Suppr超能文献

抗性淀粉摄入对 2 型糖尿病患者血糖控制和血糖变异性的影响:一项随机交叉研究。

Resistant Starch Consumption Effects on Glycemic Control and Glycemic Variability in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes: A Randomized Crossover Study.

机构信息

Centro de Investigación, División Académica de Ciencias de la Salud (DACS), Universidad Juárez Autónoma de Tabasco (UJAT), Villahermosa 86150, Mexico.

Departamento de Medicina Interna, Hospital General de Zona No. 46, Instituto Mexicano del Seguro Social (IMSS), Villahermosa 86060, Mexico.

出版信息

Nutrients. 2021 Nov 12;13(11):4052. doi: 10.3390/nu13114052.

Abstract

We previously observed beneficial effects of native banana starch (NBS) with a high resistant starch (RS) content on glycemic response in lean and obese participants. Here, we aimed to determine the effects of NBS and high-amylose maize starch (HMS) on glycemic control (GC) and glycemic variability (GV) in patients with type 2 diabetes (T2D) when treatments were matched for digestible starch content. In a randomized, crossover study, continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) was performed in 17 participants (aged 28-65 years, BMI ≥ 25 kg/m, both genders) consuming HMS, NBS, or digestible maize starch (DMS) for 4 days. HMS and NBS induced an increase in 24 h mean blood glucose during days 2 to 4 ( < 0.05). CONGA, GRADE, and J-index values were higher in HMS compared with DMS only at day 4 ( < 0.05). Yet, NBS intake provoked a reduction in fasting glycemia changes from baseline compared with DMS ( = 0.0074). In conclusion, under the experimental conditions, RS from two sources did not improve GC or GV. Future longer studies are needed to determine whether these findings were affected by a different baseline microbiota or other environmental factors.

摘要

我们之前观察到富含抗性淀粉的天然香蕉淀粉(NBS)对瘦人和肥胖参与者的血糖反应有有益的影响。在这里,我们旨在确定 NBS 和高直链淀粉玉米淀粉(HMS)在 2 型糖尿病(T2D)患者中的血糖控制(GC)和血糖变异性(GV)的影响,当治疗方法与可消化淀粉含量相匹配时。在一项随机交叉研究中,17 名参与者(年龄 28-65 岁,BMI≥25kg/m2,男女)连续 4 天食用 HMS、NBS 或可消化玉米淀粉(DMS)进行连续血糖监测(CGM)。HMS 和 NBS 在第 2 至第 4 天期间导致 24 小时平均血糖升高(<0.05)。仅在第 4 天,CONGA、GRADE 和 J-index 值在 HMS 中比 DMS 更高(<0.05)。然而,与 DMS 相比,NBS 摄入可减少空腹血糖从基线的变化(=0.0074)。总之,在实验条件下,两种来源的 RS 并未改善 GC 或 GV。需要进行更长时间的未来研究,以确定这些发现是否受到不同的基线微生物群或其他环境因素的影响。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/dae5/8621288/ceed5439f3ea/nutrients-13-04052-g001.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验