Dijemeni Esuabom, D'Amone Gabriele, Gbati Israel
Research and Development Department, DISE INNOVATION, 24 Park Central Building, Bow Quarters, 60 Fairfield Road, London, UK.
Department of Bioengineering, Imperial College London, London, UK.
Sleep Breath. 2017 Dec;21(4):983-994. doi: 10.1007/s11325-017-1521-6. Epub 2017 Jun 6.
Drug-induced sedation endoscopy (DISE) classification systems have been used to assess anatomical findings on upper airway obstruction, and decide and plan surgical treatments and act as a predictor for surgical treatment outcome for obstructive sleep apnoea management. The first objective is to identify if there is a universally accepted DISE grading and classification system for analysing DISE findings. The second objective is to identify if there is one DISE grading and classification treatment planning framework for deciding appropriate surgical treatment for obstructive sleep apnoea (OSA). The third objective is to identify if there is one DISE grading and classification treatment outcome framework for determining the likelihood of success for a given OSA surgical intervention.
A systematic review was performed to identify new and significantly modified DISE classification systems: concept, advantages and disadvantages.
Fourteen studies proposing a new DISE classification system and three studies proposing a significantly modified DISE classification were identified. None of the studies were based on randomised control trials.
DISE is an objective method for visualising upper airway obstruction. The classification and assessment of clinical findings based on DISE is highly subjective due to the increasing number of DISE classification systems. Hence, this creates a growing divergence in surgical treatment planning and treatment outcome. Further research on a universally accepted objective DISE assessment is critically needed.
药物诱导镇静内镜检查(DISE)分类系统已被用于评估上气道阻塞的解剖学发现,决定并规划手术治疗,以及作为阻塞性睡眠呼吸暂停管理手术治疗结果的预测指标。第一个目标是确定是否存在一个被普遍接受的用于分析DISE检查结果的分级和分类系统。第二个目标是确定是否存在一个用于为阻塞性睡眠呼吸暂停(OSA)决定合适手术治疗的DISE分级和分类治疗规划框架。第三个目标是确定是否存在一个用于确定特定OSA手术干预成功可能性的DISE分级和分类治疗结果框架。
进行了一项系统评价,以识别新的和有显著修改的DISE分类系统:概念、优缺点。
识别出14项提出新DISE分类系统的研究和3项提出有显著修改的DISE分类的研究。这些研究均未基于随机对照试验。
DISE是一种可视化上气道阻塞的客观方法。由于DISE分类系统数量不断增加,基于DISE的临床发现分类和评估具有高度主观性。因此,这在手术治疗规划和治疗结果方面造成了越来越大的差异。迫切需要对一种被普遍接受的客观DISE评估进行进一步研究。