Stilwell Peter, Hudon Anne, Meldrum Keith, Pagé M Gabrielle, Wideman Timothy H
School of Physical and Occupational Therapy, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada; Centre for Interdisciplinary Research in Rehabilitation of Greater Montreal (CRIR), IURDPM, CIUSSS-Centre-Sud-de-l'Ile-de-Montréal, Montreal, Quebec, Canada.
Centre for Interdisciplinary Research in Rehabilitation of Greater Montreal (CRIR), IURDPM, CIUSSS-Centre-Sud-de-l'Ile-de-Montréal, Montreal, Quebec, Canada; School of Rehabilitation, Université de Montréal, Montreal, Quebec, Canada; Ethics Research Center (CRÉ), Montreal, Quebec, Canada.
J Pain. 2022 May;23(5):729-738. doi: 10.1016/j.jpain.2021.11.005. Epub 2021 Nov 28.
Suffering holds a central place within pain research, theory, and practice. However, the construct of pain-related suffering has yet to be operationalized by the International Association for the Study of Pain and is largely underdeveloped. Eric Cassell's seminal work on suffering serves as a conceptual anchor for the limited pain research that specifically addresses this construct. Yet, important critiques of Cassell's work have not been integrated within the pain literature. This Focus Article aims to take a preliminary step towards an updated operationalization of pain-related suffering by 1) presenting key attributes of pain-related suffering derived from a synthesis of the literature and 2) highlighting key challenges associated with Cassell's conceptualization of suffering. We present 4 key attributes: 1) pain and suffering are inter-related, but distinct experiences, 2) suffering is a subjective experience, 3) the experience of suffering is characterized by a negative affective valence, and 4) disruption to one's sense of self is an integral part of suffering. A key outstanding challenge is that suffering is commonly viewed as a self-reflective and future-oriented process, which fails to validate many forms of suffering and marginalizes certain populations. Future research addressing different modes of suffering - with and without self-reflection - are discussed. PERSPECTIVE: This article offers a preliminary step toward operationalizing the construct of pain-related suffering and proposes priorities for future research. A robust operationalization of this construct is essential to developing clinical strategies that aim to better recognize and alleviate suffering among people living with pain.
在疼痛研究、理论及实践中,苦难占据着核心地位。然而,国际疼痛研究协会尚未对与疼痛相关的苦难这一概念进行操作化定义,且在很大程度上仍未得到充分发展。埃里克·卡塞尔关于苦难的开创性著作,为专门探讨这一概念的有限疼痛研究提供了概念基础。然而,对卡塞尔著作的重要批评尚未被纳入疼痛文献中。本焦点文章旨在朝着更新与疼痛相关的苦难的操作化定义迈出初步步伐,方法是:1)呈现通过文献综合得出的与疼痛相关的苦难的关键属性;2)突出与卡塞尔对苦难的概念化相关的关键挑战。我们提出了4个关键属性:1)疼痛和苦难相互关联,但体验不同;2)苦难是一种主观体验;3)苦难的体验以负面情感效价为特征;4)自我意识的扰乱是苦难的一个组成部分。一个关键的突出挑战是,苦难通常被视为一个自我反思且面向未来的过程,这无法验证许多形式的苦难,并使某些人群边缘化。文中讨论了针对不同苦难模式(有或没有自我反思)的未来研究。观点:本文朝着对与疼痛相关的苦难这一概念进行操作化定义迈出了初步步伐,并提出了未来研究的重点。对这一概念进行强有力的操作化定义对于制定旨在更好地识别和减轻疼痛患者苦难的临床策略至关重要。