The relative citation ratio and the h-index among academic ophthalmologists: A retrospective cross-sectional analysis.

BACKGROUND

Limited research has evaluated the relative citation ratio (RCR), a novel measure of research productivity. Accordingly, there remains a minimal understanding of its practical value relative to established metrics such as the h-index. Here, we examined correlations between the mean and weighted RCR scores and the h-index and explore the influence of academic rank, career duration, PhD acquisition, and fellowship training on these metrics.

METHODS

Data regarding the academic rank (e.g. assistant professor, associate professor, professor, or "other"), career duration, degrees, fellowship training, and research yield were collected for 1018 academic ophthalmologists practicing in the southern United States of America. The iCite and Scopus databases were utilized to quantify research yield via calculations of mean and weighted RCR, and h-index, respectively.

RESULTS

Significant correlations were observed between the h-index and the mean (ρ = 0.62,  < 0.001) and weighted RCR (ρ = 0.84,  < 0.001). Advanced academic rank was associated with increased indices values. In a subset of ophthalmologists excluding members of the "other" category, career duration was moderately correlated with h-index (ρ = 0.45,  < 0.001), and weakly correlated with mean (ρ = 0.14,  < 0.001) and weighted (ρ = 0.26,  < 0.001) RCR. PhD and fellowship acquisition were associated with increased research yield.

CONCLUSION

The findings suggest that the RCR is an effective measure of research yield, while resolving deficiencies present in the h-index. Further research remains to characterize the RCR's value relative to other established markers of research productivity.