Suppr超能文献

旁观者心肺复苏和旁观者目击院外心脏骤停后神经功能完整存活的调度员指令:一项全国性、基于人群的观察性研究。

Dispatcher instructions for bystander cardiopulmonary resuscitation and neurologically intact survival after bystander-witnessed out-of-hospital cardiac arrests: a nationwide, population-based observational study.

机构信息

Department of Emergency and Critical Care Medicine, Kanazawa University Hospital, Takaramachi 13-1, Kanazawa, 920-8640, Japan.

Department of Cardiology, Osaka Saiseikai Senri Hospital, Tukumodai 1-1-6, Suita, 565-0862, Japan.

出版信息

Crit Care. 2021 Nov 27;25(1):408. doi: 10.1186/s13054-021-03825-w.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

The International Liaison Committee on Resuscitation recommends that dispatchers provide instructions to perform compression-only cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) to callers responding to adults with out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA). This study aimed to determine the optimal dispatcher-assisted CPR (DA-CPR) instructions for OHCA.

METHODS

We analysed the records of 24,947 adult patients (aged ≥ 18 years) who received bystander DA-CPR after bystander-witnessed OHCA. Data were obtained from a prospectively recorded Japanese nationwide Utstein-style database for a 2-year period (2016-2017). Patients were divided into compression-only DA-CPR (n = 22,778) and conventional DA-CPR (with a compression-to-ventilation ratio of 30:2, n = 2169) groups. The primary outcome measure was 1-month neurological intact survival, defined as a cerebral performance category score of 1-2 (CPC 1-2).

RESULTS

The 1-month CPC 1-2 rate was significantly higher in the conventional DA-CPR group than in the compression-only DA-CPR group (before propensity score (PS) matching, 7.5% [162/2169] versus 5.8% [1309/22778], p < 0.01; after PS matching, 7.5% (162/2169) versus 5.7% (123/2169), p < 0.05). Compared with compression-only DA-CPR, conventional DA-CPR was associated with increased odds of 1-month CPC 1-2 (before PS matching, adjusted odds ratio 1.39, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.14-1.70, p < 0.01; after PS matching, adjusted odds ratio 1.34, 95% CI 1.00-1.79, p < 0.05).

CONCLUSION

Within the limitations of this retrospective observational study, conventional DA-CPR with a compression-to-ventilation ratio of 30:2 was preferable to compression-only DA-CPR as an optimal DA-CPR instruction for coaching callers to perform bystander CPR for adult patients with bystander-witnessed OHCAs.

摘要

背景

国际复苏联合会建议调度员向响应院外心脏骤停(OHCA)的呼叫者提供仅进行按压的心肺复苏(CPR)指导。本研究旨在确定 OHCA 的最佳调度员辅助 CPR(DA-CPR)指导。

方法

我们分析了 24947 名接受旁观者 DA-CPR 的成年患者(年龄≥18 岁)的记录,这些患者在旁观者目击 OHCA 后接受了旁观者 DA-CPR。数据来自一个前瞻性记录的日本全国性乌斯丁式数据库,为期 2 年(2016-2017 年)。患者分为仅按压 DA-CPR(n=22778)和常规 DA-CPR(按压通气比为 30:2,n=2169)组。主要结局指标是 1 个月时神经功能完整存活,定义为脑功能分类评分 1-2 级(CPC 1-2)。

结果

在常规 DA-CPR 组中,1 个月时 CPC 1-2 率明显高于仅按压 DA-CPR 组(在进行倾向评分(PS)匹配之前,7.5%[162/2169]与 5.8%[1309/22778],p<0.01;在进行 PS 匹配后,7.5%[162/2169]与 5.7%[123/2169],p<0.05)。与仅按压 DA-CPR 相比,常规 DA-CPR 与 1 个月时 CPC 1-2 的可能性增加相关(在 PS 匹配之前,调整后的优势比 1.39,95%置信区间 [CI] 1.14-1.70,p<0.01;在 PS 匹配后,调整后的优势比 1.34,95% CI 1.00-1.79,p<0.05)。

结论

在本回顾性观察研究的限制内,与仅按压 DA-CPR 相比,30:2 的常规 DA-CPR 作为指导呼叫者对旁观者目击的 OHCA 成年患者进行旁观者 CPR 的最佳 DA-CPR 指导更可取。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d0b2/8627004/2aff37a98eed/13054_2021_3825_Fig1_HTML.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验