• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

高频激光鞘管用于导线取出术:单中心经验

Lead extraction with high frequency laser sheaths: a single-centre experience.

作者信息

Pecha Simon, Linder Matthias, Gosau Nils, Castro Liesa, Vogler Julia, Willems Stephan, Reichenspurner Hermann, Hakmi Samer

机构信息

Department of Cardiovascular Surgery, University Heart Center Hamburg, Hamburg, Germany.

Department of Cardiology, Electrophysiology, University Heart Center Hamburg, Hamburg, Germany.

出版信息

Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2017 May 1;51(5):902-905. doi: 10.1093/ejcts/ezw425.

DOI:10.1093/ejcts/ezw425
PMID:28137751
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

Extraction of chronically implanted cardiac implantable electrophysiological devices leads can be difficult. Excimer laser-assisted extraction with 40 Hz sheaths has shown good results in challenging cases. In 2012, a new 80 Hz high-frequency laser sheath became available that delivers twice as many pulses per second. Here, we report our clinical experience with the new GlideLight 80 Hz laser sheath.

METHODS

Between January 2012 and August 2016, 292 leads were treated in 151 patients using 80 Hz GlideLight laser sheath. Lead extraction indications included systemic infection or lead endocarditis n =  35 (23.2%), local infection n =  73 (48.3%), lead dysfunction n =  32 (21.2%), system upgrade n =  5 (3.3%), tricuspid regurgitation n =  3 (2.0%) and other indications n =  3 (2.0). All patient-related and procedural data were collected into a database and analysed.

RESULTS

Mean patient's age was 66.2 ± 14.4 years, 73.5% were male. Ninety-one (31.2%) atrial, 159 (54.4%) ventricular and 42 (14.4%) coronary sinus leads had to be extracted. The mean time from initial lead implantation was 98.0 ± 65.2 months. Mean laser treatment time was 67.5 ± 71.3 s, mean laser pulses delivered were 5130 ± 6592. Clinical success was achieved in 99.3% of the cases, while complete procedural success was observed in 96.7%. A failure of extraction was seen in 2 (1.3%) patients. An overall complication rate of 2.0%, including two major (1.3%) and one minor (0.7%) complications, was observed. No periprocedural mortality was seen.

CONCLUSIONS

The new GlideLight high-frequency laser sheath allows for a high safety and efficacy in extraction of chronically implanted pacemaker- and implantable cardioverter-defibrillator leads.

摘要

目的

长期植入的心脏植入式电生理设备导线的拔除可能具有挑战性。准分子激光辅助结合40Hz鞘管拔除术在复杂病例中已显示出良好效果。2012年,一种新型的80Hz高频激光鞘管问世,其每秒发射的脉冲数量是之前的两倍。在此,我们报告使用新型GlideLight 80Hz激光鞘管的临床经验。

方法

在2012年1月至2016年8月期间,151例患者的292根导线使用80Hz GlideLight激光鞘管进行了处理。导线拔除指征包括全身性感染或导线心内膜炎n = 35例(23.2%)、局部感染n = 73例(48.3%)、导线功能障碍n = 32例(21.2%)、系统升级n = 5例(3.3%)、三尖瓣反流n = 3例(2.0%)以及其他指征n = 3例(2.0%)。所有与患者相关的和手术相关的数据均收集到数据库中并进行分析。

结果

患者平均年龄为66.2±14.4岁,73.5%为男性。需要拔除91根(31.2%)心房导线、159根(54.4%)心室导线和42根(14.4%)冠状静脉窦导线。从最初植入导线到此次处理的平均时间为98.0±65.2个月。平均激光治疗时间为67.5±71.3秒,平均发射的激光脉冲数为5130±6592个。99.3%的病例获得了临床成功,96.7%观察到了完全手术成功。2例(1.3%)患者拔除失败。观察到总体并发症发生率为2.0%,包括2例严重并发症(1.3%)和1例轻微并发症(0.7%)。未观察到围手术期死亡。

结论

新型GlideLight高频激光鞘管在长期植入的起搏器和植入式心脏复律除颤器导线拔除中具有较高的安全性和有效性。

相似文献

1
Lead extraction with high frequency laser sheaths: a single-centre experience.高频激光鞘管用于导线取出术:单中心经验
Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2017 May 1;51(5):902-905. doi: 10.1093/ejcts/ezw425.
2
Initial experience of pacemaker and implantable cardioverter defibrillator lead extraction with the new GlideLight 80 Hz laser sheaths.使用新型GlideLight 80 Hz激光鞘管进行起搏器和植入式心脏复律除颤器导线拔除的初步经验。
Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg. 2014 Jan;18(1):56-60. doi: 10.1093/icvts/ivt428. Epub 2013 Sep 30.
3
Differences in laser lead extraction of infected vs. non-infected leads.感染性与非感染性导线的激光导线拔除差异。
Heart Vessels. 2018 Oct;33(10):1245-1250. doi: 10.1007/s00380-018-1162-0. Epub 2018 Apr 5.
4
Lead extraction experience with high frequency excimer laser.高频准分子激光取铅经验
Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 2014 Sep;37(9):1120-8. doi: 10.1111/pace.12406. Epub 2014 Apr 26.
5
Laser lead extraction allows for safe and effective removal of single- and dual-coil implantable cardioverter defibrillator leads: A single-centre experience over 12 years.激光导线拔除术可安全有效地移除单线圈和双线圈植入式心脏复律除颤器导线:一项为期12年的单中心经验。
Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg. 2017 Jan;24(1):77-81. doi: 10.1093/icvts/ivw298. Epub 2016 Sep 13.
6
Initial experience using Excimer laser for the extraction of chronically implanted pacemaker and implantable cardioverter defibrillator leads in Japanese patients.在日本患者中使用准分子激光提取慢性植入式起搏器和植入式心脏复律除颤器导线的初步经验。
J Cardiol. 2013 Sep;62(3):195-200. doi: 10.1016/j.jjcc.2013.03.012. Epub 2013 May 30.
7
Safety and Efficacy of Transvenous Lead Extraction With a High-Frequency Excimer Laser - A Single Center Experience.经静脉心内膜导线拔除术联合高频准分子激光的安全性和有效性:单中心经验。
Circ J. 2018 Nov 24;82(12):2992-2997. doi: 10.1253/circj.CJ-18-0869. Epub 2018 Oct 12.
8
Laser-assisted lead extraction: the European experience.激光辅助导线拔除术:欧洲经验
Europace. 2007 Aug;9(8):651-6. doi: 10.1093/europace/eum098. Epub 2007 Jun 27.
9
Single-center experience with percutaneous lead extraction of cardiac implantable electric devices.心脏植入式电子装置经皮导线拔除的单中心经验
J Cardiol. 2018 Feb;71(2):192-196. doi: 10.1016/j.jjcc.2017.07.011. Epub 2017 Sep 13.
10
[Pacemaker/ICD lead extraction with the excimer laser sheath: a single center experience].
Zhonghua Xin Xue Guan Bing Za Zhi. 2011 Apr;39(4):363-8. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.0253-3758.2011.04.017.

引用本文的文献

1
Cardiac angiosarcoma: how multimodality imaging and excimer laser assisted intracardiac biopsy led to the correct diagnosis-a case report.心脏血管肉瘤:多模态成像和准分子激光辅助心内活检如何促成正确诊断——病例报告
Eur Heart J Case Rep. 2024 Aug 24;8(12):ytae433. doi: 10.1093/ehjcr/ytae433. eCollection 2024 Dec.
2
Safety and Efficacy of Excimer Laser Powered Lead Extractions in Obese Patients: A GALLERY Subgroup Analysis.准分子激光辅助肥胖患者导线拔除术的安全性和有效性:一项GALLERY亚组分析
J Clin Med. 2023 Jun 16;12(12):4096. doi: 10.3390/jcm12124096.
3
Think outside the box: a case report of utilization of an excimer laser sheath as an intracardiac bioptome.
跳出框框思考:使用准分子激光鞘作为心内活检钳的病例报告。
Eur Heart J Case Rep. 2023 Feb 27;7(3):ytad107. doi: 10.1093/ehjcr/ytad107. eCollection 2023 Mar.
4
Atrial Fibrillation and Transvenous Lead Extraction-A Comprehensive Subgroup Analysis of the GermAn Laser Lead Extraction RegistrY (GALLERY).心房颤动与经静脉心脏导线拔除术:德国激光心脏导线拔除登记研究(GALLERY)的全面亚组分析。
Medicina (Kaunas). 2022 Nov 21;58(11):1685. doi: 10.3390/medicina58111685.
5
Efficacy and mortality of rotating sheaths versus laser sheaths for transvenous lead extraction: a meta-analysis.旋转鞘与激光鞘在经静脉导线拔除术中的疗效和死亡率:一项荟萃分析。
J Interv Card Electrophysiol. 2023 Aug;66(5):1067-1075. doi: 10.1007/s10840-021-01076-x. Epub 2021 Nov 27.
6
Safety and efficacy of transvenous lead extraction of very old leads.非常陈旧心内导线经静脉途径安全有效拔除。
Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg. 2021 Apr 8;32(3):402-407. doi: 10.1093/icvts/ivaa278.
7
Strategies for Transvenous Lead Extraction Procedures.经静脉导线拔除术的策略
J Innov Card Rhythm Manag. 2017 May 15;8(5):2702-2716. doi: 10.19102/icrm.2017.080502. eCollection 2017 May.
8
Transvenous Lead Extractions: Current Approaches and Future Trends.经静脉导线拔除:当前方法与未来趋势。
Arrhythm Electrophysiol Rev. 2018 Aug;7(3):210-217. doi: 10.15420/aer.2018.33.2.
9
Are Endovascular Interventions for Central Vein Obstructions due to Cardiac Implanted Electronic Devices Effective?心脏植入电子设备所致中心静脉阻塞的血管内介入治疗是否有效?
Front Surg. 2018 Jul 30;5:49. doi: 10.3389/fsurg.2018.00049. eCollection 2018.