Division of Cardiology, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, 94143, USA.
Department of Internal Medicine, San Joaquin General Hospital, 500 W Hospital Rd, French Camp, CA, 95231, USA.
J Interv Card Electrophysiol. 2023 Aug;66(5):1067-1075. doi: 10.1007/s10840-021-01076-x. Epub 2021 Nov 27.
Rotating and laser sheaths are both routinely used in transvenous lead extraction (TLE) which can lead to catastrophic complications including death. The efficacy and risk of each approach are uncertain. To perform a meta-analysis to compare success and mortality rates associated with rotating and laser sheaths.
We searched electronic academic databases for case series of consecutive patients and randomized controlled trials published 1998-2017 describing the use of rotating and laser sheaths for TLE. Among 48 studies identified, rotating sheaths included 1,094 patients with 1,955 leads in 14 studies, and laser sheaths included 7,775 patients with 12,339 leads in 34 studies. Patients receiving rotating sheaths were older (63 versus 60 years old) and were more often male (74% versus 72%); CRT-P/Ds were more commonly extracted using rotating sheaths (12% versus 7%), whereas ICDs were less common (37% versus 42%), p > 0.05 for all. Infection as an indication for lead extraction was higher in the rotating sheath group (59.8% versus 52.9%, p = 0.002). The mean time from initial lead implantation was 7.2 years for rotating sheaths and 6.3 years for laser sheaths (p > 0.05).
Success rates for complete removal of transvenous leads were 95.1% in rotating sheaths and 93.4% in laser sheaths (p < 0.05). There was one death among 1,094 patients (0.09%) in rotating sheaths and 66 deaths among 7,775 patients (0.85%) in laser sheaths, translating to a 9.3-fold higher risk of death with laser sheaths (95% CI 1.3 to 66.9, p = 0.01).
Laser sheaths were associated with lower complete lead removal rate and a 9.3-fold higher risk of death.
旋转和激光鞘管均常用于经静脉导线拔除术(TLE),这可能导致灾难性的并发症,包括死亡。每种方法的疗效和风险均不确定。为了进行荟萃分析,以比较与旋转和激光鞘管相关的成功率和死亡率。
我们检索了电子学术数据库,以查找 1998 年至 2017 年期间连续患者的病例系列和随机对照试验,这些研究描述了使用旋转和激光鞘管进行 TLE。在确定的 48 项研究中,旋转鞘管包括 14 项研究中的 1094 例患者和 1955 条导线,激光鞘管包括 34 项研究中的 7775 例患者和 12339 条导线。接受旋转鞘管的患者年龄更大(63 岁 vs 60 岁),且更常为男性(74% vs 72%);使用旋转鞘管更常拔除 CRT-P/D(12% vs 7%),而 ICD 则较少见(37% vs 42%),所有差异均无统计学意义(p>0.05)。因感染而需要进行导线拔除的患者在旋转鞘管组中比例更高(59.8% vs 52.9%,p=0.002)。旋转鞘管的初始导线植入时间的平均值为 7.2 年,激光鞘管为 6.3 年(p>0.05)。
在旋转鞘管中完全去除经静脉导线的成功率为 95.1%,在激光鞘管中为 93.4%(p<0.05)。在 1094 例患者中,有 1 例(0.09%)死亡,在 7775 例患者中,有 66 例(0.85%)死亡,这意味着使用激光鞘管的死亡风险高 9.3 倍(95%CI 1.3 至 66.9,p=0.01)。
激光鞘管与较低的完全导线移除率和高 9.3 倍的死亡风险相关。