Tolessa Amsalu, Louw Tobias M, Goosen Neill J
Department of Process Engineering, Stellenbosch University, Private Bag X1, Matieland 7602, Stellenbosch, South Africa; Bioenergy and Biochemical Research Division, FPIRTC, EEFRI, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia.
Department of Process Engineering, Stellenbosch University, Private Bag X1, Matieland 7602, Stellenbosch, South Africa.
Waste Manag. 2022 Feb 1;138:8-18. doi: 10.1016/j.wasman.2021.11.004. Epub 2021 Nov 27.
Anaerobic digestion (AD) technology holds numerous potential benefits for farmers, however, challenges persist in terms of implementation costs and sustainability in developing countries. This paper presents a probabilistic techno-economic assessment tool for AD. A clear distinction is made between direct financial feasibility and wider (socio) economic feasibility. The tool identifies the technical- and economic factors influencing the returns of a particular AD process as well as the sensitivity of model predictions to variations in the value of the identified factors using a Monte Carlo approach. The tool is applied to assess the feasibility of a smallholder farm-based AD installation under a variety of substrates and operating conditions as an illustrative case study, where on-going flows of costs and benefits were considered over a 15-year period and discounted at a rate of 8%. The results of the case study revealed that the installation of a 10 m smallholder farm-based anaerobic digester are likely to be financially and economically viable with a financial benefit-cost ratio of 1.30-1.38 and an economic benefit-cost ratio ranged from 5.49 to 6.01. Risk assessment results confirmed the strong economic feasibility of a smallholder farm-based AD implementation: under the most conservative cost estimates, there is a 73% probability of achieving a financial benefit-cost ratio > 1, while there is a 96.6% probability of achieving an economic benefit-cost ratio > 1. The case study demonstrated the utility of probabilistic techno-economic assessments for informed decision making, a tool which can be readily generalized to other settings.
厌氧消化(AD)技术对农民具有诸多潜在益处,然而,在发展中国家,实施成本和可持续性方面的挑战依然存在。本文介绍了一种用于厌氧消化的概率技术经济评估工具。明确区分了直接财务可行性和更广泛的(社会)经济可行性。该工具使用蒙特卡洛方法确定影响特定厌氧消化过程收益的技术和经济因素,以及模型预测对所确定因素值变化的敏感性。作为一个说明性案例研究,该工具被应用于评估在各种底物和运行条件下基于小农户农场的厌氧消化装置的可行性,其中在15年期间考虑了持续的成本和收益流,并以8%的贴现率进行贴现。案例研究结果表明,安装一个10立方米的基于小农户农场的厌氧消化池在财务和经济上可能是可行的,财务效益成本比为1.30 - 1.38,经济效益成本比在5.49至6.01之间。风险评估结果证实了基于小农户农场实施厌氧消化的强大经济可行性:在最保守的成本估计下,实现财务效益成本比>1的概率为73%,而实现经济效益成本比>1的概率为96.6%。案例研究证明了概率技术经济评估对明智决策的实用性,该工具可很容易地推广到其他情况。