Department of Surgery, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Department of Radiology, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Colorectal Dis. 2022 Mar;24(3):292-307. doi: 10.1111/codi.16005. Epub 2021 Dec 7.
The sigmoid take-off (STO), the point on imaging where the sigmoid sweeps ventral from the sacrum, was chosen as the definition of the rectum during an international Delphi consensus meeting and has been incorporated into the Dutch guidelines since October 2019. The aim of this study was to evaluate the implementation of this landmark 1 year after the guideline implementation and to perform a quality assessment of the STO training.
Dutch radiologists, surgeons, surgical residents, interns, PhD students and physician assistants were asked to complete a survey and classify 20 tumours on MRI as 'below', 'on' or 'above' the STO. Outcomes were agreement with the expert reference, inter-rater variability and accuracy before and after the training.
Eighty-six collaborators participated. Six radiologists (32%) and 11 surgeons (73%) used the STO as the standard landmark to distinguish between rectal and sigmoidal tumours during multidisciplinary meetings. Overall agreement with the expert reference improved from 53% to 70% (p < 0.001) after the training. The positive predictive value for diagnosing rectal tumours was high before and after the training (92% vs. 90%); the negative predictive value for diagnosing sigmoidal tumours improved from 39% to 63%.
Approximately half of the represented hospitals have implemented the new definition of rectal cancer 1 year after the implementation of the Dutch national guidelines. Overall baseline agreement with the expert reference and accuracy for the tumours around the STO was low, but improved significantly after training. These results highlight the added value of training in implementation of radiological landmarks to ensure unambiguous assessment.
在国际德尔菲共识会议上,选择乙状结肠起飞点(STO)作为乙状结肠从骶骨向腹侧扫查的起始点来定义直肠,该定义已被纳入 2019 年 10 月以来的荷兰指南。本研究旨在评估该标志在指南实施 1 年后的实施情况,并对 STO 培训进行质量评估。
荷兰放射科医生、外科医生、外科住院医师、实习医生、博士生和医师助理被要求完成一项调查,并将 20 个 MRI 肿瘤分类为“低于”、“在”或“高于” STO。结果是与专家参考的一致性、在培训前后的组内变异性和准确性。
86 名合作者参与了研究。6 名放射科医生(32%)和 11 名外科医生(73%)在多学科会议上使用 STO 作为标准标志来区分直肠和乙状结肠肿瘤。培训后,与专家参考的总体一致性从 53%提高到 70%(p<0.001)。诊断直肠肿瘤的阳性预测值在培训前后均较高(92%比 90%);诊断乙状结肠肿瘤的阴性预测值从 39%提高到 63%。
在荷兰国家指南实施 1 年后,大约一半的代表医院实施了新的直肠癌定义。与专家参考的总体基线一致性和 STO 周围肿瘤的准确性较低,但培训后显著提高。这些结果强调了培训在实施放射学标志以确保明确评估方面的附加值。