Suppr超能文献

970nm 低水平激光治疗在 II 类颌间弹性牵引治疗中对正畸牙移动的影响:一项 RCT 研究。

Effect of 970 nm low-level laser therapy on orthodontic tooth movement during Class II intermaxillary elastics treatment: a RCT.

机构信息

Department of Orthodontics, UIC 11, CHU de Nantes, Nantes, France.

Division of Fixed Prosthodontics, University of Nantes, 44042, Nantes, France.

出版信息

Sci Rep. 2021 Dec 1;11(1):23226. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-02610-7.

Abstract

This prospective randomized clinical trial aimed to evaluate the effect of low-level laser therapy on tooth movement during Class II intermaxillary elastics treatment. Forty-two patients with Class II malocclusion were included, and their maxillary quadrants were allocated into two groups: treatment with an active diode laser and a placebo group. In each group, the time taken to obtain Class I occlusion after 6 months, rate of movement, total displacement of the maxillary canine to Class I occlusion and pain were recorded. The time to reach Class I occlusion in the active laser group (2.46 ± 2.1 months) was not significantly different from that in the placebo group (2.48 ± 2.0 months) (p = 0.938). Interestingly, the total distance of movement on the active laser side (2.27 ± 1.5 mm) was significantly greater than that on the placebo side (1.64 ± 1.3 mm) (p = 0.009). The pain levels on days 1, 2 and 3 were not significantly different between the laser and placebo sections. The rate of distance change toward Class I occlusion in the laser group (1.1 ± 0.7 mm/month) was significantly higher than that in the placebo group (0.74 ± 0.6 mm/month) (p = 0.037). Low-level laser therapy (970 nm) did not reduce the time needed to obtain Class I occlusion, but a significant acceleration in tooth movement was observed in the irradiated group.Trial registration: NCT02181439. Registered 04 July 2014- https://www.clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/results?term=cinelaser .

摘要

本前瞻性随机临床试验旨在评估低水平激光疗法在 II 类颌间弹性体治疗中牙齿移动的效果。共纳入 42 例 II 类错畸形患者,将其上颌象限分为两组:实验组用主动二极管激光治疗,对照组用安慰剂治疗。每组记录 6 个月后获得 I 类咬合的时间、移动率、上颌尖牙总位移至 I 类咬合以及疼痛情况。实验组(2.46±2.1 个月)达到 I 类咬合的时间与对照组(2.48±2.0 个月)无显著差异(p=0.938)。有趣的是,实验组(2.27±1.5mm)的总运动距离明显大于对照组(1.64±1.3mm)(p=0.009)。实验组和对照组在激光和安慰剂组的第 1、2、3 天的疼痛水平无显著差异。实验组(1.1±0.7mm/月)的距离变化率向 I 类咬合的速度明显高于对照组(0.74±0.6mm/月)(p=0.037)。低水平激光疗法(970nm)并未减少获得 I 类咬合所需的时间,但照射组的牙齿移动速度明显加快。试验注册:NCT02181439。于 2014 年 7 月 4 日注册- https://www.clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/results?term=cinelaser。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9eb5/8636571/1b4fdfbc1ba6/41598_2021_2610_Fig1_HTML.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验