 82.0 岁)患者年龄更大( = 0.016)。两组患者在性别、体重指数、ASA 分级或 ACCI 方面无差异(均 >0.05)。GTC 后组患者更常使用维生素 K 拮抗剂或直接口服抗凝剂(21.3% vs. 10.8%)。两组非手术治疗和死亡率相当,而 GTC 后组 LOS 更短(7.0 天 vs. 9.0 天, = 0.076)。GTC 后组尿路感染(UTI)检出率增加(35.2% vs. 16.2%, = 0.001),谵妄诊断也有增加趋势(13.0% vs. 6.3%, = 0.094),但两组 ACDiT 评分≥1 无差异( = 0.169)。

本研究纳入了腰椎、胸椎和骨盆环老年脆性骨折患者,与 GTC 前组相比,GTC 后组患者的医疗复杂性更高。GTC 后组 UTI 检出率和谵妄检出率增加,可能是由于诊断检测水平提高所致。尽管如此,两组偏离初始治疗计划的必要性(ACDiT 评分≥1)相当,这可能是骨科老年病学联合管理的积极结果。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/08df/8617676/81779267466b/medicina-57-01197-g001.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验