• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

价值、透明度与包容性:基于价值观的肌骨研究中患者参与度研究

Value, transparency, and inclusion: A values-based study of patient involvement in musculoskeletal research.

机构信息

University of Bristol and University Hospitals Bristol and Weston NHS Foundation Trust, Bristol, United Kingdom.

Musculoskeletal Research Unit, Translational Health Sciences, Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Bristol, United Kingdom.

出版信息

PLoS One. 2021 Dec 1;16(12):e0260617. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0260617. eCollection 2021.

DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0260617
PMID:34852018
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8635367/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Patient and public involvement work (PPI) is essential to good research practice. Existing research indicates that PPI offers benefits to research design, conduct, communication, and implementation of findings. Understanding how PPI works and its value helps to provide information about best practice and highlight areas for further development. This study used a values-based approach to reporting PPI at a Research Unit focused on musculoskeletal conditions within a UK medical school.

METHODS

The study was conducted between October 2019 and January 2020 using Gradinger's value system framework as a theoretical basis. The framework comprises three value systems each containing five clusters. All PPI members and researchers who had attended PPI groups were invited to participate. Participants completed a structured questionnaire based on the value system framework; PPI members also provided further information through telephone interviews. Data were deductively analysed using a framework approach with data mapped onto value systems.

RESULTS

Twelve PPI members and 17 researchers took part. Views about PPI activity mapped onto all three value systems. PPI members felt empowered to provide their views, and that their opinions were valued by researchers. It was important to PPI members that they were able to 'give back' and to do something positive with their experiences. Researchers would have liked the groups to be more representative of the wider population, patients highlighted that groups could include more younger members. Researchers recognised the value of PPI, and the study highlighted areas where researchers members might benefit from further awareness.

CONCLUSIONS

Three areas for development were identified: (i) facilitating researcher engagement in training about the value and importance of PPI in research; (ii) support for researchers to reflect on the role that PPI plays in transparency of healthcare research; (iii) work to further explore and address aspects of diversity and inclusion in PPI.

摘要

背景

患者和公众参与工作(PPI)是良好研究实践的基础。现有研究表明,PPI 为研究设计、进行、交流和研究结果的实施带来了益处。了解 PPI 如何发挥作用及其价值有助于提供有关最佳实践的信息,并突出进一步发展的领域。本研究采用基于价值观的方法,在英国一所医学院专注于肌肉骨骼疾病的研究单位报告 PPI。

方法

该研究于 2019 年 10 月至 2020 年 1 月进行,使用 Gradinger 的价值体系框架作为理论基础。该框架包含三个价值体系,每个体系包含五个聚类。邀请所有 PPI 成员和参加过 PPI 小组的研究人员参与。参与者根据价值体系框架完成了一份结构化问卷;PPI 成员还通过电话访谈提供了更多信息。使用框架方法对数据进行演绎分析,将数据映射到价值体系上。

结果

12 名 PPI 成员和 17 名研究人员参与了研究。关于 PPI 活动的观点映射到了所有三个价值体系。PPI 成员感到有能力表达自己的观点,并且他们的意见受到研究人员的重视。对 PPI 成员来说,重要的是他们能够“回馈”并利用他们的经验做一些积极的事情。研究人员希望小组能更能代表更广泛的人群,患者强调小组可以包括更多的年轻成员。研究人员认识到 PPI 的价值,该研究强调了研究人员成员可能需要进一步提高认识的领域。

结论

确定了三个发展领域:(i)促进研究人员参与有关 PPI 在研究中的价值和重要性的培训;(ii)支持研究人员反思 PPI 在医疗保健研究透明度方面所起的作用;(iii)努力进一步探索和解决 PPI 中的多样性和包容性方面的问题。

相似文献

1
Value, transparency, and inclusion: A values-based study of patient involvement in musculoskeletal research.价值、透明度与包容性:基于价值观的肌骨研究中患者参与度研究
PLoS One. 2021 Dec 1;16(12):e0260617. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0260617. eCollection 2021.
2
Taking patient and public involvement online: qualitative evaluation of an online forum for palliative care and rehabilitation research.线上开展患者及公众参与:姑息治疗与康复研究在线论坛的质性评估
Res Involv Engagem. 2018 May 1;4:14. doi: 10.1186/s40900-018-0097-z. eCollection 2018.
3
Combining PPI with qualitative research to engage 'harder-to-reach' populations: service user groups as co-applicants on a platform study for a trial.将质子泵抑制剂(PPI)与定性研究相结合以接触“更难接触到”的人群:服务用户群体作为平台研究试验的共同申请人
Res Involv Engagem. 2016 Mar 24;2:7. doi: 10.1186/s40900-016-0023-1. eCollection 2016.
4
The extent, quality and impact of patient and public involvement in primary care research: a mixed methods study.患者及公众参与基层医疗研究的程度、质量及影响:一项混合方法研究
Res Involv Engagem. 2018 May 24;4:16. doi: 10.1186/s40900-018-0100-8. eCollection 2018.
5
Patient and public involvement (PPI) in UK surgical trials: a survey and focus groups with stakeholders to identify practices, views, and experiences.英国外科试验中的患者及公众参与(PPI):一项针对利益相关者的调查及焦点小组讨论,以确定实践情况、观点和经验。
Trials. 2019 Feb 11;20(1):119. doi: 10.1186/s13063-019-3183-0.
6
Reporting and appraising the context, process and impact of PPI on contributors, researchers and the trial during a randomised controlled trial - the 3D study.在一项随机对照试验(3D研究)中报告和评估患者及公众参与(PPI)对参与者、研究人员和试验的背景、过程及影响
Res Involv Engagem. 2018 May 14;4:15. doi: 10.1186/s40900-018-0098-y. eCollection 2018.
7
Reciprocal relationships and the importance of feedback in patient and public involvement: A mixed methods study.患者和公众参与中的互惠关系和反馈的重要性:一项混合方法研究。
Health Expect. 2018 Oct;21(5):899-908. doi: 10.1111/hex.12684. Epub 2018 Apr 14.
8
Patient and public involvement in research: the need for budgeting PPI staff costs in funding applications.患者及公众参与研究:在资助申请中为患者及公众参与(PPI)工作人员成本编制预算的必要性。
Res Involv Engagem. 2023 Mar 25;9(1):16. doi: 10.1186/s40900-023-00424-7.
9
Evaluation of a national training programme to support engagement in mental health services: Learning enablers and learning gains.评估一个支持参与心理健康服务的国家培训计划:学习促进因素和学习收益。
J Psychiatr Ment Health Nurs. 2019 Nov;26(9-10):323-336. doi: 10.1111/jpm.12535. Epub 2019 Oct 7.
10
Involving the public in mental health and learning disability research: Can we, should we, do we?让公众参与心理健康和学习障碍研究:我们能吗?我们应该吗?我们做到了吗?
J Psychiatr Ment Health Nurs. 2017 Oct;24(8):570-579. doi: 10.1111/jpm.12404. Epub 2017 Jul 19.

引用本文的文献

1
PPI-POWER-Planning our work with equity and respect: A case study of PPI working.PPI-助力-以公平和尊重规划我们的工作:PPI工作的一个案例研究
Res Involv Engagem. 2025 May 30;11(1):58. doi: 10.1186/s40900-025-00723-1.
2
Embedding patient and public involvement into a doctoral study: developing a point-of-care HIV testing intervention for dental settings.将患者和公众参与纳入博士研究:为牙科诊所开发即时护理艾滋病毒检测干预措施。
Front Oral Health. 2024 May 15;5:1359132. doi: 10.3389/froh.2024.1359132. eCollection 2024.
3
The role of Patient and public involvement (PPI) in pre-clinical spinal cord research: An interview study.患者和公众参与(PPI)在临床前脊髓研究中的作用:一项访谈研究。
PLoS One. 2024 Apr 29;19(4):e0301626. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0301626. eCollection 2024.
4
Reflections on contributing to health research: A qualitative interview study with research participants and patient advisors.对参与健康研究的思考:一项对研究参与者和患者顾问的定性访谈研究。
PLoS One. 2022 Dec 19;17(12):e0279354. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0279354. eCollection 2022.
5
Research priorities for intra-articular corticosteroid injections for osteoarthritis: A Delphi study.骨关节炎关节内注射皮质类固醇的研究重点:一项德尔菲研究。
Osteoarthr Cartil Open. 2022 Sep;4(3):100291. doi: 10.1016/j.ocarto.2022.100291.

本文引用的文献

1
Conceptualising Surgical Innovation: An Eliminativist Proposal.概念化手术创新:消除主义提案。
Health Care Anal. 2020 Mar;28(1):73-97. doi: 10.1007/s10728-019-00380-y.
2
Involving people and patients in health care, health policy and research - across the board.让各类人群和患者全面参与到医疗保健、卫生政策及研究当中。
Health Expect. 2019 Jun;22(3):273-274. doi: 10.1111/hex.12922.
3
The role of patients and carers in diffusing a health-care innovation: A case study of "My Medication Passport".患者及护理人员在推广医疗创新中的作用:以“我的药物护照”为例的案例研究
Health Expect. 2019 Aug;22(4):676-687. doi: 10.1111/hex.12893. Epub 2019 May 26.
4
'We're passengers sailing in the same ship, but we have our own berths to sleep in': Evaluating patient and public involvement within a regional research programme: An action research project informed by Normalisation Process Theory.“我们是同乘一艘船的乘客,但我们有自己的卧铺睡觉”:在区域研究计划中评估患者和公众的参与:一项受正常化进程理论启发的行动研究项目。
PLoS One. 2019 May 14;14(5):e0215953. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0215953. eCollection 2019.
5
Facilitating public and patient involvement in basic and preclinical health research.促进公众和患者参与基础和临床前卫生研究。
PLoS One. 2019 May 14;14(5):e0216600. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0216600. eCollection 2019.
6
Frameworks for supporting patient and public involvement in research: Systematic review and co-design pilot.支持患者和公众参与研究的框架:系统评价与协同设计试点
Health Expect. 2019 Aug;22(4):785-801. doi: 10.1111/hex.12888. Epub 2019 Apr 22.
7
Patient involvement in clinical trials: motivation and expectations differ between patients and researchers involved in a trial on urinary tract infections.患者参与临床试验:参与尿路感染试验的患者与研究人员的动机和期望存在差异。
Res Involv Engagem. 2019 Apr 1;5:15. doi: 10.1186/s40900-019-0145-3. eCollection 2019.
8
The changing regulatory landscape for biomedical implants and its relationship to withdrawal of some vaginal mesh products.生物医学植入物不断变化的监管环境及其与一些阴道网片产品撤市的关系。
Curr Opin Urol. 2019 Jul;29(4):414-418. doi: 10.1097/MOU.0000000000000622.
9
"About sixty per cent I want to do it": Health researchers' attitudes to, and experiences of, patient and public involvement (PPI)-A qualitative interview study.“约60%的人表示愿意参与”:健康领域研究人员对患者及公众参与(PPI)的态度与经历——一项定性访谈研究
Health Expect. 2019 Aug;22(4):721-730. doi: 10.1111/hex.12883. Epub 2019 Mar 29.
10
Impact of patient and public involvement on enrolment and retention in clinical trials: systematic review and meta-analysis.患者和公众参与对临床试验入组和保留的影响:系统评价和荟萃分析。
BMJ. 2018 Nov 28;363:k4738. doi: 10.1136/bmj.k4738.