Henken Espen, König Hans-Helmut, Becker Clemens, Büchele Gisela, Friess Thomas, Jaensch Andrea, Rapp Kilian, Rothenbacher Dietrich, Konnopka Claudia
Department of Health Economics and Health Services Research, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Martinistr. 52, 20246, Hamburg, Germany.
Department of Clinical Gerontology, Robert-Bosch-Hospital, Stuttgart, Germany.
BMC Health Serv Res. 2024 Jul 16;24(1):820. doi: 10.1186/s12913-024-11297-1.
Orthogeriatric co-management (OGCM) describes a collaboration of orthopedic surgeons and geriatricians for the treatment of fragility fractures in geriatric patients. While its cost-effectiveness for hip fractures has been widely investigated, research focusing on fractures of the upper extremities is lacking. Thus, we conducted a health economic evaluation of treatment in OGCM hospitals for forearm and humerus fractures.In a retrospective cohort study with nationwide health insurance claims data, we selected the first inpatient stay due to a forearm or humerus fracture in 2014-2018 either treated in hospitals that were able to offer OGCM (OGCM group) or not (non-OGCM group) and applied a 1-year follow-up. We included 31,557 cases with forearm (63.1% OGCM group) and 39,093 cases with humerus fractures (63.9% OGCM group) and balanced relevant covariates using entropy balancing. We investigated costs in different health sectors, length of stay, and cost-effectiveness regarding total cost per life year or fracture-free life year gained.In both fracture cohorts, initial hospital stay, inpatient stay, and total costs were higher in OGCM than in non-OGCM hospitals. For neither cohort nor effectiveness outcome, the probability that treatment in OGCM hospitals was cost-effective exceeded 95% for a willingness-to-pay of up to €150,000.We did not find distinct benefits of treatment in OGCM hospitals. Assigning cases to study groups on hospital-level and using life years and fracture-free life years, which might not adequately reflect the manifold ways these fractures affect the patients' health, as effectiveness outcomes, might have underestimated the effectiveness of treatment in OGCM hospitals.
骨科老年病联合管理(OGCM)描述了骨科医生和老年病医生合作治疗老年患者脆性骨折的情况。虽然其对髋部骨折的成本效益已得到广泛研究,但针对上肢骨折的研究却很缺乏。因此,我们对OGCM医院治疗前臂和肱骨骨折进行了健康经济评估。
在一项基于全国医疗保险理赔数据的回顾性队列研究中,我们选取了2014 - 2018年因前臂或肱骨骨折首次住院的患者,这些患者分别在能够提供OGCM的医院(OGCM组)或不能提供OGCM的医院(非OGCM组)接受治疗,并进行了1年的随访。我们纳入了31557例前臂骨折患者(OGCM组占63.1%)和39093例肱骨骨折患者(OGCM组占63.9%),并使用熵平衡法平衡相关协变量。我们调查了不同卫生部门的成本、住院时间以及每获得一个生命年或无骨折生命年的总成本的成本效益。
在两个骨折队列中,OGCM医院的初始住院时间、住院总时长和总成本均高于非OGCM医院。对于任何一个队列或有效性结果,当支付意愿高达15万欧元时,OGCM医院治疗具有成本效益的概率均未超过95%。
我们未发现OGCM医院治疗有明显益处。在医院层面将病例分配到研究组,并使用生命年和无骨折生命年作为有效性结果,可能无法充分反映这些骨折影响患者健康的多种方式,这可能低估了OGCM医院治疗的有效性。