Department of Health Economics and Health Services Research, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Martinistr. 52, 20246, Hamburg, Germany.
Institute of Epidemiology and Medical Biometry, Ulm University, Ulm, Germany.
Osteoporos Int. 2024 Jan;35(1):81-91. doi: 10.1007/s00198-023-06965-7. Epub 2023 Nov 9.
Orthogeriatric co-management (OGCM) may provide benefits for geriatric fragility fracture patients in terms of more frequent osteoporosis treatment and fewer re-fractures. Yet, we did not find higher costs in OGCM hospitals for re-fractures or antiosteoporotic medication for most fracture sites within 12 months, although antiosteoporotic medication was more often prescribed.
Evidence suggests benefits of orthogeriatric co-management (OGCM) for hip fracture patients. Yet, evidence for other fractures is rare. The aim of our study was to conduct an evaluation of economic and health outcomes after the German OGCM for geriatric fragility fracture patients.
This retrospective cohort study was based on German health and long-term care insurance data. Individuals were 80 years and older, sustained a fragility fracture in 2014-2018, and were treated in hospitals certified for OGCM (ATZ group), providing OGCM without certification (OGCM group) or usual care (control group). Healthcare costs from payer perspective, prescribed medications, and re-fractures were investigated within 6 and 12 months. We used weighted gamma and two-part models and applied entropy balancing to account for the lack of randomization. All analyses were stratified per fracture site.
We observed 206,273 patients within 12-month follow-up, of whom 14,100 were treated in ATZ, 133,353 in OGCM, and 58,820 in other hospitals. Total average inpatient costs per patient were significantly higher in the OGCM and particularly ATZ group for all fracture sites, compared to control group. We did not find significant differences in costs for re-fractures or antiosteoporotic medication for most fracture sites, although antiosteoporotic medication was significantly more often observed in the OGCM and particularly ATZ group for hip, pelvic, and humerus fractures.
The observed healthcare costs were higher in ATZ and OGCM hospitals within 12 months. Antiosteoporotic medication was prescribed more often in both groups for most fracture sites, although the corresponding medication costs did not increase.
骨科老年共管理(OGCM)可能会为老年脆弱性骨折患者提供更多的骨质疏松症治疗和减少再骨折的好处。然而,我们没有发现 OGCM 医院在大多数骨折部位的再骨折或抗骨质疏松药物方面的成本更高,尽管更常开抗骨质疏松药物。
有证据表明,骨科老年共管理(OGCM)对髋部骨折患者有好处。然而,关于其他骨折的证据很少。我们研究的目的是评估德国 OGCM 对老年脆弱性骨折患者的经济和健康结果。
这是一项基于德国健康和长期护理保险数据的回顾性队列研究。参与者年龄在 80 岁及以上,2014-2018 年发生脆性骨折,在经 OGCM 认证的医院(ATZ 组)、未经认证的 OGCM 医院(OGCM 组)或常规护理组(对照组)接受治疗。从支付者角度调查了 6 个月和 12 个月的医疗保健费用、处方药物和再骨折情况。我们使用加权伽马和两部分模型,并应用熵平衡来考虑缺乏随机化的情况。所有分析均按骨折部位分层。
在 12 个月的随访中,我们观察到 206273 名患者,其中 14100 名在 ATZ 治疗,133353 名在 OGCM 治疗,58820 名在其他医院治疗。与对照组相比,所有骨折部位的 OGCM 和特别是 ATZ 组的每位患者的平均住院费用均显著更高。我们没有发现大多数骨折部位的再骨折或抗骨质疏松药物成本的显著差异,尽管在髋部、骨盆和肱骨骨折中,OGCM 和特别是 ATZ 组的抗骨质疏松药物更常被开处方。
在 12 个月内,ATZ 和 OGCM 医院的医疗保健费用较高。两组大多数骨折部位的抗骨质疏松药物处方更多,尽管相应的药物费用没有增加。