Suppr超能文献

中重度阻塞性睡眠呼吸暂停低通气综合征患者上气道塌陷的诊断:药物诱导睡眠内镜检查与清醒检查的比较

Diagnosis of upper airways collapse in moderate-to-severe OSAHS patients: a comparison between drug-induced sleep endoscopy and the awake examination.

作者信息

Bindi Ilaria, Ori Michele, Marchegiani Mauro, Morreale Maddalena, Gallucci Luigi, Ricci Giampietro

机构信息

Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Careggi University Hospital, Largo Brambilla, 3, 50134, Florence, Italy.

Otolaryngology Department, University of Perugia, Sant'Andrea delle Fratte, 06129, Perugia, Italy.

出版信息

Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2022 Apr;279(4):2167-2173. doi: 10.1007/s00405-021-07184-8. Epub 2021 Nov 28.

Abstract

PURPOSE

Compare awake evaluation (modified Mallampati score-MMs, Müller maneuver-MM) to drug-induced sleep endoscopy (DISE) findings according to NOHL (nose-oropharynx-hypopharynx-larynx) classification in moderate-to-severe OSAHS patients.

METHODS

43 moderate-to-severe OSAHS patients referred to our ENT department were enrolled over a 2-year period. In this observational prospective study, each patient was evaluated by the same ENT team both in wakefulness and during pharmacologically induced sleep. Level and severity of the obstruction were described.

RESULTS

The comparison of degree of collapsibility was statistically significative only at hypopharyngeal level: 41.8% of the patients showed a hypopharyngeal obstruction in wakefulness whereas 88.3% in DISE (p = 0.000). Laryngeal level was found in 18.6% patients during awake examination, conversely DISE demonstrated laryngeal obstruction in 4.6%. DISE identified significantly higher incidence of multilevel collapses (p = 0.001). However, the incidence of oropharyngeal obstruction in patients classified as MMs I and II was significantly higher in DISE compared to MM (p = 0.021).

CONCLUSION

DISE is the best predictor of hypopharyngeal obstruction, whereas MM underestimates the severity of the collapse at this level. DISE is more reliable than MM to identify the obstruction in patients with MMs score I and II.

摘要

目的

根据中度至重度阻塞性睡眠呼吸暂停低通气综合征(OSAHS)患者的鼻-口咽-下咽-喉(NOHL)分类,比较清醒评估(改良马兰帕蒂评分-MMs、米勒动作-MM)与药物诱导睡眠内镜检查(DISE)的结果。

方法

在两年期间纳入了43名转诊至我们耳鼻喉科的中度至重度OSAHS患者。在这项观察性前瞻性研究中,每位患者在清醒状态和药物诱导睡眠期间均由同一耳鼻喉科团队进行评估。描述了阻塞的水平和严重程度。

结果

仅在下咽水平,可塌陷程度的比较具有统计学意义:41.8%的患者在清醒时表现为下咽阻塞,而在DISE中为88.3%(p = 0.000)。清醒检查时18.6%的患者发现有喉水平阻塞,相反,DISE显示喉阻塞的比例为4.6%。DISE发现多级塌陷的发生率显著更高(p = 0.001)。然而,与MM相比,DISE中MM I和II级患者的口咽阻塞发生率显著更高(p = 0.021)。

结论

DISE是下咽阻塞的最佳预测指标,而MM低估了该水平塌陷的严重程度。对于MM评分I和II的患者,DISE在识别阻塞方面比MM更可靠。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验