Gloc Dagmara, Nowak Zbigniew, Nowak-Lis Agata, Gabryś Tomasz, Szmatlan-Gabrys Urszula, Valach Peter, Pilis Anna
Silesian Center for Rehabilitation and Prevention, 43-450, Ustron, Poland.
Department of Physiotherapy, Jerzy Kukuczka Academy of Physical Education, 40-065, Katowice, Poland.
BMC Sports Sci Med Rehabil. 2021 Nov 29;13(1):151. doi: 10.1186/s13102-021-00379-w.
Standard endurance training used from the second stage of cardiac rehabilitation has many common features with indoor cycling training which is used in fitness clubs. In the study, an attempt was made to evaluate the usefulness of this form of training in a 24-day rehabilitation program for patients after myocardial infarction. The study examined a group of 64 patients (51.34 ± 8.02 years) who were divided into two groups: the IC group (32 patients aged 53.40 ± 4.31 years) with indoor cycling training instead of standard endurance training; and the ST group (32 patients aged 55.31 ± 6.45 years) performing standard training. The level of exercise tolerance (cardiopulmonary exercise testing on a treadmill-Bruce's protocol), hemodynamic indicators of the left ventricle (echocardiography) and blood lipid profile (laboratory test) were assessed.
In the IC group there was a significant increase in the test duration (9.21 ± 2.02 vs 11.24 ± 1.26 min; p < 0.001), the MET value (9.16 ± 1.30 vs 10.73 ± 1.23; p = 0.006) and VOmax (37.27 ± 3.23 vs 39.10 ± 3.17 ml/kg/min; p < 0.001). Parallel changes were observed in the ST group, where the following parameters improved: the test duration (9.41 ± 0.39 vs 10.91 ± 2.22; p < 0.001), MET value (8.65 ± 0.25 vs 9.86 ± 1.12; p = 0.002) and VOmax (36.89 ± 6.22 vs 38.76 ± 3.44; p < 0.001). No statistically significant changes were found in the hemodynamic indices of the left ventricle and the lipid profile. Also, the intergroup analysis did not show any statistical significance.
Based on the research results, it was found that indoor cycling training in the second phase of cardiac rehabilitation is a safe form of therapy and therefore may be an interesting alternative method to the classic bicycle ergometer exercise in the stage of early cardiac rehabilitation.
心脏康复第二阶段使用的标准耐力训练与健身俱乐部中使用的室内自行车训练有许多共同特征。在本研究中,尝试评估这种训练形式在心肌梗死患者24天康复计划中的有效性。该研究检查了一组64名患者(年龄51.34±8.02岁),他们被分为两组:IC组(32名患者,年龄53.40±4.31岁),采用室内自行车训练替代标准耐力训练;ST组(32名患者,年龄55.31±6.45岁),进行标准训练。评估了运动耐量水平(在跑步机上进行心肺运动测试——布鲁斯方案)、左心室血流动力学指标(超声心动图)和血脂谱(实验室检查)。
IC组的测试持续时间(9.21±2.02对11.24±1.26分钟;p<0.001)、代谢当量值(9.16±1.30对10.73±1.23;p=0.006)和最大摄氧量(37.27±3.23对39.10±3.17毫升/千克/分钟;p<0.001)有显著增加。ST组也观察到类似变化,以下参数得到改善:测试持续时间(9.41±0.39对10.91±2.22;p<0.001)、代谢当量值(8.65±0.25对9.86±1.12;p=0.002)和最大摄氧量(36.89±6.22对38.76±3.44;p<0.001)。左心室血流动力学指标和血脂谱未发现有统计学意义的变化。此外,组间分析未显示任何统计学意义。
基于研究结果,发现心脏康复第二阶段的室内自行车训练是一种安全的治疗形式,因此可能是早期心脏康复阶段经典自行车测力计运动的一种有趣替代方法。