• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

一项自然实验比较了“健康之鹰”儿童体重管理干预在学校和社区环境中的效果。

A Natural Experiment Comparing the Effectiveness of the "Healthy Eagles" Child Weight Management Intervention in School Versus Community Settings.

机构信息

Nuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, University of Oxford, Radcliffe Primary Care Building, Radcliffe Observatory Quarter, Woodstock Road, Oxford OX2 6GG, UK.

Nutrition and Dietetics, Foodtalk CIC, London SE16 6SG, UK.

出版信息

Nutrients. 2021 Oct 31;13(11):3912. doi: 10.3390/nu13113912.

DOI:10.3390/nu13113912
PMID:34836167
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8623922/
Abstract

Behavioural weight management interventions are recommended for the treatment of obesity in children. However, the evidence for these is limited and often generated under trial conditions with White, middle-class populations. Healthy Eagles is a behavioural weight management intervention designed to treat excess weight in children. It ran in the London Borough of Croydon from 2017 to 2020 and was delivered in both school and community settings, providing a natural experiment to compare outcomes. A total of 1560 participants started the Healthy Eagles programme; 347 were in the community setting and 703 in the school setting. Data were analysed for those who completed 70% of the programme. In the school setting, there was a small but significant reduction in BMI z-score (M = -0.04, 95% CI = -0.08, -0.01) for participants above a healthy weight, especially in those with severe obesity (M = -0.09, 95% CI = -0.15, -0.03); there was no significant change in any subgroup in the community setting. Linear regression analysis showed the school setting was associated with a 0.26 (95% CI = 0.13, 0.49) greater reduction in BMI z-score than the community setting after adjusting for ethnicity, deprivation, age and gender. Across both programmes, the effect was somewhat greater in participants from a Black (African/Caribbean/Other) ethnic background (M = -0.06, 95% CI = -0.09, -0.02) and from the two most deprived quintiles (M = -0.06, 95% CI = -0.11, -0.01). Data were limited, but minimal changes were measured in nutrition and physical activity behaviours regardless of setting. This evaluation provides indirect evidence of a small but significant benefit to running weight management interventions in a school versus community setting.

摘要

行为体重管理干预措施被推荐用于治疗儿童肥胖。然而,这些证据有限,而且往往是在针对白人和中产阶级人群的试验条件下产生的。健康老鹰(Healthy Eagles)是一种行为体重管理干预措施,旨在治疗儿童超重问题。该干预措施于 2017 年至 2020 年在伦敦克罗伊登区(Croydon)实施,在学校和社区环境中开展,提供了一个自然实验来比较结果。共有 1560 名参与者开始参与健康老鹰计划;347 人在社区环境中,703 人在学校环境中。对完成计划 70%的参与者进行了数据分析。在学校环境中,对于超重的参与者,BMI z 分数有一个较小但显著的降低(M = -0.04,95%置信区间 = -0.08,-0.01),特别是对于严重肥胖的参与者(M = -0.09,95%置信区间 = -0.15,-0.03);在社区环境中,任何亚组都没有显著变化。线性回归分析表明,在校环境中,与社区环境相比,BMI z 分数的降低幅度更大,差值为 0.26(95%置信区间 = 0.13,0.49),在校环境中调整了种族、贫困程度、年龄和性别等因素后,这种差异仍然显著。在两个项目中,来自黑人(非洲/加勒比/其他)背景的参与者(M = -0.06,95%置信区间 = -0.09,-0.02)和来自两个最贫困五分位数的参与者(M = -0.06,95%置信区间 = -0.11,-0.01)的效果稍大。数据有限,但无论在何种环境下,营养和身体活动行为都只有很小的变化。这项评估提供了间接证据,表明在学校环境中开展体重管理干预措施比在社区环境中开展具有较小但显著的益处。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/76d2/8623922/715ea224dcc8/nutrients-13-03912-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/76d2/8623922/715ea224dcc8/nutrients-13-03912-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/76d2/8623922/715ea224dcc8/nutrients-13-03912-g001.jpg

相似文献

1
A Natural Experiment Comparing the Effectiveness of the "Healthy Eagles" Child Weight Management Intervention in School Versus Community Settings.一项自然实验比较了“健康之鹰”儿童体重管理干预在学校和社区环境中的效果。
Nutrients. 2021 Oct 31;13(11):3912. doi: 10.3390/nu13113912.
2
Effects of Lifestyle Modification Interventions to Prevent and Manage Child and Adolescent Obesity: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.生活方式干预对预防和控制儿童和青少年肥胖的效果:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Nutrients. 2020 Jul 24;12(8):2208. doi: 10.3390/nu12082208.
3
Lifestyle intervention for improving school achievement in overweight or obese children and adolescents.改善超重或肥胖儿童及青少年学业成绩的生活方式干预。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014 Mar 14(3):CD009728. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD009728.pub2.
4
Randomised controlled trial evaluating the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of 'Families for Health', a family-based childhood obesity treatment intervention delivered in a community setting for ages 6 to 11 years.一项随机对照试验,评估“健康家庭”项目的有效性和成本效益。该项目是一种针对6至11岁儿童的基于家庭的社区肥胖治疗干预措施。
Health Technol Assess. 2017 Jan;21(1):1-180. doi: 10.3310/hta21010.
5
The West Midlands ActiVe lifestyle and healthy Eating in School children (WAVES) study: a cluster randomised controlled trial testing the clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of a multifaceted obesity prevention intervention programme targeted at children aged 6-7 years.西米德兰兹地区积极生活方式与儿童在校健康饮食研究(WAVES):一项针对 6-7 岁儿童的多方面肥胖预防干预计划的临床有效性和成本效益的集群随机对照试验。
Health Technol Assess. 2018 Feb;22(8):1-608. doi: 10.3310/hta22080.
6
A community-based, multi-level, multi-setting, multi-component intervention to reduce weight gain among low socioeconomic status Latinx children with overweight or obesity: The Stanford GOALS randomised controlled trial.一项基于社区的多层次、多场所、多组分干预措施,旨在减少社会经济地位较低的超重或肥胖拉丁裔儿童的体重增加:斯坦福GOALS随机对照试验。
Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol. 2021 Jun;9(6):336-349. doi: 10.1016/S2213-8587(21)00084-X. Epub 2021 Apr 29.
7
Cultural adaptation of an existing children's weight management programme: the CHANGE intervention and feasibility RCT.现有儿童体重管理项目的文化适应性:CHANGE 干预措施和可行性 RCT。
Health Technol Assess. 2019 Jul;23(33):1-166. doi: 10.3310/hta23330.
8
Tackling obesity in areas of high social deprivation: clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of a task-based weight management group programme - a randomised controlled trial and economic evaluation.解决高度社会贫困地区的肥胖问题:基于任务的体重管理小组计划的临床效果和成本效益——一项随机对照试验和经济评估
Health Technol Assess. 2016 Oct;20(79):1-150. doi: 10.3310/hta20790.
9
Childhood obesity management shifting from health care system to school system: intervention study of school-based weight management programme.儿童肥胖管理正从医疗保健系统转向学校系统:基于学校的体重管理计划的干预研究
BMC Public Health. 2014 Nov 3;14:1128. doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-14-1128.
10
Kids just wanna have fun: Children's experiences of a weight management programme.孩子只是想玩乐:儿童对体重管理计划的体验。
Br J Health Psychol. 2016 May;21(2):407-20. doi: 10.1111/bjhp.12175. Epub 2015 Dec 11.

本文引用的文献

1
Efficacy of a county-wide schools weight management intervention.全县范围学校体重管理干预的效果。
Perspect Public Health. 2022 Nov;142(6):319-327. doi: 10.1177/17579139211006738. Epub 2021 May 15.
2
School-based interventions for the treatment of childhood obesity: a systematic review, meta-analysis and meta-regression of cluster randomised controlled trials.基于学校的干预措施治疗儿童肥胖症:系统评价、荟萃分析和聚类随机对照试验的荟萃回归分析。
Public Health Nutr. 2021 Jul;24(10):3087-3099. doi: 10.1017/S1368980021001117. Epub 2021 Mar 22.
3
Family-based lifestyle interventions: What makes them successful? A systematic literature review.
基于家庭的生活方式干预措施:使其成功的因素有哪些?一项系统的文献综述。
Prev Med Rep. 2020 Dec 31;21:101299. doi: 10.1016/j.pmedr.2020.101299. eCollection 2021 Mar.
4
Social disparities in obesity treatment for children age 3-10 years: A systematic review.儿童肥胖治疗中的社会差异:系统评价。
Obes Rev. 2021 Feb;22(2):e13153. doi: 10.1111/obr.13153.
5
A systematic review and meta-analysis of school-based interventions with health education to reduce body mass index in adolescents aged 10 to 19 years.一项基于学校的健康教育干预措施对 10 至 19 岁青少年体重指数降低的系统评价和荟萃分析。
Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2021 Jan 4;18(1):1. doi: 10.1186/s12966-020-01065-9.
6
Importance of Self-Efficacy in Eating Behavior and Physical Activity Change of Overweight and Non-Overweight Adolescent Girls Participating in Healthy Me: A Lifestyle Intervention with Mobile Technology.超重和非超重青春期女孩参与“健康我”:利用移动技术进行生活方式干预的自我效能感对饮食行为和身体活动改变的重要性。
Nutrients. 2020 Jul 17;12(7):2128. doi: 10.3390/nu12072128.
7
Using natural experiments to improve public health evidence: a review of context and utility for obesity prevention.利用自然实验改善公共卫生证据:肥胖预防的背景和效用综述。
Health Res Policy Syst. 2020 May 18;18(1):48. doi: 10.1186/s12961-020-00564-2.
8
Association of childhood obesity with risk of early all-cause and cause-specific mortality: A Swedish prospective cohort study.儿童肥胖与早发性全因和特定原因死亡率风险的关联:一项瑞典前瞻性队列研究。
PLoS Med. 2020 Mar 18;17(3):e1003078. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1003078. eCollection 2020 Mar.
9
Interventions for preventing obesity in children.儿童肥胖预防干预措施。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2019 Jul 23;7(7):CD001871. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001871.pub4.
10
Recruitment strategies for predominantly low-income, multi-racial/ethnic children and parents to 3-year community-based intervention trials: Childhood Obesity Prevention and Treatment Research (COPTR) Consortium.主要针对低收入、多种族/族裔儿童和家长的招募策略,以开展为期 3 年的社区为基础的干预试验:儿童肥胖预防和治疗研究(COPTR)联盟。
Trials. 2019 May 28;20(1):296. doi: 10.1186/s13063-019-3418-0.