Department of Radiology, Anam Hospital, Korea University College of Medicine, #126-1, 5-Ka Anam-dong, Sungbuk ku, Seoul, 136-705, Republic of Korea.
Department of Biostatistics, Korea University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Eur Radiol. 2022 Apr;32(4):2781-2790. doi: 10.1007/s00330-021-08319-5. Epub 2021 Nov 27.
Although the overestimation problem of time-of-flight magnetic resonance angiography (TOF-MRA) applying the warfarin-aspirin symptomatic intracranial disease (WASID) method to assess intracranial arterial stenosis has often been suggested, no pertinent grading system for TOF-MRA has been developed. We aimed to develop and evaluate the performance of a visual grading system for intracranial arterial stenosis on TOF-MRA (MRA).
This single-center cohort study analyzed prospective observational registry data from a comprehensive stroke center between January 2014 and February 2020. Patients with confirmed stenosis of the intracranial large arteries who underwent confirmative digital subtraction angiography (DSA) were included; a 4-point grading system was developed based on physical characteristics of TOF-MRA. The overall diagnostic accuracies of MRA for each grade, interobserver reproducibility, and positive predictive values for > 50% and > 70% stenoses were evaluated.
We analyzed 132 segments with intracranial atherosclerotic stenosis from 71 patients (34 men and 37 women; mean age, 61.0 ± 15.25 years; range, 21-89 years). The overall diagnostic accuracy of MRA (93.9%, 124/132) was higher than that of MRA (50.8%, 67/132) for each grade. The degree of stenosis did not differ significantly between MRA and DSA (p = .849). Regarding reproducibility, MRA demonstrated excellent interobserver agreement (ICC, 0.989; 95% CI, 0.979-0.999). The positive predictive values of MRA for the diagnosis of > 50% and > 70% stenoses were 97.3% and 100.0%, respectively.
The new intuitive grading system accurately and reliably determined the degree of stenosis in intracranial arterial atherosclerosis patients. MRA could be a versatile alternative to MRA for evaluating intracranial arterial stenosis.
• In this retrospective diagnostic study (sample: 132 stenotic segments), the overall accuracy of the visual grading system (MRA) was 94%, and positive predictive value for > 50% stenosis was 97%. • In the era of medical treatment for intracranial atherosclerotic stenosis, MRA could be a versatile alternative method to MRA for evaluating intracranial arterial stenosis.
尽管应用华法林-阿司匹林症状性颅内疾病(WASID)方法评估颅内动脉狭窄时,有时会出现时间飞越磁共振血管造影(TOF-MRA)的高估问题,但尚未开发出相关的 TOF-MRA 分级系统。我们旨在开发和评估 TOF-MRA(MRA)上用于颅内动脉狭窄的视觉分级系统的性能。
这项单中心队列研究分析了 2014 年 1 月至 2020 年 2 月期间综合卒中中心的前瞻性观察性登记数据。纳入经确认存在颅内大血管狭窄且接受确认性数字减影血管造影(DSA)的患者;基于 TOF-MRA 的物理特征,制定了 4 分分级系统。评估了 MRA 对每个等级的整体诊断准确性、观察者间的可重复性以及对>50%和>70%狭窄的阳性预测值。
我们分析了 71 例患者(34 名男性和 37 名女性;平均年龄 61.0±15.25 岁;年龄范围 21-89 岁)的 132 个颅内动脉粥样硬化狭窄节段。MRA 的整体诊断准确性(93.9%,124/132)高于每个等级的 MRA(50.8%,67/132)。MRA 和 DSA 之间的狭窄程度无显著差异(p=0.849)。关于可重复性,MRA 显示出极好的观察者间一致性(ICC,0.989;95%CI,0.979-0.999)。MRA 对诊断>50%和>70%狭窄的阳性预测值分别为 97.3%和 100.0%。
新的直观分级系统能够准确可靠地确定颅内动脉粥样硬化患者的狭窄程度。MRA 可能是评估颅内动脉狭窄的一种多功能替代方法。
在这项回顾性诊断研究(样本:132 个狭窄节段)中,视觉分级系统(MRA)的整体准确性为 94%,对>50%狭窄的阳性预测值为 97%。
在颅内动脉粥样硬化狭窄的治疗时代,MRA 可能是评估颅内动脉狭窄的一种替代 MRA 的多功能方法。