Department of Surgery, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, De Boelelaan 1117, P.O. Box 7057, 1007 MB, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
Cancer Center Amsterdam, Treatment and Quality of Life, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Tech Coloproctol. 2023 Dec;27(12):1243-1250. doi: 10.1007/s10151-023-02803-4. Epub 2023 May 15.
The definition of rectal cancer based on the sigmoid take-off (STO) was incorporated into the Dutch guideline in 2019, and became mandatory in the national audit from December 2020. This study aimed to evaluate the use of the STO in clinical practice and the added value of online training, stratified for the period before (group A, historical cohort) and after (group B, current cohort) incorporation into the national audit.
Participants, including radiologists, surgeons, surgical and radiological residents, interns, PhD students, and physician assistants, were asked to complete an online training program, consisting of questionnaires, 20 MRI cases, and a training document. Outcomes were agreement with the expert reference, inter-rater variability, and accuracy before and after the training.
Group A consisted of 86 participants and group B consisted of 114 participants. Familiarity with the STO was higher in group B (76% vs 88%, p = 0.027). Its use in multidisciplinary meetings was not significantly higher (50% vs 67%, p = 0.237). Agreement with the expert reference was similar for both groups before (79% vs 80%, p = 0.423) and after the training (87% vs 87%, p = 0.848). Training resulted in significant improvement for both groups in classifying tumors located around the STO (group A, 69-79%; group B, 67-79%, p < 0.001).
The results of this study show that after the inclusion of the STO in the mandatory Dutch national audit, the STO was consequently used in only 67% of the represented hospitals. Online training has the potential to improve implementation and unambiguous assessment.
2019 年,基于乙状结肠起始部(STO)的直肠癌定义被纳入荷兰指南,并于 2020 年 12 月成为国家审计的强制性要求。本研究旨在评估 STO 在临床实践中的使用情况以及在线培训的附加值,并按纳入国家审计前后(A 组:历史队列;B 组:当前队列)进行分层。
参与者包括放射科医生、外科医生、外科和放射科住院医师、实习医生、博士研究生和医师助理,他们被要求完成一个在线培训项目,包括问卷、20 个 MRI 病例和一份培训文件。结果是培训前后与专家参考标准的一致性、评分者间的可变性和准确性。
A 组有 86 名参与者,B 组有 114 名参与者。B 组对 STO 的熟悉程度更高(76%对 88%,p=0.027)。在多学科会议中使用 STO 的比例并没有显著提高(50%对 67%,p=0.237)。两组培训前后与专家参考标准的一致性相似(培训前:79%对 80%,p=0.423;培训后:87%对 87%,p=0.848)。培训后,两组对 STO 周围肿瘤的分类能力均有显著提高(A 组:69%-79%;B 组:67%-79%,p<0.001)。
本研究结果表明,在 STO 被纳入荷兰强制性国家审计后,只有 67%的代表性医院使用了 STO。在线培训有可能提高实施和明确评估的效果。