Department of Orthopaedics, Trauma and Reconstructive Surgery, RWTH Aachen University Hospital, 52074 Aachen, Germany.
Department of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery, Lucerne Cantonal Hospital, 6004 Lucerne, Switzerland.
Medicina (Kaunas). 2021 Nov 3;57(11):1197. doi: 10.3390/medicina57111197.
: The implementation of orthogeriatric co-management (OGCM) reflects the demand for interdisciplinary collaborations due to the increasing comorbidities of geriatric trauma patients. This study aimed to assess clinical in-hospital outcomes in lumbar spine, thoracic spine, and pelvic ring fragility fracture patients before and after the implementation of a Geriatric Trauma Centre (GTC) certified by the German Trauma Society (DGU). : In this observational, retrospective cohort study, geriatric trauma patients (>70 years of age) were stratified into either a pre-GTC group (hospital admission between 1 January 2012 and 31 December 2013) or a post-GTC group (hospital admission between 1 January 2017 and 31 December 2018). Patients' pre-injury medical complexity was measured by ASA class (American Society of Anaesthesiologists classification), the use of anticoagulant medication, and the ACCI (Age-adjusted Charlson Comorbidity Index). Outcome parameters were patients' in-hospital length of stay (LOS) and mortality rates, as well as new in-hospital findings and diagnoses. Further, the necessity of deviation from initial management plans due to complications was assessed using the Adapted Clavien-Dindo Scoring System in Trauma (ACDiT score of ≥1). : Patients in the post-GTC group ( = 111) were older (median age 82.0 years) compared to the pre-GTC group ( = 108, median age 80.0 years, = 0.016). No differences were found in sex, body mass index, ASA class, or ACCI (all > 0.05). Patients in the post-GTC group used vitamin K antagonists or direct oral anticoagulants more frequently (21.3% versus 10.8%). The incidence of non-surgical treatment and mortality was comparable between groups, while LOS tended to be shorter in the post-GTC group (7.0 days versus 9.0 days, = 0.076). In the post-GTC group, the detection of urinary tract infections (UTI) increased (35.2% versus 16.2%, = 0.001), and the delirium diagnoses tended to increase (13.0% versus 6.3%, = 0.094), while an ACDiT score of ≥1 was comparable between groups ( = 0.169). : In this study including lumbar spine, thoracic spine, and pelvic ring geriatric fragility fractures, patients in the post-GTC group were more medically complex. More UTIs and the tendency for increased delirium detection was observed in the post-GTC group, likely due to improved diagnostic testing. Nonetheless, the necessity of deviation from initial management plans (ACDiT score of ≥1) was comparable between groups, potentially a positive result of OGCM.
老年创伤患者合并症增多,促使多学科协作实施骨科老年病学联合管理。本研究旨在评估德国创伤学会(DGU)认证的老年创伤中心(GTC)实施前后,腰椎、胸椎和骨盆环脆性骨折患者的院内临床预后。
本回顾性队列研究中,根据年龄将老年创伤患者(>70 岁)分为 GTC 前组(2012 年 1 月 1 日至 2013 年 12 月 31 日入院)和 GTC 后组(2017 年 1 月 1 日至 2018 年 12 月 31 日入院)。患者受伤前的医疗复杂程度通过美国麻醉医师协会(ASA)分级、抗凝药物使用情况和年龄调整 Charlson 合并症指数(ACCI)进行评估。结果参数为患者的院内住院时间(LOS)和死亡率,以及新的院内发现和诊断。此外,还使用改良 Clavien-Dindo 创伤评分系统(ACDiT 评分≥1)评估了由于并发症需要偏离初始治疗计划的必要性。
与 GTC 前组(n=108,中位年龄 80.0 岁)相比,GTC 后组(n=111,中位年龄 82.0 岁)患者年龄更大( = 0.016)。两组患者在性别、体重指数、ASA 分级或 ACCI 方面无差异(均 >0.05)。GTC 后组患者更常使用维生素 K 拮抗剂或直接口服抗凝剂(21.3% vs. 10.8%)。两组非手术治疗和死亡率相当,而 GTC 后组 LOS 更短(7.0 天 vs. 9.0 天, = 0.076)。GTC 后组尿路感染(UTI)检出率增加(35.2% vs. 16.2%, = 0.001),谵妄诊断也有增加趋势(13.0% vs. 6.3%, = 0.094),但两组 ACDiT 评分≥1 无差异( = 0.169)。
本研究纳入了腰椎、胸椎和骨盆环老年脆性骨折患者,与 GTC 前组相比,GTC 后组患者的医疗复杂性更高。GTC 后组 UTI 检出率和谵妄检出率增加,可能是由于诊断检测水平提高所致。尽管如此,两组偏离初始治疗计划的必要性(ACDiT 评分≥1)相当,这可能是骨科老年病学联合管理的积极结果。