McNair Keara M, Zeitlin Dana, Slivka Anna Marie, Lequerica Anthony H, Stubblefield Michael D
Kessler Institute for Rehabilitation, West Orange, New Jersey, USA.
Kessler Institute for Rehabilitation, Saddle Brook, New Jersey, USA.
PM R. 2023 Jan;15(1):65-68. doi: 10.1002/pmrj.12741. Epub 2022 Jan 5.
Better tools are needed to predict functional decline and oncologic prognosis in inpatient cancer rehabilitation. The Karnofky Performance Status (KPS) is a widely used scale of functional performance in oncology, although the scale differs from current rehabilitation terminology. Use of the KPS in inpatient rehabilitation may support a shared method of communication between cancer rehabilitation providers and the primary oncology teams.
To establish interrater reliability for translation of the KPS for use in inpatient cancer rehabilitation.
Retrospective interrater reliability review.
A large inpatient rehabilitation hospital system.
Fifty randomized charts were chosen for review from a larger database of all patients admitted to an inpatient cancer rehabilitation program in 2020.
Not applicable.
The KPS scale was translated into common inpatient rehabilitation grading consistent with the Continuity and Assessment Record and Evaluation (CARE) Item Set to support its use in this specialty area. Additionally, a list of best practice guidelines and scoring instructions were created to assist raters in determining appropriate levels within the scale. Members of the inpatient cancer rehabilitation team scored all patients within the larger database (n = 424) throughout 2020. A blinded rater completed retrospective chart reviews to score the 50-chart sample. A two-way random effects model was used to calculate an intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) for the KPS scores at each of three time points (premorbid, admission, and discharge).
The KPS interpretation for rehabilitation proved to be statistically reliable for the 50-chart sample. The premorbid KPS interrater reliability was acceptable (ICC = 0.67; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.40-0.82), admission KPS reliability was good (ICC = 0.88, 95% CI: 0.78-0.93), and discharge reliability was excellent (ICC = 0.96; 95% CI: 0.91-0.98).
The KPS translation at three time points (premorbid, admission, and discharge) during the inpatient rehabilitation continuum has acceptable interrater reliability.
需要更好的工具来预测癌症住院患者康复过程中的功能衰退和肿瘤预后。卡诺夫斯基功能状态量表(KPS)是肿瘤学中广泛使用的功能表现量表,尽管该量表与当前的康复术语有所不同。在住院康复中使用KPS可能有助于癌症康复提供者与肿瘤学初级团队之间形成一种共享的沟通方式。
确定用于癌症住院患者康复的KPS翻译版本的评分者间信度。
回顾性评分者间信度评估。
一个大型住院康复医院系统。
从2020年所有入住癌症住院康复项目患者的更大数据库中随机选择50份病历进行审查。
不适用。
KPS量表被翻译成与连续性和评估记录与评价(CARE)项目集一致的常见住院康复分级,以支持其在该专业领域的使用。此外,还制定了一份最佳实践指南和评分说明清单,以帮助评分者确定量表内的适当水平。癌症住院康复团队成员在2020年对更大数据库(n = 424)中的所有患者进行评分。一名盲态评分者完成对50份病历样本的回顾性评分。使用双向随机效应模型计算三个时间点(病前、入院和出院)每个时间点KPS评分的组内相关系数(ICC)。
对于50份病历样本,KPS康复解释在统计学上具有可靠性。病前KPS评分者间信度可以接受(ICC = 0.67;95%置信区间[CI]:0.40 - 0.82),入院时KPS信度良好(ICC = 0.88,95% CI:0.78 - 0.93),出院时信度极佳(ICC = 0.96;95% CI:0.91 - 0.98)。
在住院康复连续过程中的三个时间点(病前、入院和出院),KPS翻译版本具有可接受的评分者间信度。