• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

认知负荷和 ADHD 特质是否会影响对场景中社会信息的优先排序倾向?

Do cognitive load and ADHD traits affect the tendency to prioritise social information in scenes?

机构信息

Department of Psychology, University of Essex, Colchester, UK.

出版信息

Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2022 Oct;75(10):1904-1918. doi: 10.1177/17470218211066475. Epub 2022 Jan 4.

DOI:10.1177/17470218211066475
PMID:34844477
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9424720/
Abstract

We report two experiments investigating the effect of working memory (WM) load on selective attention. Experiment 1 was a modified version of Lavie et al. and confirmed that increasing memory load disrupted performance in the classic flanker task. Experiment 2 used the same manipulation of WM load to probe attention during the viewing of complex scenes while also investigating individual differences in attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) traits. In the image-viewing task, we measured the degree to which fixations targeted each of two crucial objects: (1) a social object (a person in the scene) and (2) a non-social object of higher or lower physical salience. We compared the extent to which increasing WM load would change the pattern of viewing of the physically salient and socially salient objects. If attending to the social item requires greater default voluntary top-down resources, then the viewing of social objects should show stronger modulation by WM load compared with viewing of physically salient objects. The results showed that the social object was fixated to a greater degree than the other object (regardless of physical salience). Increased salience drew fixations away from the background leading to slightly increased fixations on the non-social object, without changing fixations on the social object. Increased levels of ADHD-like traits were associated with fewer fixations on the social object, but only in the high-salient, low-load condition. Importantly, WM load did not affect the number of fixations on the social object. Such findings suggest rather surprisingly that attending to a social area in complex stimuli is not dependent on the availability of voluntary top-down resources.

摘要

我们报告了两项实验,旨在研究工作记忆(WM)负荷对选择性注意的影响。实验 1 是对 Lavie 等人实验的修改版,证实了增加记忆负荷会破坏经典侧抑制任务中的表现。实验 2 使用相同的 WM 负荷操作来探测在观看复杂场景时的注意力,同时也调查了注意力缺陷多动障碍(ADHD)特征的个体差异。在图像观看任务中,我们测量了注视两个关键物体的程度:(1)社会物体(场景中的人)和(2)较高或较低物理显著性的非社会物体。我们比较了增加 WM 负荷会如何改变对物理显著性和社会显著性物体的观看模式。如果关注社会项目需要更大的默认自愿自上而下的资源,那么与观看物理显著性物体相比,观看社会物体应该受到 WM 负荷的更强调节。结果表明,社会物体比其他物体(无论物理显著性如何)受到更多的注视。增加的显著性将注视吸引到背景之外,导致对非社会物体的注视略有增加,而对社会物体的注视不变。ADHD 样特质的水平升高与对社会物体的注视次数减少有关,但仅在高显著性、低负荷条件下。重要的是,WM 负荷不会影响对社会物体的注视次数。这些发现令人惊讶地表明,在复杂刺激中关注社会区域并不依赖于自愿自上而下资源的可用性。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0758/9424720/16cc1388d001/10.1177_17470218211066475-fig5.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0758/9424720/afe3253cafec/10.1177_17470218211066475-fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0758/9424720/d3a591cf9ba2/10.1177_17470218211066475-fig2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0758/9424720/c55d02fc9bbc/10.1177_17470218211066475-fig3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0758/9424720/b0ccbc044c67/10.1177_17470218211066475-fig4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0758/9424720/16cc1388d001/10.1177_17470218211066475-fig5.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0758/9424720/afe3253cafec/10.1177_17470218211066475-fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0758/9424720/d3a591cf9ba2/10.1177_17470218211066475-fig2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0758/9424720/c55d02fc9bbc/10.1177_17470218211066475-fig3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0758/9424720/b0ccbc044c67/10.1177_17470218211066475-fig4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0758/9424720/16cc1388d001/10.1177_17470218211066475-fig5.jpg

相似文献

1
Do cognitive load and ADHD traits affect the tendency to prioritise social information in scenes?认知负荷和 ADHD 特质是否会影响对场景中社会信息的优先排序倾向?
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2022 Oct;75(10):1904-1918. doi: 10.1177/17470218211066475. Epub 2022 Jan 4.
2
Overt attention in natural scenes: objects dominate features.自然场景中的显性注意力:物体主导特征。
Vision Res. 2015 Feb;107:36-48. doi: 10.1016/j.visres.2014.11.006. Epub 2014 Dec 3.
3
Objects are selected for attention based upon meaning during passive scene viewing.在被动观看场景时,人们会根据意义来选择注意的对象。
Psychon Bull Rev. 2023 Oct;30(5):1874-1886. doi: 10.3758/s13423-023-02286-2. Epub 2023 Apr 24.
4
Social prioritisation in scene viewing and the effects of a spatial memory load.场景观看中的社会优先排序和空间记忆负荷的影响。
Atten Percept Psychophys. 2024 May;86(4):1237-1247. doi: 10.3758/s13414-023-02769-3. Epub 2023 Aug 10.
5
Fixations on objects in natural scenes: dissociating importance from salience.对自然场景中物体的注视:将重要性与显著性区分开来。
Front Psychol. 2013 Jul 19;4:455. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2013.00455. eCollection 2013.
6
Attention in natural scenes: Affective-motivational factors guide gaze independently of visual salience.自然场景中的注意力:情感动机因素独立于视觉显著性引导注视。
Vision Res. 2017 Apr;133:161-175. doi: 10.1016/j.visres.2017.02.003. Epub 2017 Mar 14.
7
Priming of fixations during recognition of natural scenes.自然场景识别过程中注视的启动。
J Vis. 2013 Feb 25;13(3):3. doi: 10.1167/13.3.3.
8
Listen up! ADHD slows spoken-word processing in adverse listening conditions: Evidence from eye movements.听好了!注意力缺陷多动障碍(ADHD)在不利的听力条件下会减缓口语处理速度:来自眼动的证据。
Res Dev Disabil. 2023 Feb;133:104401. doi: 10.1016/j.ridd.2022.104401. Epub 2022 Dec 26.
9
How does the purpose of inspection influence the potency of visual salience in scene perception?检查目的如何影响场景感知中视觉显著性的效力?
Perception. 2007;36(8):1123-38. doi: 10.1068/p5659.
10
What stands out in a scene? A study of human explicit saliency judgment.场景中突出的是什么?一项关于人类显性显著性判断的研究。
Vision Res. 2013 Oct 18;91:62-77. doi: 10.1016/j.visres.2013.07.016. Epub 2013 Aug 15.

引用本文的文献

1
Cognitive load affects gaze dynamics during real-world tasks.认知负荷会影响现实任务中的注视动态。
Exp Brain Res. 2025 Mar 3;243(4):82. doi: 10.1007/s00221-025-07037-4.

本文引用的文献

1
Increased microsaccade rate in individuals with ADHD traits.具有注意力缺陷多动障碍(ADHD)特征的个体的微扫视速率增加。
J Eye Mov Res. 2017 Mar 4;10(1). doi: 10.16910/jemr.10.1.6.
2
Dichotomy, Trichotomy, or a Spectrum: Time to Reconsider Attentional Guidance Terminology.二分法、三分法还是一个连续体:是时候重新审视注意力引导术语了。
Front Psychol. 2020 Sep 30;11:2243. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.02243. eCollection 2020.
3
Effects of visual short-term memory load and attentional demand on the contrast response function.视觉短期记忆负荷和注意力需求对对比反应函数的影响。
J Vis. 2020 Oct 1;20(10):6. doi: 10.1167/jov.20.10.6.
4
Visual and verbal working memory loads interfere with scene-viewing.视觉和言语工作记忆负荷会干扰场景观看。
Atten Percept Psychophys. 2020 Aug;82(6):2814-2820. doi: 10.3758/s13414-020-02076-1.
5
Visual Selection: Usually Fast and Automatic; Seldom Slow and Volitional.视觉选择:通常快速且自动;很少缓慢且出于意志。
J Cogn. 2018 May 14;1(1):29. doi: 10.5334/joc.13.
6
Comment on Theeuwes's Characterization of Visual Selection.评特乌韦斯对视觉选择的刻画。
J Cogn. 2018 May 14;1(1):26. doi: 10.5334/joc.29.
7
Task instructions can accelerate the early preference for social features in naturalistic scenes.任务指令可以加速对自然场景中社交特征的早期偏好。
R Soc Open Sci. 2019 Mar 6;6(3):180596. doi: 10.1098/rsos.180596. eCollection 2019 Mar.
8
The Effect of Dual Task on Attentional Performance in Children With ADHD.双重任务对多动症儿童注意力表现的影响。
Front Integr Neurosci. 2019 Jan 17;12:67. doi: 10.3389/fnint.2018.00067. eCollection 2018.
9
Attentional Selection of Social Features Persists Despite Restricted Bottom-Up Information and Affects Temporal Viewing Dynamics.尽管受到限制的自下而上信息的影响,社会特征的注意力选择仍然存在,并影响时间观看动态。
Sci Rep. 2018 Aug 22;8(1):12555. doi: 10.1038/s41598-018-30736-8.
10
Scan patterns during scene viewing predict individual differences in clinical traits in a normative sample.在正常人群样本中,场景观看时的扫描模式可预测临床特征的个体差异。
PLoS One. 2018 May 23;13(5):e0196654. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0196654. eCollection 2018.