• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利：CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法，用中文像聊天一样搜索，搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐，让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版，准确专业，支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式，支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述，25分钟生成高质量综述，智能提取关键信息，辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

The clinician's guide to p values, confidence intervals, and magnitude of effects.

作者信息

Phillips Mark R, Wykoff Charles C, Thabane Lehana, Bhandari Mohit, Chaudhary Varun

机构信息

Department of Health Research Methods, Evidence, and Impact, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada.

Retina Consultants of Texas (Retina Consultants of America), Houston, TX, USA.

出版信息

Eye (Lond). 2022 Feb;36(2):341-342. doi: 10.1038/s41433-021-01863-w. Epub 2021 Nov 26.

DOI:10.1038/s41433-021-01863-w
PMID:34837035
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8807597/
Abstract
摘要

相似文献

1
The clinician's guide to p values, confidence intervals, and magnitude of effects.临床医生关于P值、置信区间和效应大小的指南。
Eye (Lond). 2022 Feb;36(2):341-342. doi: 10.1038/s41433-021-01863-w. Epub 2021 Nov 26.
2
Correction to: The clinician's guide to p values, confidence intervals, and magnitude of effects.对《临床医生的P值、置信区间和效应量指南》的勘误
Eye (Lond). 2023 May;37(7):1515. doi: 10.1038/s41433-021-01914-2.
3
The clinician's guide to the literature: interpreting results.临床医生文献指南：解读结果
J Am Dent Assoc. 2009 Jan;140(1):48-54; quiz 112. doi: 10.14219/jada.archive.2009.0017.
4
Clinician's Subjective Experience in the Cross-Cultural Psychiatric Encounter.临床医生在跨文化精神医学遭遇中的主观体验。
Psychopathology. 2020;53(5-6):282-290. doi: 10.1159/000509489. Epub 2020 Sep 3.
5
Relationship Between Gender and Clinician's Subjective Experience during the Interaction with Psychiatric Patients.性别与临床医生在与精神科患者互动过程中的主观体验之间的关系。
Clin Pract Epidemiol Ment Health. 2021 Dec 22;17:190-197. doi: 10.2174/1745017902117010190. eCollection 2021.
6
A Clinician's Brief Guide to the Mental Health Act Zigmond Tony and Brindle Nick A Clinician's Brief Guide to the Mental Health Act 180pp £18 RCPsych Publications 9781909726628 1908020024 [Formula: see text].《临床医生简明精神卫生法指南》 齐格蒙德·托尼 与 布林德尔·尼克 《临床医生简明精神卫生法指南》 180页 18英镑 皇家精神病学院出版社 9781909726628 1908020024 [公式：见正文]
Emerg Nurse. 2017 Mar 10;24(10):17. doi: 10.7748/en.24.10.17.s22.
7
Association between Clinician's Subjective Experience during Patient Evaluation and Psychiatric Diagnosis.患者评估期间临床医生的主观体验与精神科诊断之间的关联
Psychopathology. 2016;49(2):83-94. doi: 10.1159/000444506. Epub 2016 Apr 14.
8
The Clinician's Subjective Experience during the Interaction with Adolescent Psychiatric Patients: Validity and Reliability of the Assessment of Clinician's Subjective Experience.临床医生与青少年精神科患者互动时的主观体验：临床医生主观体验评估的效度和信度。
Psychopathology. 2021;54(3):119-126. doi: 10.1159/000513769. Epub 2021 Mar 31.
9
Value of parental concern and clinician's gut feeling in recognition of serious bacterial infections: a prospective observational study.父母的关注和临床医生的直觉在识别严重细菌感染中的价值：一项前瞻性观察研究。
BMC Pediatr. 2019 Jul 3;19(1):219. doi: 10.1186/s12887-019-1591-7.
10
The P Value Problem in Otolaryngology: Shifting to Effect Sizes and Confidence Intervals.耳鼻喉科中的P值问题：转向效应量和置信区间
Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2017 Jun;156(6):978-980. doi: 10.1177/0194599816677735. Epub 2016 Nov 14.

引用本文的文献

1
Multi-omics analysis reveals the efficacy of two probiotic strains in managing feline chronic kidney disease through gut microbiome and host metabolome.多组学分析揭示了两种益生菌菌株通过肠道微生物群和宿主代谢组来管理猫慢性肾病的功效。
Front Vet Sci. 2025 Jun 18;12:1590388. doi: 10.3389/fvets.2025.1590388. eCollection 2025.
2
A systematic review and meta-analysis on pharmacist-led interventions for the management of peptic ulcer disease.关于药师主导的消化性溃疡疾病管理干预措施的系统评价和荟萃分析。
PLoS One. 2025 Mar 25;20(3):e0320181. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0320181. eCollection 2025.
3
Exploring the fragility of meta-analyses in ophthalmology: a systematic review.探索眼科学中荟萃分析的脆弱性：系统评价。
Eye (Lond). 2024 Nov;38(16):3153-3160. doi: 10.1038/s41433-024-03255-2. Epub 2024 Jul 20.
4
Statistical characteristics of analytical studies published in Peruvian medical journals from 2021 to 2022: A methodological study.2021 年至 2022 年秘鲁医学期刊发表的分析性研究的统计学特征：方法学研究。
PLoS One. 2024 Jul 3;19(7):e0306334. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0306334. eCollection 2024.
5
Diabetes increases risk of lumbar spinal fusion complications: association with altered structure of newly formed bone at the fusion site.糖尿病会增加腰椎融合术并发症的风险：与融合部位新形成骨结构改变有关。
JBMR Plus. 2024 Apr 15;8(6):ziae053. doi: 10.1093/jbmrpl/ziae053. eCollection 2024 Jun.
6
Use of Research in the Nursing Practice: from Statistical Significance to Clinical Significance.护理实践中的研究应用：从统计学意义到临床意义。
Invest Educ Enferm. 2023 Nov;41(3). doi: 10.17533/udea.iee.v41n3e12.
7
Investigating the Efficacy of Kidney-Protective Mixture-Containing Pet Treats in Feline Chronic Kidney Disease and Its Possible Mechanism.研究含肾脏保护混合物的宠物食品对猫慢性肾病的疗效及其可能机制。
Animals (Basel). 2024 Feb 16;14(4):630. doi: 10.3390/ani14040630.
8
Out-of-pocket spending and health care utilization associated with initiation of different medications for opioid use disorder: Findings from a national commercially insured cohort.与阿片类药物使用障碍的不同药物治疗起始相关的自付支出和医疗保健利用：来自全国商业保险队列的研究结果。
J Subst Use Addict Treat. 2024 Apr;159:209281. doi: 10.1016/j.josat.2023.209281. Epub 2023 Dec 18.

本文引用的文献

1
Shifting the focus away from binary thinking of statistical significance and towards education for key stakeholders: revisiting the debate on whether it's time to de-emphasize or get rid of statistical significance.将重点从统计显著性的二元思维转移到关键利益相关者的教育上：重新审视是否是时候降低或消除统计显著性的争论。
J Clin Epidemiol. 2021 Sep;137:104-112. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2021.03.033. Epub 2021 Apr 8.
2
Evaluating the credibility of anchor based estimates of minimal important differences for patient reported outcomes: instrument development and reliability study.评估基于锚点的患者报告结局最小重要差异估计值的可信度：仪器开发和可靠性研究。
BMJ. 2020 Jun 4;369:m1714. doi: 10.1136/bmj.m1714.
3
Letter to the Editor: Editorial: Threshold P Values in Orthopaedic Research-We Know the Problem. What is the Solution?致编辑的信：社论：骨科研究中的阈值P值——我们知道问题所在。解决方案是什么？
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2019 Jul;477(7):1756-1758. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000000827.
4
Misconceptions, Misuses, and Misinterpretations of P Values and Significance Testing.对 P 值和显著性检验的误解、误用和曲解。
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2017 Sep 20;99(18):1598-1603. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.16.01314.
5
Statistical tests, P values, confidence intervals, and power: a guide to misinterpretations.统计检验、P 值、置信区间与检验效能：误解指南
Eur J Epidemiol. 2016 Apr;31(4):337-50. doi: 10.1007/s10654-016-0149-3. Epub 2016 May 21.
6
Toward evidence-based medical statistics. 1: The P value fallacy.迈向循证医学统计学。1：P值谬误。
Ann Intern Med. 1999 Jun 15;130(12):995-1004. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-130-12-199906150-00008.