Henao-Kaffure Liliana, Peñaloza Gonzalo
Grupo de Estudios Sociohistóricos de la Salud y la Protección Social, Universidad Nacional de Colombia, Bogotá, Colombia.
Centro de Investigación y de Estudios Avanzados del IPN, Unidad Monterrey, Monterrey, México.
Cult Stud Sci Educ. 2021;16(4):1029-1045. doi: 10.1007/s11422-021-10074-4. Epub 2021 Nov 26.
This academic position paper focuses on building a bridge between public health and science education in order to recognize the relationships between science and society-politics, economics, and ideology-in a pandemic context. To do this, we first present the contemporary dispute between the ways of understanding and explaining public health problems in light of a historical-territorial critical perspective; then, we show the configuration process of the formal and hegemonic concept of pandemic that has taken place over the period of the pandemics of the 1918 flu and the 2019 coronavirus disease; later, we give way to a historical-territorial understanding of the genesis of the 2002 and 2012 epidemics in relation to the coronavirus in the twenty-first century; and lastly, we indicate the key points from the historical-territorial critical perspective of public health that science education can use in order to contribute to a critical and reflective understanding of epidemics and pandemics. In this framework, "configuration process" is a category we propose and use in order to explain that specific events such as epidemics and pandemics are interwoven in a social, historical-territorial, trajectory of world power relations.
本学术立场文件着重于在公共卫生与科学教育之间搭建一座桥梁,以便在大流行背景下认识科学与社会政治、经济和意识形态之间的关系。为此,我们首先从历史地域批判视角阐述理解和解释公共卫生问题方式上的当代争议;接着,我们展示在1918年流感大流行和2019年冠状病毒病大流行期间发生的大流行这一正式且占主导地位概念的形成过程;随后,我们对21世纪与冠状病毒相关的2002年和2012年疫情起源进行历史地域解读;最后,我们指出科学教育可从公共卫生的历史地域批判视角借鉴的关键点,以促进对疫情和大流行的批判性和反思性理解。在此框架下,“形成过程”是我们提出并用以解释诸如疫情和大流行等特定事件如何在社会、历史地域、世界权力关系轨迹中交织的一个范畴。