• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

支配他人,伤害自己:社会支配取向预示着新冠疫情期间的抑郁情绪。

Dominate others, hurt self: Social dominance orientation predicts depression during the COVID-19 pandemic.

作者信息

Shi Jiaxin, Chen Zhansheng, Wang Xijing, Teng Fei, Yang Ying, Chen Hao

机构信息

Department of Psychology, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong Special Administrative Region.

School of Psychology, South China Normal University, Guangzhou, China.

出版信息

Pers Individ Dif. 2021 Jun;175:110710. doi: 10.1016/j.paid.2021.110710. Epub 2021 Jan 31.

DOI:10.1016/j.paid.2021.110710
PMID:34848904
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8613708/
Abstract

The ongoing coronavirus pandemic threatens physical and psychological health. We examined whether social dominance orientation (SDO), a preference for inequality among social groups, contributes to mental health during the pandemic. In particular, we predicted that people high in SDO would experience higher levels of depression than others low in SDO. Our results ( = 2008) showed that SDO was positively associated with depression. In addition, participants' perceived lifestyle changes moderated the association between SDO and depression. We also discuss the theoretical and practical implications of the current work.

摘要

持续的冠状病毒大流行威胁着身心健康。我们研究了社会支配取向(SDO),即对社会群体间不平等的偏好,是否会在大流行期间影响心理健康。具体而言,我们预测,社会支配取向得分高的人比得分低的人会经历更严重的抑郁。我们的研究结果(样本量 = 2008)表明,社会支配取向与抑郁呈正相关。此外,参与者感知到的生活方式变化调节了社会支配取向与抑郁之间的关联。我们还讨论了当前研究工作的理论和实践意义。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ee07/8613708/e182a6f18e96/gr1_lrg.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ee07/8613708/e182a6f18e96/gr1_lrg.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ee07/8613708/e182a6f18e96/gr1_lrg.jpg

相似文献

1
Dominate others, hurt self: Social dominance orientation predicts depression during the COVID-19 pandemic.支配他人,伤害自己:社会支配取向预示着新冠疫情期间的抑郁情绪。
Pers Individ Dif. 2021 Jun;175:110710. doi: 10.1016/j.paid.2021.110710. Epub 2021 Jan 31.
2
Social dominance orientation: revisiting the structure and function of a variable predicting social and political attitudes.社会支配倾向:重新审视预测社会和政治态度的变量的结构和功能。
Pers Soc Psychol Bull. 2012 May;38(5):583-606. doi: 10.1177/0146167211432765. Epub 2012 Jan 3.
3
Correlations between social dominance orientation and political attitudes reflect common genetic underpinnings.社会支配倾向与政治态度之间的相关性反映了共同的遗传基础。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2019 Sep 3;116(36):17741-17746. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1818711116. Epub 2019 Aug 20.
4
The nature of social dominance orientation: Theorizing and measuring preferences for intergroup inequality using the new SDO₇ scale.社会支配取向的本质:使用新的SDO₇量表对群体间不平等偏好进行理论化和测量。
J Pers Soc Psychol. 2015 Dec;109(6):1003-28. doi: 10.1037/pspi0000033. Epub 2015 Oct 19.
5
Associations of parental and peer characteristics with adolescents' social dominance orientation.父母和同伴特征与青少年社会支配倾向的关系。
J Youth Adolesc. 2011 Jun;40(6):694-706. doi: 10.1007/s10964-010-9585-7. Epub 2010 Sep 5.
6
Social dominance orientation moderates the effectiveness of mindset messages.社会支配倾向调节心态信息的有效性。
Br J Soc Psychol. 2018 Apr;57(2):448-460. doi: 10.1111/bjso.12238. Epub 2018 Jan 22.
7
Environmental consequences of the desire to dominate and be superior.对主宰和优越的渴望所带来的环境后果。
Pers Soc Psychol Bull. 2013 Sep;39(9):1127-38. doi: 10.1177/0146167213490805. Epub 2013 Jun 24.
8
Power Moderates the Effects of Social Dominance Orientation on Punishment: An Experimental Analysis.权力调节社会支配取向对惩罚的影响:一项实验分析。
Psychol Rep. 2019 Feb;122(1):201-218. doi: 10.1177/0033294118755095. Epub 2018 Jan 30.
9
A critical examination and meta-analysis of the distinction between the dominance and antiegalitarianism facets of social dominance orientation.对社会支配取向的支配性与反平等主义层面之间差异的批判性审视与元分析。
J Pers Soc Psychol. 2023 Feb;124(2):413-436. doi: 10.1037/pspp0000432. Epub 2022 Aug 18.
10
Social Dominance Orientation Relates to Believing Men Should Dominate Sexually, Sexual Self-Efficacy, and Taking Free Female Condoms Among Undergraduate Women and Men.社会支配取向与认为男性应在性方面占据主导地位、性自我效能以及本科男女中领取免费女用避孕套的情况相关。
Sex Roles. 2012 Dec;67(11-12):659-669. doi: 10.1007/s11199-012-0207-6.

引用本文的文献

1
Correlation of higher right-wing authoritarianism and lower social dominance orientation with greater subjective well-being in China.在中国,右翼权威主义和较低的社会支配倾向与更高的主观幸福感相关。
BMC Psychol. 2024 Nov 14;12(1):658. doi: 10.1186/s40359-024-02084-y.
2
How Fear of COVID-19 Affects Service Experience and Recommendation Intention in Theme Parks: An Approach of Integrating Protection Motivation Theory and Experience Economy Theory.新冠恐惧如何影响主题公园的服务体验与推荐意愿:整合保护动机理论与体验经济理论的方法
Front Psychol. 2022 Feb 28;13:809520. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.809520. eCollection 2022.
3

本文引用的文献

1
A qualitative exploration of the shift work experience: the perceived effect on eating habits, lifestyle behaviours and psychosocial wellbeing.一项关于轮班工作体验的定性探索:感知对饮食习惯、生活方式行为和心理社会健康的影响。
J Public Health (Oxf). 2018 Dec 1;40(4):e482-e492. doi: 10.1093/pubmed/fdy047.
2
The relationship between materialism and personal well-being: A meta-analysis.物质主义与个人幸福之间的关系:一项元分析。
J Pers Soc Psychol. 2014 Nov;107(5):879-924. doi: 10.1037/a0037409.
3
The relationship between right-wing ideological attitudes and psychological well-being.
The Association between COVID-19-Related Wellbeing with Materialism and Perceived Threat.
与新冠疫情相关的幸福感与物质主义和感知威胁的关系。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Jan 14;19(2):912. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19020912.
4
Psychosomatic Symptoms and Neuroticism following COVID-19: The Role of Online Aggression toward a Stigmatized Group.新冠疫情后的身心症状与神经质:针对一个受污名化群体的网络攻击的作用。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Aug 17;18(16):8672. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18168672.
右翼思想态度与心理健康之间的关系。
Pers Soc Psychol Bull. 2013 Apr;39(4):509-22. doi: 10.1177/0146167213478199. Epub 2013 Feb 22.
4
Collective narcissism and its social consequences.集体自恋及其社会后果。
J Pers Soc Psychol. 2009 Dec;97(6):1074-96. doi: 10.1037/a0016904.
5
To whom does voice in groups matter? Effects of voice on affect and procedural fairness judgments as a function of social dominance orientation.
J Soc Psychol. 2008 Feb;148(1):61-76. doi: 10.3200/SOCP.148.1.61-76.
6
Spending money on others promotes happiness.把钱花在别人身上能增进幸福感。
Science. 2008 Mar 21;319(5870):1687-8. doi: 10.1126/science.1150952.
7
Interpersonal disgust, ideological orientations, and dehumanization as predictors of intergroup attitudes.人际厌恶、意识形态取向和去人性化作为群体间态度的预测因素。
Psychol Sci. 2007 Aug;18(8):691-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9280.2007.01962.x.
8
Does social dominance generate prejudice? Integrating individual and contextual determinants of intergroup cognitions.社会支配会引发偏见吗?整合群体间认知的个体和情境决定因素。
J Pers Soc Psychol. 2003 Apr;84(4):697-721. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.84.4.697.
9
The PHQ-9: validity of a brief depression severity measure.PHQ-9:一种简短抑郁严重程度测量工具的效度
J Gen Intern Med. 2001 Sep;16(9):606-13. doi: 10.1046/j.1525-1497.2001.016009606.x.
10
Relationship of subjective and objective social status with psychological and physiological functioning: preliminary data in healthy white women.主观和客观社会地位与心理和生理功能的关系:健康白人女性的初步数据
Health Psychol. 2000 Nov;19(6):586-92. doi: 10.1037//0278-6133.19.6.586.