Section of Plant Pathology and Plant-Microbe Biology, School of Integrative Plant Science, Cornell University, Geneva, NY 14456.
Department of Entomology and Plant Pathology, Mountain Horticulture and Crops Research & Extension Center, North Carolina State University, Mills River, NC 28759.
Plant Dis. 2022 Apr;106(4):1226-1237. doi: 10.1094/PDIS-09-21-2025-RE. Epub 2022 Mar 29.
Powdery mildew, caused by the ascomycete , is an endemic disease found wherever apples are grown that reduces both tree vigor and fresh market yield. In the absence of durable host resistance, chemical management is the primary means of disease control. Demethylation inhibitor (DMI) fungicides are widely used to manage apple powdery mildew, but members within this fungicide class have been observed to differ in efficacy with respect to disease control. Moreover, debate exists as to the optimal timing of DMI fungicide applications for management of apple powdery mildew. In this regard, the goal of this study was to determine the best-use practices for DMI fungicides to manage apple powdery mildew in New York State. Multiyear trials were conducted to evaluate the potential differential efficacy performance of four common DMI fungicides, and additional trials were conducted to assess optimal application timing. In all years, we observed that treatments of flutriafol and myclobutanil consistently had the lowest incidences of powdery mildew compared with difenoconazole and fenbuconazole. In the 2018 and 2021 trials, the newly registered mefentrifluconazole was more comparable to the difenoconazole program with respect to powdery mildew disease incidence. We hypothesize that differences in DMI efficacy may result from each fungicide's water solubility and lipophilicity characteristics and thus their ability to move systemically in the host or more easily penetrate the surface of germinating conidia. Applications timed between petal fall and first cover resulted in the lowest incidence of powdery mildew on terminal leaves of apple shoots compared with applications timed before petal fall. These observations are contrary to previous studies conducted in regions with differing climates. We also found that the incidence of secondary powdery mildew observed 2 weeks after petal fall was influenced by applications of DMI fungicides during the previous season. For example, management programs consisting of applications of flutriafol or myclobutanil in the previous season tended to have lower incidence of apple powdery in the next spring, presumably because of reductions in overwintering inoculum. Despite reports of DMI resistance in other apple pathosystems, the DMI fungicide class is still relevant for the successful management of apple powdery mildew in New York State.
白粉病是由子囊菌引起的,是一种在所有苹果种植区都存在的地方性疾病,会降低树木活力和鲜果产量。在缺乏持久的宿主抗性的情况下,化学防治是控制疾病的主要手段。脱甲基抑制剂(DMI)杀菌剂被广泛用于防治苹果白粉病,但该杀菌剂类别中的成员在防治效果方面存在差异。此外,关于 DMI 杀菌剂防治苹果白粉病的最佳施药时间还存在争议。在这方面,本研究的目标是确定在纽约州使用 DMI 杀菌剂防治苹果白粉病的最佳实践。进行了多年试验,以评估四种常用 DMI 杀菌剂的潜在差异功效表现,并进行了额外的试验来评估最佳施药时间。在所有年份,我们都观察到与氟环唑和嘧菌酯相比,氟唑菌酰胺和苯醚甲环唑处理的白粉病发病率最低。在 2018 年和 2021 年的试验中,新注册的甲呋酰胺在白粉病发病率方面与氟环唑方案更为相似。我们假设 DMI 功效的差异可能是由于每种杀菌剂的水溶性和脂溶性特征不同,因此它们在宿主中系统移动或更容易穿透萌发分生孢子表面的能力不同。与在花瓣脱落前施药相比,在花瓣脱落与首次覆盖之间施药可使苹果新梢末端叶片上的白粉病发病率最低。这些观察结果与在气候不同的地区进行的先前研究相反。我们还发现,在花瓣脱落 2 周后观察到的次生白粉病的发生率受到上一季 DMI 杀菌剂施药的影响。例如,在上一季施药的氟唑菌酰胺或嘧菌酯管理方案下,下一个春季的苹果白粉病发病率通常较低,这可能是由于越冬接种体减少。尽管在其他苹果病原体系统中报告了 DMI 抗性,但 DMI 杀菌剂类别仍然是成功防治纽约州苹果白粉病的重要手段。