• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

对主宰和优越的渴望所带来的环境后果。

Environmental consequences of the desire to dominate and be superior.

机构信息

Victoria University of Wellington, New Zealand.

出版信息

Pers Soc Psychol Bull. 2013 Sep;39(9):1127-38. doi: 10.1177/0146167213490805. Epub 2013 Jun 24.

DOI:10.1177/0146167213490805
PMID:23798371
Abstract

A belief in human dominance over nature lies at the heart of current environmental problems. In this article, we extend the theoretical scope of social dominance theory by arguing that social dominance orientation (SDO) is an important variable in understanding person-environment relations. We argue that individuals high in SDO are more willing to exploit the environment in unsustainable ways because SDO promotes human hierarchical dominance over nature. Four studies provide support for this perspective. High SDO was associated with lower levels of environmental concern in a nationally representative New Zealand sample (Study 1) and in country-level data across 27 nations (Study 2). SDO was also positively related to utilization attitudes toward nature (Study 3) and mediated the gender difference in beliefs about anthropogenic climate change (Study 4), and both occurred independently of right-wing authoritarianism. Implications for the human-dominated view of nature subscribed to by those high in SDO are discussed.

摘要

人类对自然的支配地位的信念是当前环境问题的核心。在本文中,我们通过论证社会支配倾向(SDO)是理解人与环境关系的一个重要变量,扩展了社会支配理论的理论范围。我们认为,SDO 水平高的人更愿意以不可持续的方式开发环境,因为 SDO 促进了人类对自然的等级统治。四项研究为这一观点提供了支持。在一项具有全国代表性的新西兰样本(研究 1)和 27 个国家的国家层面数据(研究 2)中,SDO 与较低的环境关注水平相关。SDO 还与对自然的利用态度呈正相关(研究 3),并在性别差异方面对人为气候变化的信念产生中介作用(研究 4),而且这些作用都独立于右翼独裁主义。本文讨论了那些 SDO 水平高的人所赞同的以人类为主导的自然观的含义。

相似文献

1
Environmental consequences of the desire to dominate and be superior.对主宰和优越的渴望所带来的环境后果。
Pers Soc Psychol Bull. 2013 Sep;39(9):1127-38. doi: 10.1177/0146167213490805. Epub 2013 Jun 24.
2
The influence of social dominance orientation and right-wing authoritarianism on environmentalism: A five-year cross-lagged analysis.社会支配倾向和右翼威权主义对环境主义的影响:一项为期五年的交叉滞后分析。
PLoS One. 2019 Jul 10;14(7):e0219067. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0219067. eCollection 2019.
3
The motivational bases of right-wing authoritarianism and social dominance orientation: relations to values and attitudes in the aftermath of September 11, 2001.右翼威权主义和社会支配取向的动机基础:与2001年9月11日事件后价值观和态度的关系
Pers Soc Psychol Bull. 2005 Oct;31(10):1425-34. doi: 10.1177/0146167205275614.
4
Mechanisms of moral disengagement and their differential use by right-wing authoritarianism and social dominance orientation in support of war.支持战争的右翼威权主义和社会支配倾向在道德解脱机制及其差异使用上的机制。
Aggress Behav. 2010 Jul-Aug;36(4):238-50. doi: 10.1002/ab.20344.
5
How a terror attack affects right-wing authoritarianism, social dominance orientation, and their relationship to torture attitudes.恐怖袭击如何影响右翼威权主义、社会支配取向及其与酷刑态度的关系。
Scand J Psychol. 2018 Oct;59(5):547-552. doi: 10.1111/sjop.12463. Epub 2018 Jun 29.
6
Authoritarian dynamics and unethical decision making: high social dominance orientation leaders and high right-wing authoritarianism followers.威权动态与不道德决策:高社会支配取向领导者与高右翼威权主义追随者
J Pers Soc Psychol. 2007 Jan;92(1):67-81. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.92.1.67.
7
Group differences in the legitimization of inequality: Questioning the role of social dominance orientation.不平等合法化中的群体差异:质疑社会支配取向的作用。
Br J Soc Psychol. 2017 Mar;56(1):28-46. doi: 10.1111/bjso.12167. Epub 2016 Oct 20.
8
Social dominance orientation moderates the effectiveness of mindset messages.社会支配倾向调节心态信息的有效性。
Br J Soc Psychol. 2018 Apr;57(2):448-460. doi: 10.1111/bjso.12238. Epub 2018 Jan 22.
9
Endorsement of sexist ideology in Taiwan and the United States: social dominance orientation, right-wing authoritarianism, and deferential family norms.台湾和美国对性别歧视意识形态的认可:社会支配取向、右翼独裁主义和恭敬的家庭规范。
Int J Psychol. 2013;48(3):254-62. doi: 10.1080/00207594.2011.645485. Epub 2012 Mar 1.
10
Differential effects of right wing authoritarianism and social dominance orientation on outgroup attitudes and their mediation by threat from and competitiveness to outgroups.右翼威权主义和社会支配取向对外群体态度的差异影响及其通过来自外群体的威胁和与外群体的竞争所起的中介作用。
Pers Soc Psychol Bull. 2006 May;32(5):684-96. doi: 10.1177/0146167205284282.

引用本文的文献

1
Climate change profiles of New Zealanders over time: a one-year latent transition analysis of climate change beliefs and concern.新西兰人随时间变化的气候变化概况:气候变化信念与担忧的一年期潜在转变分析
J R Soc N Z. 2023 Dec 17;54(4):395-411. doi: 10.1080/03036758.2023.2272842. eCollection 2024.
2
Recycling and consumption reduction following the COVID-19 lockdown: The effect of threat and coping appraisal, past behavior and information.新冠疫情封锁后的回收利用与消费减少:威胁与应对评估、过往行为及信息的影响
Resour Conserv Recycl. 2021 Apr;167:105370. doi: 10.1016/j.resconrec.2020.105370. Epub 2021 Jan 7.
3
Relationships between Spirituality, Religious Fundamentalism and Environmentalism: The Mediating Role of Right-Wing Authoritarianism.
宗教信仰、宗教原教旨主义与环境主义之间的关系:右翼权威主义的中介作用。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Oct 14;19(20):13242. doi: 10.3390/ijerph192013242.
4
Minority Influence and Degrowth-Oriented Pro-environmental Conflict: When Emotions Betray Our Attachment to the Social Dominant Paradigm.少数群体影响与以去增长为导向的亲环境冲突:当情感背叛我们对社会主导范式的依恋时。
Front Psychol. 2022 Jun 29;13:899933. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.899933. eCollection 2022.
5
The Impact of an Authoritarian Personality on Pro-Environmental Behaviour for Air Pollution Mitigation through Interactions with Social Norms.权威人格对缓解空气污染的亲环境行为的影响——通过与社会规范的相互作用。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Sep 3;18(17):9301. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18179301.
6
Public support for restoration: Does including ecosystem services as a goal engage a different set of values and attitudes than biodiversity protection alone?公众对修复的支持:将生态系统服务纳入目标是否比仅保护生物多样性更能引起人们对不同价值观和态度的关注?
PLoS One. 2021 Jan 19;16(1):e0245074. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0245074. eCollection 2021.
7
Cultural Variation in the Development of Beliefs About Conservation.文化差异对保护观念发展的影响。
Cogn Sci. 2020 Oct;44(10):e12909. doi: 10.1111/cogs.12909.
8
Golden Age of Medicine 2.0: Lifestyle Medicine and Planetary Health Prioritized.医学2.0的黄金时代:重视生活方式医学与地球健康
J Lifestyle Med. 2019 Jul;9(2):75-91. doi: 10.15280/jlm.2019.9.2.75. Epub 2019 Jul 31.
9
The influence of social dominance orientation and right-wing authoritarianism on environmentalism: A five-year cross-lagged analysis.社会支配倾向和右翼威权主义对环境主义的影响:一项为期五年的交叉滞后分析。
PLoS One. 2019 Jul 10;14(7):e0219067. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0219067. eCollection 2019.
10
Preventive Medicine for Person, Place, and Planet: Revisiting the Concept of High-Level Wellness in the Planetary Health Paradigm.人、地、星球的预防医学:在行星健康范式中重新审视高水平健康的概念。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2019 Jan 16;16(2):238. doi: 10.3390/ijerph16020238.