MaREI Centre, Environmental Research Institute, University College Cork, Cork, Ireland.
Civil, Structural and Environmental Engineering, School of Engineering and Architecture, University College Cork, Cork, Ireland.
Bioengineered. 2023 Sep;14(1):2245991. doi: 10.1080/21655979.2023.2245991.
Marginal Abatement Cost Curves compare and assess greenhouse gas mitigation options available to various sectors of the economy. In the Irish agricultural sector, large anaerobic digestion facilities are currently considered a high-cost abatement solution. In prior studies of anaerobic digestion abatement costs, two options were assessed: the generation of heat and electricity from biogas (115 €/tCO) and the production of renewable heat from biomethane (280 €/tCO). Both scenarios encompass single cost values that may not capture the potentially variable nature of such systems. In contrast, prior techno-economic analyses and lifecycle analyses can provide a comparison of the abatement costs of anaerobic digestion systems at a range of scales. This work compares two case studies (based on prior literature) for small and medium-scale on farm anaerobic digestion systems. The small-scale system is set in Ireland with cattle slurry collected in open tanks during the winter, while the medium-scale system is set in the USA with cattle slurry collected periodically indoors all year-round. It was found that the abatement cost can vary between -117 to +79 € per t CO2. The key variables that affected the abatement cost were additional revenue streams such as biofertilizer sales, displaced energy savings, and additional incentives and emissions savings within the system boundary. Including only some of these options in the analysis resulted in higher abatement costs being reported. Based on the variation between system topologies and therefore system boundaries, assigning a single mitigation cost to anaerobic digestion systems may not be representative.
边际减排成本曲线用于比较和评估经济各部门现有的温室气体减排选项。在爱尔兰农业部门,大型厌氧消化设施目前被认为是一种高成本减排解决方案。在先前关于厌氧消化减排成本的研究中,评估了两种方案:沼气(115 欧元/吨二氧化碳)发电和生物质甲烷(280 欧元/吨二氧化碳)生产可再生热能。这两种方案都包含单一的成本值,可能无法捕捉到这些系统潜在的可变性质。相比之下,先前的技术经济分析和生命周期分析可以在一系列规模上比较厌氧消化系统的减排成本。这项工作比较了两个基于先前文献的小规模和中规模农场厌氧消化系统的案例研究。小规模系统位于爱尔兰,冬季在露天罐中收集牛粪浆,而中规模系统位于美国,全年定期在室内收集牛粪浆。结果发现,减排成本在-117 到+79 欧元/吨二氧化碳之间变化。影响减排成本的关键变量是额外的收入流,如生物肥料销售、能源节省的替代、系统边界内的额外激励措施和排放节省。在分析中只包括其中一些选项会导致报告的减排成本更高。基于系统拓扑结构(因此也包括系统边界)的变化,为厌氧消化系统分配单一的减排成本可能不具有代表性。