Suppr超能文献

PPI-助力-以公平和尊重规划我们的工作:PPI工作的一个案例研究

PPI-POWER-Planning our work with equity and respect: A case study of PPI working.

作者信息

Martin Anne-Marie, Twomey Kayleigh, Doyle-Kent Mary, Woods Lorraine, Murphy Joanne

机构信息

School of Nursing and Midwifery, Brookfield Health Sciences Complex, University College Cork, Cork, Ireland.

Graduate, University College Cork, Cork, Ireland.

出版信息

Res Involv Engagem. 2025 May 30;11(1):58. doi: 10.1186/s40900-025-00723-1.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Patient and Public Involvement (PPI) is increasingly advocated for undertaking research that is useful and relevant to those impacted by it. Funding bodies now include PPI as a mandatory part of funding programmes. Although researchers may be open to PPI research, the practicalities of this approach can be unclear. Therefore, we describe how we worked together to identify research priorities on a project called PPI-POWER (Patient and Public Involvement-Planning Our Work with Equity and Respect).

METHODS

Our team comprises a person with intellectual disability, two parents of people with intellectual disability, a research officer and a researcher. We used a diary study approach to document the strategies we used to ensure everyone was heard and involved, building our partnership, successes, challenges, practicalities. We met approximately every six weeks. At the end of each meeting we talked about how we found preparing for and being part of that meeting.

RESULTS

We use the PPI Ignite Network Values and Principles (2022) as a framework to present our experiences. Clear, open communication, transparency around expectations as well as flexibility, respect and understanding regarding responsibilities beyond the research were important issues that were necessary for successful working.

CONCLUSIONS

Careful, considerate teamworking supports the development of PPI partnerships that will be invaluable and impactful. Although our work relates to people with intellectual disability and their carers, the strategies we used can apply across different groups. Further, we make a number of recommendations that support respectful, collaborative working for those planning PPI research.

摘要

背景

患者及公众参与(PPI)越来越多地被提倡用于开展对受其影响的人群有用且相关的研究。资助机构现在将患者及公众参与作为资助项目的一个强制性部分。尽管研究人员可能对患者及公众参与研究持开放态度,但这种方法的实际操作可能并不明确。因此,我们描述了我们如何共同努力,在一个名为PPI-POWER(患者及公众参与——以公平和尊重规划我们的工作)的项目中确定研究重点。

方法

我们的团队由一名智障人士、两名智障人士的父母、一名研究官员和一名研究人员组成。我们采用日记研究方法来记录我们为确保每个人的意见都能被听取和参与所使用的策略,建立我们的伙伴关系、成功经验以及挑战和实际情况。我们大约每六周会面一次。每次会议结束时,我们都会谈论我们对为那次会议做准备以及参与会议的感受。

结果

我们以患者及公众参与激发网络价值观和原则(2022年)为框架来呈现我们的经验。清晰、开放的沟通、期望的透明度以及对研究之外责任的灵活性、尊重和理解是成功合作所需的重要问题。

结论

谨慎、体贴的团队合作有助于发展患者及公众参与伙伴关系,这种伙伴关系将非常宝贵且具有影响力。尽管我们的工作涉及智障人士及其照顾者,但我们使用的策略可以应用于不同群体。此外,我们提出了一些建议,以支持那些规划患者及公众参与研究的人员进行尊重、协作的工作。

相似文献

本文引用的文献

3
Overcoming the disconnect between scientific research and the public.克服科学研究与公众之间的脱节。
Immunol Cell Biol. 2023 Aug;101(7):590-597. doi: 10.1111/imcb.12657. Epub 2023 May 25.

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验